Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"AP: Chances of health compromise continue to fade." Enzi, Repug, Wyo.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 12:08 AM
Original message
"AP: Chances of health compromise continue to fade." Enzi, Repug, Wyo.
Edited on Sun Aug-30-09 12:52 AM by Emit
On Edit: As others have pointed out, we are likely better off without a compromise. I just hope enough of the Blue Dog Dems can be persuaded to vote in favor to push a decent bill through.



Chances of health compromise continue to fade

WASHINGTON – A leading GOP negotiator on health care struck a further blow to fading chances of a bipartisan compromise by saying Democratic proposals would restrict medical choices and make the country's "finances sicker without saving you money."

The criticism from Sen. Michael Enzi, R-Wyo., echoed that of many opponents of the Democratic plans under consideration in Congress. But Enzi's judgment was especially noteworthy because he is one of only three Republicans who have been willing to consider a bipartisan bill in the Senate.

In the Republicans' weekly radio and Internet address on Saturday, Enzi said any health care legislation must lower medical costs for Americans without increasing deficits and the national debt.

~snip~

"I heard a lot of frustration and anger as I traveled across my home state this last few weeks," said Enzi, who has been targeted by critics for seeking to negotiate on legislation. "People in Wyoming and across the country are anxious about what Washington has in mind. This is big. This is personal. This is one of the most important debates of our lifetime."

~snip~
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090830/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_republicans


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yay! A bill which only gets Democratic votes will be better. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
t0dd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think I'll call and thank him.
The more Republicans concede a bipartisan solution to health care reform is impossible, the less our spineless Democrats will compromise the legislation to death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. "The work goes on,the cause endures, the hope sill lives and
The Dreams shall never die"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good! Best news I've heard all week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. GOOD! I don't want a compromise, I want health care.
Understand, I have some of the most expensive health care money can buy. I am a Union Sheet Metal Worker. $11.00 and change comes out of my paycheck EVERY HOUR to pay for my health care. Do the math! $11.00 per hour X 40 hours = $440.00 per week X 50 weeks = $22,000.00+ per year. I'm buying my health care company a fucking house! If that's not bad enough, I am scared to death to go to the MD because the co-pays are so high that they drain every disposable dollar I take home.

This system is fucked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly...!
More "compromise" merely means giving away more of what the general public needs to make health care affordable and available. Further "compromise" would probably mean eliminating the public option and employer mandate, leaving the health-care bill as being nothing but the individual mandate that would require people by law to purchase private insurance at current rates, or face a hefty fine for the "privilege" of being uninsured.

The time for compromise has come and gone; now it's time for forcing a bill (with provisions supported by the vast majority of the American people) through Congress. If that means getting enough Repugs and Blue Dogs to break a filibuster on a bill like that, fine. If not, it's time for the budget reconciliation process.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC