Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two outlooks on the 2010 House races

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:28 PM
Original message
Two outlooks on the 2010 House races
The first from Raw Story

Democrats poised to lose 20 to 50 seats in House: analysts (according to political analysts quoted in Monday's Politico) :spray: :rofl:

According to two key observers, Charlie Cook and 538.com's Nate Silver, Democrats are poised to lose "double-digit" seats in the House amid an increasingly bitter political climate.

Silver apparently stunned a liberal audience at the blogger convention Netroots Nation earlier this month, saying that the Republicans have a 25 to 33 percent chance of retaking the House. For both observers, such a happenstance seems unlikely, though first- and second-term Democrats appear particularly vulnerable.

http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/08/democrats-poised-to-lose-20-to-50-seats-in-house-analysts/

And then there is CQ Politics;


With 257 of the 435 U.S. House seats, Democrats are strongly favored to retain their majority in the 2010 elections -- though history points to party losses in the first midterm election of President Obama.

Most of the 435 congressional districts have such well-entrenched incumbents that the 2010 House races there will be landslides. But CQ Politics has preliminarily identified 100 districts, 59 of which are held by Democrats, where the contests should be highly or mildly competitive. Of these, CQ Politics rates three districts, all now held by Republicans, as leaning toward takeover by the challenging party: Louisiana 2, Pennsylvania 6 and Illinois 10. (Democrats net gain=3)

http://innovation.cqpolitics.com/atlas/house2010_rr?ref=hp


Who to believe? I don't believe Charlie Cook, and this time I think Nate Silver is WRONG.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm glad they are competitive now let's make the Senate a parliamentary body...
Edited on Mon Aug-31-09 07:55 PM by Skink
with atleast a thousand seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Also shows how little we care about anything more than a day away
no responses, no comments. Maybe I'll just post pictures of Megan Fox instead.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. And what does Nate Silver or Charlie Cook have to say about Miss Fox?
Mr. Silver? Mr. Cook? If you're not going to say anything, please refrain from drooling on the furniture. Gentlemen, please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. But but isn't OUR opinion relevant?
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, you could post a poll...
Let me see...

Megan Fox: Hawt or Megahawt?

Hawt

Megahawt

A suffusion of Yellow

Robb is a Dingbat

That might work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've yet to see exact quotes from Nate Silver regarding that quote. Example, did he qualify
Edited on Tue Sep-01-09 01:18 PM by KittyWampus
that comment with something like "if Democrats don't pass health care bill".

Has Nate ever expounded on that after so many jumped on it?

I respect him very much and would like context his comment was given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think we might have strong losses but hopefully not loss of control
One thing I've seen in this health care debate is it appears that conservative activists are more united and outspoken and organized than liberals. In midterm elections when turnout is relatively small THEY WILL TURN OUT. I'm not so sure about liberal base especially if we compromise on health care. Then there are the age demographics. President Obama continues to have his strongest support among 18-29 year olds while, the president's support is softest among seniors who believe that helping more people have insurance will somehow hurt there medicare program. Now, seniors also always turn out and vote while younger voters, especially in midterms do not turn out in large numbers.

Finally, if the economy isn't looking a lot better by October and November of 2010 with unemployment falling then, as is always the case, the party in power will be held responsible, no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. i'VE GOT A PARTY IN MY POCKET AND THE ELECTION JUST DON'T MATTER



oOHHH OOOHHH TRIVIAL STUFF, LETS RECOMMEND IT TILL IT'S A ZILLION arrghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No offense to Miss Fox, who is quite attractive...
She always seems to have a bit of a vacant look in the camera. Ahem! Oh yes, our majorities in the House and Senate. I think its early to start assuming. We may lose some seats, particularly in the House, such seems to be the trend in mid terms after a WH victory IIRC, that said, I think a lot will depend on the state of the economy, and the passage of Health Care Reform.

If the Economy goes well, Obama can take credit for it, and this may assist Democrats in Congress.

If HCR is passed, it will show the GOP to be effectively toothless, and possibly weaken their position.

Time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. If real healthcare reform is not passed
then yes, the congress could be retaken by the Nazis.............err,...I mean the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. What this tells me is that RAW story isn't anymore interested in context
than other media are.

That's sad to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC