Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Post-mortems for Ted Kennedy: Burying the remains of American liberalism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:07 AM
Original message
Post-mortems for Ted Kennedy: Burying the remains of American liberalism
A common theme runs through most of the official testimonials and press commentaries on Senator Edward (Ted) Kennedy... While acknowledging that the senator’s death closes a chapter in American politics, the eulogies focus on the most insignificant period of his long career.

Ted Kennedy, so runs the story line, really came into his own when he abandoned his presidential aspirations, recognized that there would never be another Kennedy administration, and found a way to work within the limits of a right-wing political environment hostile to New Deal/New Frontier/Great Society-style reformism...

Conservative columnist David Brooks of the New York Times described Kennedy as “The Great Gradualist.” Times writer Sam Tanenhaus, in a retrospective entitled “In Kennedy, the Last Roar of the New Deal Liberal,” criticized Kennedy’s “intemperate denunciation of Judge Robert H. Bork in 1987,” and condemned his attempt to unseat incumbent Democratic President Jimmy Carter in the 1980 presidential primaries as his “gravest miscalculation.”

Similarly, the Los Angeles Times in an editorial on Sunday bemoaned Kennedy’s “ill-considered campaign for the 1980 Democratic presidential nomination” and his “hyperbolic warning that confirming Robert H. Bork for the Supreme Court would usher in the return of segregated lunch counters and back-alley abortions...”

In fact, both episodes were among the more principled moments in Kennedy’s career...

Nearly a half-century has passed since John F. Kennedy announced his candidacy for the presidency...at roughly the mid-point between the election of Woodrow Wilson in 1912 and the election of Barack Obama in 2008.

In announcing his candidacy, Kennedy declared that he would, if elected, provide answers to the following crucial issues: “ow to rebuild the stature of American science and education; how to prevent the collapse of our farm economy and the decay of our cities; how to achieve, without further inflation or unemployment, expanded economic growth benefiting all Americans; and how to give direction to our traditional moral purpose...

When he delivered this speech, Kennedy viewed himself as a politically moderate representative of a liberal capitalist “progressive” tradition that had been inaugurated by Woodrow Wilson. We now know that the Kennedy administration, which ended with the assassination in Dallas, marked the beginning of the protracted death agony of that tradition...

...the cause of social reform was abandoned, the hope was dead, and the dream, whatever it was, continued only as an illusion.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/sep2009/pers-s01.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. As usual....a lot of truths are presented before the 'lie' and this article is no different.
this article is pretty good until it gets to the final paragraphs, and in this DU quote,

"...the cause of social reform was abandoned, the hope was dead, and the dream, whatever it was, continued only as an illusion."

Social reform has not been abandoned. In fact, IT IS QUITE STRONG. Social reform (i.e., healthcare reform) is QUITE POPULAR/STRONG these days.....despite the corporate msm's attempts to TELL YOU (proles, are you listening???) otherwise,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's not a "lie," it's an opinion about something that's impossible to prove one way or the other.
There is desire for democratic reform from the masses.

I'm not seeing a lot of response from their "leaders" on either side of the political spectrum, myself.

PS: The Trots aren't MSM, unless you believe the rumor that they're funded by the PTB to draw legitimate dissent into harmless channels.

Which is always a possibility in our corporate democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. PTB? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. powers that be, i.e. political/corporate ruling class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is Rubbish....Liberalism is dead? then explain recent elections...
Explain the Bush Failures and lack of any success at all...

Today I heard one pub explaining how the Bush dudes kept us SAFE...Pure undiluted Crap...9/11 happened on Bushies Watch..he even had warnings but failed to pass on those warnings...some of them DIRE....and still Bush went golfing instead of st least warning...

Liberalism is whats good about this Nation

Conservatism is in a Death Spiral...and its getting worse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Then why are we still told we have to "compromise" with the far right?
(Cause reagan/bush policy, to me, = far right)

Why is the Obama admin operationalizing Bush policies?

There may be grassroots desire for return to something like New Deal/New Frontier/Great Society - but in the halls of power?

I don't see it, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I regret that I have to agree for some time now, even ostensibly liberal proposals begin
Edited on Tue Sep-01-09 03:32 AM by Douglas Carpenter
at the center-right and then negotiate even farther right.

A prime example would be the parameter of debate over health care reform.

In a truly politically progressive environment - the proposal would begin with a call for a totally publicly supported national health service - and possibly negotiate toward single-payer universal health care to satisfy the centrist. Or at the very least it would be a proposal for single-payer universal health care and we might have to negotiate toward a mixed system for the sake of political plausibility.

As is, the negotiations begin with simply a proposal for mandatory health insurance with the most optimistic hope being a proposal that might, if we are VERY, VERY fortunate, include a public option.

The popularity of a single-payer system among Democrats and Americans as a whole does not even enter into the equation of what is even considered politically plausible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Chess move...first phase...invitation to bi partisan....rejection..2nd phase, dump efforts..go alone
2nd Phase...demonstration of success...phase...confirmation of policies and decisions...

Obama may seem like he is continuing Bushie shit ...but so far...his mode is much different than Bushies...night and day

Many people don't see this..its normal....but many many others see it...hence his numbers hold..

President Obama has a full plate...the most any President had in the past 50 years....

adding to the horrors..is the constant sniping from his pol enemies, namely Zit Head and the GOP GOON Squad...who work tirelessly to make life miserable for the DEm Party and Obama...

Won't work for 2010...didn't work the last time either...nor did it in 06...

Conservatism was hurt real bad by the Bush Bet....he was a loser....the GOP lost creds big time

and now will suffer even more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. boy, they are hopin'
So what was the Obama election about anyhow... I saw it as the gathering of the liberal tribe and the reinvigoration of the movement...
You know, the dream shall never die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC