|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:33 AM Original message |
Inglourious Basterds: Quentin Tarantino goes to war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. you either get Tarantino or you don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. because he is an idiot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. exhibit A |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sudopod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
136. I don't read anything by Jonathan Swift |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:59 PM Response to Reply #136 |
152. Literary allusions FTW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
242. If you call Skittles a "dude", she just may have to KICK YOUR ASS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:13 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. there's nothing to "get". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:15 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. there's plenty to get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. I'm with you skittles... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Deleted sub-thread |
izquierdista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:28 AM Response to Reply #10 |
96. I'm with Hannah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. describe it to me, then. the things you "get". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
25. +1 : It was great fun and a good film on many levels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:23 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. "great" "good" "funny" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:35 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:51 AM Response to Reply #29 |
37. "good" "great" "funny" are all demonstrably empty words, all referencing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:00 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. All film criticism is opinion. Nothing more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:10 AM Response to Reply #41 |
48. i don't think you want to engage on any serious level on either the "opinion" portion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:15 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. That's fine. That's really all you've done in this thread so far anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:19 AM Response to Reply #49 |
53. you've already told me there's no ground for discussion in matters of opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
junkiebrewster (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:58 AM Response to Reply #48 |
100. Have you seen it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:29 PM Response to Reply #100 |
165. I'm betting we'll be waiting a while for any answer to that one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TommyO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:42 AM Response to Reply #100 |
233. I saw the movie last night, and you're absolutely right about the bar scene |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
el_bryanto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:05 AM Response to Reply #41 |
235. You are on an opinion site; you can't really knock opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prometheus Bound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:11 AM Response to Reply #41 |
240. I didn't see a single run-on sentence. Can you give one example? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #26 |
176. now you're just making a fool of yourself. can't to just stick to political failthreads comrade? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:37 AM Response to Reply #4 |
91. Uh, yes there is. Just because you don't get it, doesn't mean there's nothing to get. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:44 AM Response to Reply #91 |
94. thanks for the exposition on bricolage, hampton. it justifies reservoir dogs & pulp fiction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
131. I'm with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
22. So you do, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonkers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
80. I am a T. fan. This outing disappointed me. I do think it is ridiculous to give T. a hard time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
124. Please explain what I'm "not getting". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
212. Those who argue that those who disagree with them "don't get it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:10 AM Response to Original message |
3. so he did us all a favor with the ridiculous misspellings..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. 88% on the Tomato Meter and it's raked in 73 million in a couple weeks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:42 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. wow, so lots of people "get" it. lots of people "get" jerry springer, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SergeStorms (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:21 AM Response to Reply #11 |
81. And a vast majority of Americans........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:11 PM Response to Reply #81 |
205. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:15 PM Response to Reply #205 |
211. Another beaut! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fedja (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
7. Bleh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:43 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. "art" doesn't exist & tarantino wouldn't be "art" even if there were such a thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:50 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I can defend my argument. I notice you can't even explain what there is to "get" in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:20 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Allow me to help you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:27 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. You just "don't get "it" " .... lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fedja (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:42 AM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:05 AM Response to Reply #19 |
44. So defend it. Actually - what *is* your argument? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:16 AM Response to Reply #44 |
51. "vitriolic"? why, it's just someone's "opinion". & as you've already told me, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:23 AM Response to Reply #51 |
54. That's a great explanation of your 'argument'. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:30 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. that was your argument. never had a film class. but you are tired. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:47 AM Response to Reply #57 |
63. I'll tell you, and then I'm going to bed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:52 AM Response to Reply #63 |
65. "whatever I write will be rudely met by you, and not discussed 'seriously' at all." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fedja (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:48 AM Response to Reply #15 |
35. Hard to argue with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:53 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. is someone preventing someone from having "opinions"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
164. #16 ^^^ is why I'll never be a communist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
172. what do you have against quentin comrade? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
210. You do realize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
subcomhd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:51 PM Response to Reply #210 |
215. Well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:11 AM Response to Reply #215 |
221. isn't it ironic you don't have any idea what i'm talking about, & don't even bother to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
subcomhd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:01 AM Response to Reply #221 |
222. You are saying there is no such thing as art. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 05:03 AM Response to Reply #222 |
227. but you don't know what i mean; you just assume i mean what you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
subcomhd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:48 AM Response to Reply #227 |
234. it doesn't matter what you mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:09 AM Response to Reply #210 |
220. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 05:08 AM Response to Reply #220 |
228. "many things inspire emotion, & some "art" doesn't. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 05:37 AM Response to Reply #228 |
229. so glenn beck = art because he inspires emotion? this linkage of art & emotion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 07:31 PM Response to Reply #229 |
243. Glen Beck? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:18 AM Response to Reply #15 |
226. Art doesn't exist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:24 AM Response to Reply #7 |
27. No Man's land comnpares to IG ? Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fedja (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:37 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. NML compares to IG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:58 AM Response to Reply #30 |
40. I think there is a big difference in how NML and IG take a different spin on a wartime setting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fedja (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:02 AM Response to Reply #40 |
43. That makes sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:05 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. "to appease our revulsion to seeing people getting slaughtered, tortured" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:27 AM Response to Reply #45 |
55. I think that is the point other people are neglecting in this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:40 AM Response to Reply #55 |
59. i haven't seen hostel, but i take your point, & basically agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:43 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. " The past didn't go anyhwere " - for some people, apparently, it did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:24 AM Response to Reply #59 |
117. I find this discussion interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daedalus_dude (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:29 AM Response to Original message |
8. It seems like Tarantino doesn't buy into "it is not the troops fault". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:29 AM Response to Original message |
9. This sums up the critic in this piece: "Munich, in many ways a remarkable film..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:59 AM Response to Reply #9 |
20. And that bit about so many despising Munich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:07 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. compared to what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:19 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Metacritic uses pros too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:38 AM Response to Reply #23 |
31. "That so many critics despised Munich and are now praising Tarantino's latest film" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:46 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Could be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:59 PM Response to Reply #21 |
153. Munich got a 77% overall on RT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:07 AM Response to Reply #9 |
103. I really liked Munich, a great, underrated film the critics completely misunderstood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:20 AM Response to Reply #103 |
129. Once was enough... I got 'it' just fine with Spielberg's ham-fisted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:11 AM Response to Reply #9 |
104. I haven't seen Munich, but I saw Basterds: it's bloated/ moves at a snail's pace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:13 AM Response to Reply #104 |
105. OK, I'm stupid. What is IG? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #105 |
169. I've been having a good chuckle that that myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
171. munich was pretty boring to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrawlingChaos (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:54 AM Response to Original message |
17. K&R - I'll definitely pass on this crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:56 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. "pre-paid arrangement with critics" - wouldn't be the first time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fedja (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:46 AM Response to Reply #17 |
34. Or maybe you move in different circles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:49 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. You never saw Ghost Rider, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
subcomhd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
209. have you seen this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:00 AM Response to Reply #34 |
42. why would you decide i am "offended"? why do you think criticism/discussion of this "art" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fedja (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:06 AM Response to Reply #42 |
47. Not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:27 AM Response to Reply #47 |
56. it's not "my" review. and a review of something is implicitly the reviewer's "opinion". So why you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:16 AM Response to Reply #34 |
50. it's beyond retarded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:41 AM Response to Reply #50 |
60. high critique, there. of course, no one's "offended," but if you're 12 you won't get that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrawlingChaos (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:10 AM Response to Reply #34 |
73. Speaking of retarded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:17 AM Response to Reply #73 |
78. +1. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost of Tom Joad (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:23 AM Response to Reply #73 |
116. "bad" I'm curious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrawlingChaos (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #116 |
168. The semantics bothers you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
39. There's nothing smart in that review |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:18 AM Response to Reply #39 |
52. hear hear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:31 AM Response to Reply #52 |
58. That makes you look really smart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:59 AM Response to Reply #52 |
67. lol, philistines! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:08 AM Response to Reply #52 |
127. film snobbery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrawlingChaos (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #127 |
163. Glad you brought up Godard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:51 AM Response to Reply #39 |
64. i agree with you on the writing: i find a lot of the wsws content - non-succinct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sudopod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:06 AM Response to Reply #39 |
138. I saw Hitler laughing it up at the violence on the screen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:06 AM Response to Original message |
46. I loved it---Loved Kill Bill one and two.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:04 AM Response to Reply #46 |
68. "Let me guess--- you're against violent video games as well" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:39 AM Response to Reply #68 |
93. "the unhip old lady yelling "get off my lawn, you kids"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:45 AM Response to Reply #93 |
95. well, that's "your opinion," & opinions are all equally valid & unvalid, as the hipsters tell me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:46 AM Response to Original message |
62. Tarantino is a one trick pony, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:23 AM Response to Reply #62 |
107. Yup. Reservoir Dogs shocked me with it's "comic" violence and torture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:04 PM Response to Reply #62 |
218. Thank you! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w8liftinglady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:54 AM Response to Original message |
66. I liked it.Fun movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:04 AM Response to Original message |
69. Be careful what you hate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
70. I found the movie to be good and interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:07 AM Response to Original message |
71. Hannah Bell: please review the DU copyright rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:08 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. wsws gives permission to post entire articles so long as they are credited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:14 AM Response to Reply #72 |
75. how unfortunate for us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:15 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. yes, isn't it? unfortunate for you, i mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:19 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Not really, Ms.Bell. You seem to tone deaf to the amusement and snark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:34 AM Response to Reply #79 |
88. you think i'm tone deaf to your snark? au contraire, mon frere. je suis tres |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:55 AM Response to Reply #75 |
99. ROFL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:16 AM Response to Reply #72 |
77. They claim copyright at the bottom of the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:32 AM Response to Reply #77 |
86. I've emailed them on their policy re discussion boards before. There's also this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 01:35 PM Response to Reply #86 |
160. Little problem there, Hannah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #160 |
174. as i said, i've emailed them re discussion boards. they have no problem with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 01:32 PM Response to Reply #72 |
159. Not according to the bottom of their main page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonkers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:11 AM Response to Original message |
74. This was a disappointing, overhyped film that lacks the coherency and economy that he is capable of. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:08 AM Response to Reply #74 |
126. I am of a similar mind as you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonkers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 01:10 PM Response to Reply #126 |
155. How did I leave out JB? That film is so "rewachable" which Is the real test. Good old Ordelle, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
82. I loved Basterds - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
83. Another train unrec of a post from WSWS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:35 AM Response to Reply #83 |
89. yes, & you presence ties up the package with a pretty banking bow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:25 AM Response to Original message |
84. This is in GD why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
3dfan (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:26 AM Response to Original message |
85. like it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
87. He thinks he's a noteworthy director like Sergio Leone or Ang Lee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:37 AM Response to Reply #87 |
92. so subtle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:17 AM Response to Reply #92 |
225. Neither is he even Soderbergh or Kurosawa, Tarantino is a ham-handed Peckinpah at best... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
90. Tarentino is a guy who pushes the boundaries in order to sell movies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:35 AM Response to Reply #90 |
97. It's possible to understand what he's trying to do.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:33 AM Response to Reply #97 |
108. I don't think he is glorifying violence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:37 AM Response to Reply #108 |
110. QT's forumla: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
98. Didn't Tarantino do the vampire movie Dusk til Dawn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:05 AM Response to Reply #98 |
101. That was one of his poorer movies and he wrote it, did not direct it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
102. I could never afford to go to see this movie, but I will see it if it makes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
junkiebrewster (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
106. I liked the film |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
109. The Trotskyites obviously can't do movie reviews either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #109 |
177. !11!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
111. Fuck Brad Pitt.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:49 AM Response to Reply #111 |
113. too bad for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:36 AM Response to Reply #113 |
119. His abilities? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:04 AM Response to Reply #119 |
125. Well, Pitt has also spent a great deal of his money and time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:30 AM Response to Reply #119 |
133. So whose pockets are you putting money in? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:24 AM Response to Reply #133 |
139. At the moment my money is going to support candidates who are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:32 AM Response to Reply #139 |
141. Nice dodge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:40 AM Response to Reply #141 |
142. LOL.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:45 AM Response to Reply #142 |
143. How about an honest one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #143 |
146. I gave you one ~~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. No, you didn't. You dodged like a coward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #146 |
151. Pitt is an unrepetant liberal who puts his own money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rebubula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #139 |
182. Golly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #119 |
175. So why are you taking part in a movie thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #111 |
173. wow, what's with the bitterness against pitt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:33 AM Response to Reply #111 |
232. haaaa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
112. The film-maker has done his job in provoking comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
114. I liked this film... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
115. Yeah, yeah. And Charles Barkley's a role model. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
118. I'm glad you have another chance to feel superior. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:58 AM Response to Reply #118 |
121. You can either like or hate Tarantino... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
120. Movie Critic Is The Most Useless Job on Earth, Bar None. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 01:19 PM Response to Reply #120 |
157. Completely agree! I like Tarantino's movies ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #120 |
198. Because the critic (generally) is much more knowledgeable about film. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:50 PM Response to Reply #198 |
201. So What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:59 PM Response to Reply #201 |
203. But many people loved Transformers, despite the critics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:21 PM Response to Reply #203 |
207. They Are Absolutely Correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
122. Blood porn. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:30 AM Response to Reply #122 |
134. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
subcomhd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
123. WSWS has movie reviews? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seldona (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
128. Nonchalant ultra-violence took place during war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
130. So the reviewer knows what to expect from a Tarantino film... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
132. Whats your input?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raouldukelives (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
135. What an awful movie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #135 |
179. XD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
137. I can only hope that we have trolls posting on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:30 AM Response to Reply #137 |
140. I don't think its a matter of people on DU being slow learners... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:50 PM Response to Reply #140 |
150. Good points, Javaman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 01:28 PM Response to Reply #150 |
158. You don't get JAZZ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 11:47 AM Response to Reply #137 |
144. They don't care. They have their opinion of Tarantino, and cast reality to conform to opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:34 PM Response to Reply #137 |
167. oh, there's plenty of idiotic DUers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TommyO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:11 AM Response to Reply #137 |
237. Well, technically Hitler didn't die in a fire during a film premier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bamacrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
145. Its a great movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
148. De gustibus non est disputandum n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:03 PM Response to Reply #148 |
178. So this thread doesn't exist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:05 PM Response to Reply #178 |
189. no (point in) disputing matters of taste. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #189 |
191. Yes, I know what it means. I responded to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #191 |
194. the logic of your response = unclear. at least to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:47 PM Response to Reply #194 |
195. I'm ok with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitsune (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
149. I rather liked it, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
154. I liked the movie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EndersDame (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
156. I loved the Idea behind the film Oppressed rising up and taking vengence on their oppressors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParkieDem (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
161. Well, I liked it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
162. Oh, go masturbate to Masterpiece Theatre, San Solei, or the like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
166. uh oh.... you trashed somebody's fantasy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
170. it looks great, i cant wait to see it. nor do i care what the world socialist party thinks of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
180. Quentin Tarantino rawks!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CKennedy16 (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #180 |
181. This movie ROCKS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #181 |
183. yeah---she's a babe.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
184. Interesting thread.. Your comment in the replies about "art" not existing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #184 |
185. It's a cut and paste job from the intellectually sophmoric 'World Socialist Web Site' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:04 PM Response to Reply #185 |
187. talk about one trick pony lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:04 PM Response to Reply #185 |
188. it's an opinion, & per your own writing, there's no basis for setting one "opinion" higher than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 03:58 PM Response to Reply #184 |
186. i didn't write the review. i submit that many films, books, etc (such as glenn beck's) will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:07 PM Response to Reply #186 |
190. What is your classification of what makes art art? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #190 |
193. Art: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:10 PM Response to Reply #186 |
192. Yes but Beck is writing opinions on things already happening, not creating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:03 AM Response to Reply #192 |
219. writing non-fiction is a creative activity. when you write a prose piece, you're creating something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
196. It was good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baikonour (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
197. What an over-drawn article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:12 PM Response to Reply #197 |
200. The performance by Waltz is simply amazing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:11 AM Response to Reply #200 |
238. Complete agreement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:55 PM Response to Reply #197 |
202. +2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
junkiebrewster (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:01 AM Response to Reply #197 |
230. bingo!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
199. So what's your opinion of the movie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kid a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
204. hmm...now i HAVE to see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
206. Loved It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
votingupstart (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
208. saw it - liked it -- ITS A MOVIE - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
213. I'm not a fan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
214. I think Tarantino did an excellent job... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
216. I have yet to see this movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-01-09 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
217. I saw the film and I thought it glorified torture by American troops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:11 AM Response to Reply #217 |
224. You paid attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:08 AM Response to Original message |
223. Quack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
231. Should have at least put **ATTENTION: SPOILERS** with your OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:06 AM Response to Reply #231 |
236. What spoilers? You didn't know they were going to kill Nazis in the film? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
239. i don't know... i saw "Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS" tonight. i think Quentin is in for a run... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
241. Sounds like Audience Indictment to me (I have not seen it) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC