Wetzelbill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 08:41 AM
Original message |
Concerned about the bill's cost, so the public option needs to be killed? |
|
Is that really an argument anybody takes seriously?
The CBO report on the Kennedy HELP Bill without the public option put the costs at around a trillion dollars over ten years, then with the public option included the cost of the bill was 400 billion less.
WTF?
It's like bizarro world.
This is why I hate following politics -- I know, I know, I love it too but for other reasons. Politics is just so childish, and everything seems bass ackwards.
Let's see.
We need to restrain the cost of the bill, so you exclude the part that cuts costs.
More?
You aren't a credible voice on Iraq and foreign policy, unless you have been wrong on everything for years now, especially the war itself.
We have to follow the rule of law no matter where it leads, but we can't pursue the people who actually committed the worst crimes, because they are at the very top levels of government and it would be bad for our country to go that route.
You are considered a fiscal conservative, when you fully supported the policies that created our national debt and were against the ones that balanced the budget.
And on and on and on.
Honestly, how frustrating is this all? It's nervewracking.
|
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message |
1. If the bill is really too costly, then table it. Do not screw up a lot |
|
of Americans with a bad bill.
Or is too costly being used as an excuse because the Conservatives Dems and GOP) simply do not believe in the basic concept of health insurance for all.
|
Wetzelbill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I think the GOP just doesn't really believe in it |
|
and the ConservaDems are being paid not to.
|
trayfoot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 09:40 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Until the U.S. stops spending trillions on war, then don't insult our |
|
intelligence by saying "the cost is too great"!
|
Wetzelbill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
they have a choice, pass a bill that costs less and is more impactful, or pass a bill that is costs more and has less benefit. They are saying they are concerned about costs, so then they have to go with the more expensive bill. That doesn't even remotely make sense.
|
L0oniX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 09:44 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Oh ..but if its a war then it's all good! |
Wetzelbill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. well yes, but that just pays for itself |
Overseas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
7. I think 47,000,000 uninsured and millions bankrupt from medical bills is too high a cost. |
|
But if we're really serious about costs, why don't we use the system other countries use to COVER EVERYONE with more benefits than even Medicare offers, at a lower percentage of their GDP than we spend on healthcare? It's called SINGLE PAYER.
Ours could be an expansion and upgrading of Medicare.
Republicans will fight that tooth & nail because it feels so great to have health security. I know, I had it as a resident alien in another country. Feels great and I'd love the Democrats forever for making that happen.
|
Wetzelbill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. yeah but there is only one real problem with that |
|
It actually makes sense, which means our political leaders will run as far away from it as possible.
|
Overseas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. If we were serious about addressing our national health emergency, expanding Medicare |
|
would come out on top.
That's why the private insurers hired the amoral right wing PR firms to gin up dangerous fear and hatred to storm town halls with ridiculous rumors. Heaven forbid we spent August discussing the many ways in which the current cruel, privatized Pay-to-Play system is broken.
The private insurers were willing to pay for professional bullying to distract us from discussing the economics of healthcare. Because opening up Medicare to all who choose it makes the most sense.
After the right wing PR firms have been exposed for stimulating dangerous sentiments merely to protect private profits, I am amazed to hear any Democrats talking about how we need to keep things fair for private insurance companies. Is dangerous professional bullying fair?
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message |
10. It's a total lie... but they know the public is mostly too stupid to know better. |
|
They know Bush was right about one key point... that there are some people you CAN fool all the time, and those are the ones they focus on.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message |