Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Outrageous abuse of power by Grassley and staffer on Finance Committee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:12 AM
Original message
Outrageous abuse of power by Grassley and staffer on Finance Committee
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 01:19 AM by Are_grits_groceries
From "The Washington Note:

<snip>
But I want to raise another issue that is not about policy -- and is about abuse of power and pushing the investigatory part of "advice and consent" in presidential nominations to outrageous levels.

According to multiple sources, there is a staffer on the minority side of the Finance Committee who is going to absurd levels investigating the financial backgrounds of Obama administration nominees who fall under the jurisdiction of the committee.

Why is Max Baucus not confronting ranking Member Senator Chuck Grassley and this particular staffer with a direct confrontation about the absurdities and abuse that are now leaking out of the Committee?

Baucus is Chairman. He has real power. Is he using it? Is he afraid of Grassley and this staffer for some reason?

What I have learned is that a senior Obama administration official who has been languishing for some time in the Committee process -- and who this country really does need in his/her job because of the consequential portfolio that needs management now -- has had to put up with some of the most abusive and invasive investigations into financial matters of which I have ever heard.

This Committee staffer, in one example, wanted to see if the reporting of a "home office" on tax forms was legitimate. On the respective nominees, tax forms -- a square footage and percentage of house allocated to the office were designated. So, the staffer actually sent someone to the nominee's home to "measure" whether the square footage reporting was accurate or not. That's right. . .they went out to "measure" the house.

But wait, it gets better.

Then the staffer challenged the "valuation" of the home -- and the nominee showed the Committee staff the local government valuation and assessment of the home -- which is a legal record.

The staffer subjectively asserted that the valuation was too high -- and thus the deduction thus too high -- and ordered that a new valuation of the home be done.

What in the hell is this? They disregarded official government valuations of a house?
<snip>

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/

Baucus needs to go. He's not acting like a member of the Democratic Party in any manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. OMFG!
I'm an accountant, and that's some crazy ass shit you saying that is being done!

No wonder Obama can't fill the positions required....

Yep....Bogus Baucus has got to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If they came to measure my house,
I would seriously have to consider whether to dropkick them across the street or allow it to get the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, the part that I couldn't deal with is the Property Tax assessment of the value
being rejected. That's crazy!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That too!
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 01:29 AM by Are_grits_groceries
However, the actual act of somebody showing up with a tape measure would tempt me. That is an "in your face" power play.
I think my hair would catch on fire I would be so pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Way worse than even the biggest IRS asshole....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Word!
And I thought the IRS had the "Asshole Award" locked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Somebody's ass needs to be in a big fat sling,
and they can start with Baucus and work their way through GrASSly to the staffer, who, if he/she, had shown up at my house, would have to have good health insurance. Having a tape measure removed from one's ass has to be expensive. Entertaining, but expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why are they putting up with that shit?
People are getting rolled everywhere. I'll bet there is a "minority" staffer on every committee looking into what they can about appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Could you, for one minute, imagine one of the old-time Dems
putting up with this shit? LBJ would have invited them to his ranch for BBQ (as the main course, naturally)! Jeebus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. They would only try it once. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. This sounds like obstructionism, plain and simple.
They're doing everything they can to slow down the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. They call it bipartisanship. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lagomorph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. Like Eddie Murphy said...
"How would you like me to have the IRS come down here and crawl up your ass with a fucking microscope?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. I Think Somebody Needs To Investigate This Staffer And His Deductions........
sounds to me like he knows all the angles and probably has used them. Maybe someone should dredge up some dirt on this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC