Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.N. Guide for Sex Ed Generates Opposition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:55 AM
Original message
U.N. Guide for Sex Ed Generates Opposition
U.N. Guide for Sex Ed Generates Opposition

Published: September 2, 2009

PARIS — A set of proposed international sex education guidelines aimed at reducing H.I.V. infections among young people has provoked criticism from conservative groups that say the program would be too explicit for young children and promote access to legal abortion as a right.

The guidelines, scheduled to be released by Unesco in a new draft next week, would be distributed to education ministries, school systems and teachers around the world to help guide teachers in what to teach young people about their bodies, sex, relationships and sexually transmitted diseases. They would address four different age groups.

“In the absence of a vaccine for AIDS, education is the only vaccine we have,” said Mark Richmond, Unesco’s global coordinator for H.I.V. and AIDS and the director of the division that coordinates educational priorities. “Only 40 percent of young people aged 15 to 24 have accurate knowledge” of how the disease is transmitted, he said, even though that age group “accounts for 45 percent of all new cases.”

But the conservative criticism has already caused one of the key participating and donor agencies, the United Nations Population Fund, to pull back from the project and ask that its name be edited out of the published material, United Nations officials said.

A Population Fund official, reached in New York, said Tuesday that the fund wanted changes to the text. “Discussions are ongoing to make the publication more effective and adaptable by countries, so it may better serve countries as guidelines for use in national educational systems,” the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the delicacy of the matter.

A draft issued in June has been attacked by conservative and religious groups, mainly in the United States, for recommending discussions of homosexuality, describing sexual abstinence as “only one of a range of choices available to young people” to prevent disease and unwanted pregnancy, and suggesting a discussion of masturbation with children as young as 5.

“If you ever have a situation where kids need to be taught earlier than their adolescence, this is not the way to do it,” said Colin Mason of the Population Research Institute, an anti-abortion organization based in Virginia. “It’s very graphic and encourages practices like masturbation, which conservative Christians and others feel are wrong.”


The diversity of views around the world on these issues renders any universal approach “culturally insensitive,” Mr. Mason said. “We think it’s a kind of one-size-fits-all approach that’s damaging to cultures, religions and to children,” he said.
The barrage of criticism has put Unesco, the United Nations agency charged with advancing education and culture worldwide, on the defensive. The agency has removed the June draft of the guidelines from its Web site, and delayed the release of the final document.

“Unfortunately, the way the guidelines have been presented by certain media has provoked some fairly aggressive reactions, mainly in the form of virulent comment on conservative American Web sites, but also via some very nasty e-mails directed at the two co-authors as well as certain Unesco staff,” said Sue Williams, the spokeswoman for the agency, which is based in Paris.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/world/03unesco.html?_r=1&ref=world



THAT WOULD CERTAINLY MAKE FOR SOME GOOD READING ON SCHOOL TV . . . !!!

Go UN -- !!!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
create.peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. what DOESN'T provoke opposition (read 'fear') in these people!nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. You've gotta kinda admit that the subject of MASTURBATION hasn't been
heard since Surgeon General Jocelyn Elders -- hope that's her name!!

She was a sensation -- best SG we ever had!!!

Kids need to know these things -- and it is immoral to keep this info about

normal human sexuality from them!

But, right now we have GOP nuts running for their guns because Obama wanted to

tell school kids to stay in school --

It's the parents who need educations -- especially the religious fanatics!!!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Anti-contraceptive, but still "Pro-Life"?
I think it's time to label these filthy minded freaks for what they are: "Pro-HIV", "Pro-Poverty" and "Misogynistic", and "abortion" is their dog-whistle.

They can spout off all they want about "cultural sensitivity", but they have made it abundantly clear that their sole goal is to force their own twisted morality on the rest of the world - at whatever cost. Their Crusade is little different and no better than any that have come before, but they have the potential to kill far more people today with their willful ignorance and hate than at any other time in history.

Someone needs to remind these fundy wackjobs that there are only 144,000 places in Heaven for the faithful (according to my Dad's fundy church). Do they really want to increase competition for those slots by converting the unwashed masses by the tens of millions? Oh shit, I forgot. They'll need servants in Heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bravo -- !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Of course the criticism comes "mainly from the United States." bleh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Pathetic huh?
Yep, somehow with all that we still have more abortions, teen pregnancy, and a higher infant mortality rate than those Godless heathen countries that teach their kids something other than "if you want to fuck...well don't".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well five may be a bit young for talk of masturbation
but fifteen may be too late to discuss contraceptives and AIDS prevention. I think maybe around 8-10 for masturbation talk and maybe 12-13 for the rest.

Then again, considering how prevalent AIDS is in so many countries, the earlier the better. The ages are all just arbitrary anyways. What's important is saving lives...and it's important to educate kids before they start messin' around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The RCC will teach kids they have no right to touch themselves . . .
at the earliest age they can get ahold of them!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC