Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We should have started off demanding Single Payer or Medicare for all

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 06:47 AM
Original message
We should have started off demanding Single Payer or Medicare for all
Than we might have got the Public Option as a compromise.

Instead we started off what we thought we could get and not what we wanted and we will get shit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jeffbr Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. The whole thing is prearranged & preordained
Follow the money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. We shouldn't have 'demanded' anything
Just go ahead and do it. Lower the eligibility age for Medicare to 62, then 60, then 58, then 55, etc. Listening to honest open debate and demands has no meaning to Republicans, they just do what they want by any legislative or executive maneuver available. Like invading Iraq -- Dimbulb said he was going to, the Repubs wrote some hideously unconstitutional "authorization" bill, and he went ahead and did it. If the Democrats were crafty and not beholden to the insurance companies, they would have figured out a way to pull the rug out from under them by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. People let a very big fact slip right past them -
it used to be that Medicare was open to women at age 62.

That disappeared when Fuckface implemented his Plan B strategy a few years ago. Very quietly, with no one noticing, a huge segment of the population was suddenly no longer eligible for Medicare at age 62.

Slick, huh? Talk about rugs being pulled - and not a peep out of anyone when this happened...............................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. I agree.
The problem is "we", as in the taxpayers, have never had a seat at this table. We'll be lucky to be allowed to sweep up the crumbs and be expected to be grateful for the opportunity before this is all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. John Edwards predicted this outcome more than 2 1/2 years ago
"Some people argue that we’re going to sit at a table with these people and they’re going to voluntarily give their power away. I think it is a complete fantasy; it will never happen."

Big Table Fantasies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. +1000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Yep, Edwards knew that kicking corporate ass to the curb is the only way to get things done. nt
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 04:21 PM by earth mom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. BINGO!!! The negotiating table was tilted to the right from the very beginning. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bingo! KNR
Herein lies the difference between Obama and Ted Kennedy:

Kennedy would start from the left and negotiate towards a middle ground. Obama appears to start from the middle and negotiate towards the right.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why is Obama kow towing to the insurance industry???
That's what I want to know.

Why isn't he fighting for US.

We voted for change. Healthcare was a part of his platform and the topic of many of
his speeches.

Why isn't he out in front---all over the country--the way George Bush was when he went on
his PR tour, trying to convince us all that Social Security should be privatized?

Who is advocating for US????

Three months ago, there was a disgusting video on You Tube of an insurance-industry lobbyist
who was arguing with someone about healthcare reform. The guy was a snake. The insurance
company set up stakes in DC three months ago. They've all ready visited our Congress members
and had round tables with the Presidents. Deals have been brokered. Promises have been made.
Campaign contributions have been promised.

It's over with.

We're just now learning about the results of those meetings.

I'm just still stunned...that Obama isn't fighting for us. We all voted for the opposite of George Bush and
healthcare reform is one of the top three issues in the Dem party right now.

We have a majority in the Senate, in the House and we have the White House. If it doesn't happen now, it never
will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. A least two possible answers (perhaps I should set up a poll):
__ He never intended to fight for US. It was all a scam

__ He DID intend to fight for us, but he is being threatened (literally or figuratively) not to

Oh yeah. And one more for the delusional

__ Pres. Obama is an amazing chess player. We just don't realize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Get it right
he is playing multi dimensional chess

:-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Whoops! Sorry! My bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. He's still getting his ass kicked at checkers.
And that is the bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Look, you will have to talk to the fanbase about that
chorus and all that...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. I pick - - he never intended to fight for US. It was all a scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. I created a poll that addresses this question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. Democrats have no clue how to negotiate
We'll never get any where until they evolve spines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Are you sure they even WANT spines?
Oh sure, some of them do -- and some of them actually have them -- but I suspect that many of them are stalwartly serving their true constituency: large corporations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Exactly- they have PLENTY of spine when it comes to standing down "the far left of the left."
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Now that there is the REAL flag of the USA. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. It's not about spine- the DLCers simply never wanted a public option, spine or not
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yes, we should have. This is one of those incredibly clear and obvious conclusions one draws .......
..... when one views events in hindsight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yeah, I gotta say it made no sense to start with the least we could accept
So, I find myself wondering if they ever wanted real reform to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Many aspects of our sham rep democracy are like that - only make sen$e when viewed backward...
... from the accepted, stated position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. No better to capitulate 4 years before the battle
As they did with the PUBLIC OPTION bandwagon.

What we should be yelling for is a VA type system and then acccept Medicare For All as a compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. What you mean "We"???
The problem of course is that "we" were never asked. OF COURSE we should have demanded single payer as a starting point for negotiations. But guess who was never invited to the table in the first place? Why right you are, single-payer advocates.

It's all done by design, and "we" don't have a voice in it.

Bastids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. But the Blue Dogs & the DLCers and the Republicans don't WANT a public option. Dont you get it?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
30. knr - what message was sent to the corporations when they were
invited to the WH summit and single-payer advocates were left standing, almost literally, at the WH gates.

If you wanted a strong public option then you at least allow SP advocates in the room.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC