Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poverty Among Seniors At Surprising High - 19% Estimate Is Nearly Double What Was Previously Thought

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 03:11 PM
Original message
Poverty Among Seniors At Surprising High - 19% Estimate Is Nearly Double What Was Previously Thought

Sep 4, 2009 11:44 am US/Pacific
Poverty Among Seniors At Surprising High
19 Percent Estimate Is Nearly Double What Was Previously Thought

WASHINGTON (AP) ― The poverty rate among older Americans could be nearly twice as high as the traditional 10 percent level, according to a revision of a half-century-old formula for calculating medical costs and geographic variations in the cost of living.

The National Academy of Science's formula, which is gaining credibility with public officials including some in the Obama administration, would put the poverty rate for Americans 65 and over at 18.6 percent, or 6.8 million people, compared with 9.7 percent, or 3.6 million people, under the existing measure. The original government formula, created in 1955, doesn't take account of rising costs of medical care and other factors.

"It's a hidden problem," said Robin Talbert, president of the AARP Foundation, which provides job training and support to low-income seniors and is backing legislation that would adopt the NAS formula. "There are still many millions of older people on the edge, who don't have what they need to get by."

If the academy's formula is adopted, a more refined picture of American poverty could emerge that would capture everyday costs of necessities besides just food. The result could upend long-standing notions of those in greatest need and lead eventually to shifts in how billions of federal dollars for the poor are distributed for health, housing, nutrition and child-care benefits.

more...
http://cbs13.com/cbsnational/senior.citizens.poverty.2.1164568.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Damn
However we are in many ways not a wealthy country. About 10% owns nearly 70%+ of the wages and wealth, which means the other 270 million have to split about 5 trillion in wages and wealth.

Its going to get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is why a more progressive tax system
And a functioning social safety net is needed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Fuck socialism!"
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. With Blue Dogs and DLC running the show, the numbers will
increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No doubt
Their supporters are already touting the CPI index which is BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe this will counter some of the claims
that we are spending too much money on seniors, which is generally said in conjunction with the notion that money should be spend on children instead. We don't spend enough money on either group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. .
:kick:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC