Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Too Fat to be a Model?" (UK Guardian) **WARNING** Tastefully covered nude inside

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:18 PM
Original message
"Too Fat to be a Model?" (UK Guardian) **WARNING** Tastefully covered nude inside
She's a pretty lady....

"Lizzie Miller, the 20-year-old model in question, agrees that it's astonishing that, at 5 ft 11 in and 12.5 stone she's considered a "plus size" model. "It's sad," she says. "In the industry anything over size six is considered a plus-size." Miller, who is around a US size 12-14 (that is, either average or slightly below average) lost about 60lb when she was 13 but today she is considered too large to model for plus-size lines Marina Rinaldi (she says, "they like girls who are an 8-10") or Elena Miro. She says that the overwhelming reaction to the tiny photograph, buried on page 194 of Glamour magazine "shows that the world is hungry to see pictures of normal women."

One wouldn't have thought this would be news. As Miller says, "pretty much every picture in a magazine or ad is airbrushed . . . I don't think the public understands how much smoke and mirrors are involved in making women look like that."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/sep/02/lizzie-miller-model-fat

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. The fashion industry is most contemptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Right?
No wonder so many girls and women have body image issues. There's absolutely nothing wrong with her....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
54. Wrong with her?
Man, I can think of several, I mean severl, things right with her. It is a pity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. They all seem to want to dress young drag queens
There is very little respect for the normal female body.

Even catalogs for plus size clothing show it modeled by hat rack sized women.

Guys, wobbly bits are normal. Breasts are normal. Cellulite is normal. Being over 16 years old is normal.

Being female is normal.

Dammit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. *applause*
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 04:42 PM by AspenRose
"There is very little respect for the normal female body."
:thumbsup:

That's basically the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. On plus sized catalogs...
You are exactly right...I get a lot of those plus sized catalogs, and most of them do feature clothing being modeled by women I would not categorize as being "plus" sized. Although they technically probably are, as they look like they're probably size 12s or something.

I can't even count the numbers of times I've bought something from one of those catalogs thinking it was going to look as good on me as it does on the model and it's a huge letdown every time.

The only catalogs I receive that do actually use plus sized models are Junonia and Making It Big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
101. Yes,
and being thin is normal, too for many women. I have no problem with models being thin.

They do not define what womanhood should be. They simply model clothes.

It is ridiculous that models should be singled out for such hostility. I think that women sometimes channel their anger at the wrong people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #101
110. The article is about an average sized woman turned down for plus sized modeling
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 07:32 PM by AspenRose
because they thought she was too big.

I can't speak for anyone else here, but to be honest, thin models didn't even come up on my radar. What DID come up was how unrealistic the modeling industry is, when they tell a woman who is "plus sized" that she's too big to model their clothes and would rather have a size 8-10 model plus sized clothing for plus sized women. That just doesn't make any sense.

No hostility towards the model....plenty of "hostility" at the industry, though. :hi:

I would also add that since we've got weight and image issues in this country, I would offer the suggestion that perhaps "normal" isn't the right word, but women looking like this lady are the "norm." The average American woman wears a size 14.

I'm certainly not going to suggest that thin women aren't "normal." I can see where you'd get that impression, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #110
120. nicely said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
130. Again, the idea is to sell clothes
The clothes look better on abnormally skinny models and thus people are tricked into thinking the clothes will look that good on them and they buy the clothes. Being a model isn't the epitome of sexiness and guys who think that don't know what they look like when they aren't airbrushed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course it's news... only stick women are supposed to be shown as sexy.
"Plus size" women are only to be used as examples in "before and after" weight loss adds.

Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. She lost 60 lbs a few years prior to this picture
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 04:24 PM by AspenRose
And they STILL think she's too big. For Plus Size!!! Crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's their idea of "fat"??
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. She falls into the very upper end of 'normal'
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 04:31 PM by redqueen
based on the BMI.

As for fashion, hollywood, etc... yes... she's 'fat.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think her problem is her shape.
She is lean at the top and heavy at the bottom. I certainly would not put her in the PLUS size.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. it isnt her problem. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
53. Good catch
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm sure the "plus size" models get a lot of work
Posing for Macys ads, Lane Bryant, etc.

"Anything over size 6 is considered plus-size..."
Well, obviously. It seems to be more like anything over size 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wasn't Marilyn Monroe a US size 12-14?
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 05:23 PM by AspenRose


Edit to add: I stand corrected. Snopes said she was an 8 to 10, but they also mention that clothing sizes have changed over the years

http://www.snopes.com/movies/actors/mmdress.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yep
That famous white dress of hers was a current size 14.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. No way.
I've seen some of her clothes in person. She was tiny, maybe 5'3". I'm a size 2 and I think I could have comfortably worn her jeans. She did have curves, though, and she knew how to accentuate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. You're a size 2 and your thighs look like hers in that pic?
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 05:15 PM by redqueen
How about your hips, upper arms & butt? About the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #38
125. Siznig has changed drastically.
I am one of the much hated "skinny" people. Don't do anything to be this way, just the way I am. Anyhow, shopping is a nightmare for me. Size 4 nowadays means a 32" waist and 40" hips, at least. Since when does XS mean 40" chest??

Yeah, sizing's changed. I'd wager MM would wear a current size 4 or so.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #125
133. I think I quite clearly already acknowledged that... my question was:
Does a size two (or four) have thighs, upper arms, hips and a butt like that?

It's a very straightforward question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #133
134. Hate to answer a question with a question
but are you talking today's size 2/4 or from MM's day? In my mind, no, she's not a size 2 or 4 but today's clothing maker's may disagree.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #134
135. Please... if that was a size 2 or 4, then... what would it be today?
Edited on Mon Sep-07-09 10:10 AM by redqueen
Why is this so hard for people to admit or discuss rationally?

Why the desire to cling so desperately to the idea that she was "tiny"... she was not tiny in that pic... not by a longshot.

As I said above, I find it very sad that people use her - a woman who struggled with her weight, and was given a hard time about it by the studio bosses at the time - to try to push this "smaller is sexier" bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #135
136. Ok, take a deep breath
I don't contend MM was "tiny". Not at all. I am "tiny" so I rarely mistake those who are not to be so.

You seem a bit wound up on this topic, too much so as you are misreading my posts. I tend to agree with you. There has been a huge effort to provide women with an unrealistic, unattainable ideal. So much so that we now have "vanity" sizing. 40" chest, 32" waist and 42" hips, yes, you are now, magically, a size 4! Congratulations. Get those measurements down to 36", 30" and 38" and you'll be a zero! Oy. It's ridiculous on several fronts.

Julie--not sure where the hostility is coming from
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #125
137. I can confirm that sizing has changed drastically.
When I was in my 20s, 30s and 40s, I weighed 125-130. I'm 5'3-1/2." At that time, I wore a size 9. Then in my 50s and 60s, I jumped up to size 11-12 because I gained 15 pounds. I have since lost the weight, but now I can wear some 6s. But sizes 7-8 fit fine. So, if I am the same weight as I was many years ago, why am I now wearing a smaller dress size?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. A size 12-14 of the bygone era translates to about a 6 or 8 today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Her size was judged by current standards. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Maybe a 12-14 of 10 years ago. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. And here we go with this again...
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 04:54 PM by redqueen
Look at her thighs, butt, upper arms and waist there... she was not a size 6... doubt she was even an 8... I looked a hell of lot thinner than that as an 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. People get confused because of the rampant "size inflation" that has been going on.
All you have to do is check the size labels on vintage clothing to know that an 8 of the 1950s was really skinny, and an 8 in 1982 was pretty darn slim. An 8 in 2009 means you might want to go to the gym before you wear a bikini in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Yes, that muddies the issue...
as does the fact that many people like to cite her lowest weight and leave it at that.

The fact is, the studio execs harped on her for her weight, and she had issues with it. Anyone can look at that picture, or other pictures, and see that she was not a size 6 or 8.

It's really sad that people *insist* on using her that way... a woman who struggled with her weight herself... to try to continue this nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. ooooooooo, I wore Size 8 in 1982!
:woohoo:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. I read an article last year...
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 04:28 PM by Xithras
...about how the porn industry was caught offguard by the explosion of websites that show amateur video, and how they're swallowing up a lions share of the market. It turns out that, when given a real choice, people would much rather look at REAL women, than look at silicone injected, airbrushed, surgically sculpted fakes.

I know that's not directly related to the article on Lizzie Miller, but it's more evidence to show how out of touch marketers in all parts of the media are with the real tastes of average people.

And the picture of the stunningly beautiful naked woman jogged the memory. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. It's a shame when women aren't encouraged to embrace their natural beauty
Of course, women have the choice to do whatever they'd like with their bodies, but it's just so sad to see girls influenced at such a young age....that somehow they aren't good enough as they are. And that they feel they have to endure illness (anorexia), surgery, pain and scars to be thought of as acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm 5' 8" and was once anorexic, weighing only 92 pounds
at the same height. I wore a size 7 then. Some women will NEVER be a size 0 no matter how much they starve themselves. The width of their pelvic bones and shoulders won't permit it. Young girls are being lead to believe that if they are any bigger than a size 6 they are "too fat", and that can and does lead to the death of some of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
64. I'm 5'7 and I used to be 120
and a size 12.

I have BIG hips. BIG I tell ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
66. I'm 5'4" & in college was 110 lbs--skinny but not anorexic. That's when I discovered my shoulders &
... hips absolutely would not go down another size to what my taller, more bosomy roommate wore. You are absolutely right about bone structure: Even if I had been consciously starving myself (and I'm so sorry you were) the bones were not going to permit it.

The issue with really young girls is shocking: my slender daughter said something to me about her "fat thighs" when she was in 5th grade. I about choked. By the time she was in 7th grade one of her 8th grade friends she'd known since grade school had become seriously anorexic. As I write this I wonder if it was that girl who was already talking about supposedly fat thighs a few years previously. :-(

Hekate



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why want to be a model in the first place?
It only feeds this sexist bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. She Has Beautiful Skin
From what the picture shows, she has simply gorgeous skin. I mean, they could have airbrushed blemishes, stretchmarks, etc, But it doesn't look like she has cellulite and her complexion seems to have a really nice, soft glow. Yeah, she's bottom heavy, but that pouch at her stomach looks more like left overs from weight loss or just that natural bit of gut that healthy women who don't starve themselves and/or obsessively train have. Look at her face too - it doesn't seem she's packing extra pounds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. Most women have cellulite and stretch marks..
to one degree or another. It can't be that repulsive, or evolution would have taken care of it long ago. I saw a show a few years ago where a young bride to be in Africa was concerned that her arranged husband would be disappointed in her because she didn't have enough stretch marks. I guess in at least one culture, they are considered desirable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kumbaya Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #42
117. Where in Africa?
Women right now are jamming the phone lines for one-way tickets to that country in the continent!:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. Mandatory Figure Drawing Classes for ALL
My daughter had the great fortune to study with one of the best figure
drawing teachers in the country.
I had the fortune to observe him work with students.

He is one of the most brilliant educators I have ever encountered.
In one of our discussions he once mentioned his selection of models
for the classes he taught. He very purposely selected models
of all ages, body types and races. He told me that
he felt it was important for young people to study/draw older people
so that they would understand and embrace aging.
He felt that it was important for them to study bodies that did
not fit the corporate inflicted media types-

My daughter and the other students fortunate enough to experience
his tutelage have grown into very self accepting young adults.

If everyone took figure drawing studies with this man,
the world would be a very different place.

There is beauty in everyone at any age.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. Now THAT is very cool.
I especially appreciate the variance in ages and ethnicities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. He is a genius, that man. Too bad he retired.
We became very close friends and I have learned a great deal from him.
As did every student he ever touched over his 40 years of teaching.
Never missed a day in FORTY years.
Can you imagine that????

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
118. In science fiction fandom, bigger is usually
well received. When you look at some of the poster art by such luminaries as Kelly Freas, Boris Vallejo and others, it's hard to picture Twiggy or someone anorexic wearing battle armor. Think of Xena, and it says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. That's why men and women come in all sizes and shapes..
everyone can find someone they like. That roll of fat around the midsection is a turnoff for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. The issue isn't what sizes people come in... it's that only one size is depicted as acceptable.
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 04:49 PM by redqueen
Duh.

Oh, sorry... on edit... this applies pretty much only to women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I completely agree and hope I didn't come off as sounding like they should all be thin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
83. also, only one age is acceptable--
for women, that is....

godDAMMIT I hate corporate media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #83
94. Yep... and that reminds me of one of my pet peeves...
when people admire actresses and such for looking young... I wish they'd say "she has a great plastic surgeon!" instead of "She looks so great"

Let's be honest about it... they nearly all aren't young looking for any other reason than that.

And if we're going to further the cult of youth-worshipping, let's be up-front about which industry we're advertising for... shall we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #94
124. verily, you speak the truth.
ha, I hadn't thought of that! But so true!

I just want to hurl at the ads for whatever youth-spackle that always feature a 19 year old ... to show you it works! Or, on a much more tasteless level, the relentless ads on yahoo with horrible scary animations of a hag-faced woman...scroll over to see the years wiped away!! I'd like to personally choke the little 30 year old ad-boys who come up with that crap.

Naomi Wolf wrote The Beauty Myth, but I think what's really so repressive and objectionable is the beauty dictate and the cultural screening of all women behind an image of impossible changeless perfect youthful beauty. (a mostly white image. Seems black women are not quite so beholden to the demand that they exist only as beauteous young personality-free fetishes)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #124
127. I think I'll start spamming the ubiquitous 'doesn't this old person look so great!' threads
with comments about what a fantastic plastic surgeon they must have. :)

And re: race yeah, the whole 'black don't crack' saying comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
create.peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #24
59. your saying that is a turn-off for me, and you might have cared when i was young and had no stomach.
i was 117 and 5-7 and thought i was fat. i had no stomach. you have been brainwashed, as i was then....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
72. Yeah, well that's just how some people are built.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. And what is wrong with this woman's body? She's beautiful & completely real.
From one female to another I say: Go girl, you sexy woman you!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
28. In reality, many of us are size 6. My left thigh is a size 6 and so is my right.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #28
65. I'm a size 6
in dog sizes. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. My wife is 5'4" and weighs exactly 160. Sexiest thing in the fucking WORLD to me.
I want her to get down about 25 lbs. or so in the time it will take me to cut my own weight by half, and we're both eating very healthy and doing things right to that end.

Still, I'll never be attracted to women who are sickly thin.

The model in the OP is damn sexy too, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. You're my kind of man! (Don't tell your wife...)
Not to be too flirty or anything, but I simply LOVE a guy
who thinks his wife is sexy, no matter what shape or size.
To me, you are a REAL man, because it takes self confidence
to love a woman who is SEXY.
Sexy is not a shape, it is an ATTITUDE and self confidence.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. healthy is the key... for all of us. a person feels better, moves better
healthy is good.

big thumbs up to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. You need to be cloned.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #30
55. You rock. I am 5'4 and have gone anywhere from 138 to 160.
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 07:19 PM by Jennicut
I want to get down to where I was before I had my kids, 138 to 140. I have diabetes so its a struggle. My hubby and I are eating better together and exercising. Hope it works out for you guys. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
40. What they're not telling you: she's too TALL to be a model
She is absolutely beautiful in the face. She's got a bit of tummy flab, but if she's not modeling swimsuits or skin-tight jeans that's not really going to come into play. The sticking point here is she's damn near six feet tall--the average man's height. Put her in a shot with a five-six model and the other girl will come up to Lizzie's nose. Not good. And when the client comes in with a case of clothes to use in a shoot, all the clothes will be cut for an average-height woman, not someone six feet tall.

I wonder if she can act. That might be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. but models arent 5'6". try 6 feet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Yeah 5'6 is way too short for runway... Kate Moss is 5'7 but she is a rarity
She got very lucky becoming Calvin Klein's muse. The ideal model height is between 5'9" and 6'. Sometimes there are problems with too tall girls (well over 6") but that is pretty rare and many women who are beautiful enough to be in the industry are turned away for being too short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DKRC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. The closer to 6' the better
I don't know of any agency ever looking for 5'6" models. I hit 6' at 12 and was being groomed for a runway in Europe at 14. The deal breaker for me was the requirement that I drop from 150 to 110 at 6'. I told the recruiter I would look like a bone & a hank of hair, but that was what they were looking for. No thanks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
93. being Tall is a plus in the modeling industry, it's short women who have a problem getting in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
43. YUMMY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
45. I've seen this photo several times now
I just love looking at it. After all, the vast majority of women look more like Lizzi Miller than Kate Moss.

I also have to hand it to her for having the guts to pose naked. Then again, if I looked like her, I'd never wear clothes. ;-) :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
48. The fashion industry is completely out of whack... their idea of "plus size" is absurd
You will size 10-12 women advertising plus size clothing and they don't even properly fill out the clothes they are advertising. It is the stupidest thing. It is quite obvious when a person is starving themselves to be a certain size vs. being naturally very thin. They argue that very thin women model clothing to a better effect than larger women but in my opinion, seeing women who are clearly starving themselves strut down a runway is very off-putting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
49. This woman is beautiful by any standard!
These fashionazis would probably have rejected Marilyn Monroe for the same reason!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
50. I am 5 ft. 10-1/2 ins. tall....
....and a size 12 is not at all large for someone as tall as me. For me to wear a size 10, I weigh around 127 - 137 pounds and that is not that much when one considers how tall I am. Yes, that is a loose size 10, but I have never liked tight clothing.

The model is about 175 pounds at nearly 6 ft. tall ~~ not overweight in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
52. that's too fat? well, maybe for a runway model ...
but I think she looks beautiful ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
56. some of the comments are pretty damn funny
pikeman
02 Sep 09, 10:24am
Maybe after reporting the "deluge of emails", Guardian Weekend could "make a commitment to" showing more pictures of naked women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
57. Narrow definitions of beauty to me are a form of subtle repression
by the industry that sells all the surgery and products....It seems like women have been turned into plastic over the last 20 years, made into objects. I love this photo, she is so natural and happy, a state of being, not a look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #57
68. I also find it funny how few seem to make the connection between the...
...narrow definition of beauty that you talk about and the (much more inflammatory) nature of racism based equally superficial traits like skin color.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #68
76. How far have we wandered
from natural looks, was it 30 years ago? I used to love all the many ways people could just be themselves, natural hair, and styles that were obviously individual preference. People were coming out as themselves, and that to me is the ultimate beauty, a person's true essence.

Today so many people are outwardly driven, they define themselves as how they are seen, not how they see themselves. My gods women go through so much pain and expense to look beautiful. All their surgical sites end up being numb, numb lips, nipples, faces, so they give up personal pleasure for a look. Not to mention all the noxious chemicals applied to hair, when it can be conditioned with natural oils. Oh, don't get me started.

I know it is personal choice, but I also miss seeing women of color wearing their hair natural, to me it looked so proud. I want to see Chris Rocks movie Good Hair, he made it to honor his daughter, who asked him why she didn't have good hair. God I miss seeing people happy from the inside, truly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #76
86. I agree. On a much more, erm, "adult" (I guess) note, I was watching...
...and interview on CNN with some major player in the pornography industry. They were a distribution house and were charged with purchasing the rights for videos for distribution. It was probably during one of those big porn expos that go down in Vegas, the ones that are timed to coincide with the big E3 videogame expo, I think.

Anyway, the interviewer asked them "What types of adult movies are your best sellers?" And the guy replied something like "You'd be surprised, but our biggest sales in a specific genre come from amateur videos whether the women do not look like supermodels. We get lots of requests for what a lot of people would consider overweight, older women. Not what you'd normally think of as a porn star." That's decently close to what he said, anyway.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #76
95. Love this post.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #57
85. It amazes me how many women are falling for this shit. Idiots.
How many men get surgery to enhance their appearances compared to women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #85
96. LOL... no, men aren't pressured about looks though, DUH
men are pressured in other ways, and equal numbers fall for it, so don't be so cocky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #96
98. We aren't spending billions on surgery, make-up, beauty salon services, and crash diet
plans for a fucking look. Carry on now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #98
99. No... just stupidly overpriced sportscars, hair plugs, and boner pills
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. Sports cars and boner pills? What do they have to do with a man's
physical appearance? I'll give you hair plugs, but they aren't as common as all the shit women do to their hair: braids, extensions, perms, tint, the list goes on. Suckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #100
107. Uh... I already said... men aren't under that much pressure about their appearance... DUH
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 07:17 PM by redqueen
It's mostly just women that get that.

Maybe you'll get it this time.


I wonder how much men spend on all those stupid scams trying to make their dicks bigger... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #107
121. My point from the beggining is that women spend tons of money
to improve their looks because society demands they look a certain way. This thread is about physical appearance. Try to stay on topic. Speaking of genital surgery, maybe you missed that thread about women going under the knife to change the shape of their vagina. Stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #121
126. Yeah, you want to call women names for it... but you don't call men names for doing the same thing..
cause you're a fucking hypocrite with a sickening, nasty attitude.

I get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #57
92. They don't strike me as terribly subtle. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocky Sullivan Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
58. She's a goodlooking girl, but that paunch looks a tad wrecked.
For a model, that is. Her size isn't the issue so much as the flab on the belly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. Heh heh, oh I'd wreck that paunch!


PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocky Sullivan Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. LOL! Check out that Pauncherello!
Boo-yah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaYellowDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
62. She's quite attractive...
... too bad she's so damn young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
63. Gross!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unrepentant Fenian Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #63
67. Fuzz, I'm with you. That gut is gross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #67
73. That's pretty damn sad. Some people are just built that way.
You people make me sick. Post YOUR pics and let us judge YOU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. and if they think any model's photo isn't photoshopped to delete any imperfections
they are just ignorant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #73
77. are you fuckin kidding. the whole reason for these posts is so they can feel like a man
not that they are much of one, hence why the need to mouth off like this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #73
87. Fat rolls ain't sexy, sorry. Why is that sick exactly? Do you find beer bellied guys sexy?
If you're honest, I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chatnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #87
97. I'd hardly call a pooch a "fat roll"
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 06:39 PM by chatnoir
She looks pretty damn normal here:




Edit for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomTrain Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #97
132. That's a sexy tummy if I ever saw one
You know, a tummy has to actually exist for it to be able to be sexy. Those anorectic "models" who have no tummy whatsoever (i.e. flat ones) I don't care one bit for. Real men like women with shapes and curves. This girl is very hot (and in the real world, of very average size), and if the fashionistas don't think so, they can go fuck themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #87
102. Whatever, Chimpy (I'm his wife). He's skinny bones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moriah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #87
105. That's not a fat roll.
She likely weighed a bit more than she does now at one point -- not a lot more -- and has a bit of loose skin on her lower belly. Leaning over like that just emphasized it.

If you saw her standing up straight and clothed at a bar, you'd probably think she was hot, and any man who would say "Gross" if she took her clothes off and showed that body probably doesn't get laid very much. Because that's what a real woman looks like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #73
104. And some people are built
tall and thin. They get crucified on this board, too.

A lot of nasty, judgmental people turn out whenever weight is discussed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #67
128. Are You Fucking KIDDING ME ???
She is sitting down, and leaning forward...

That is gonna make a roll on ANYONE!

If she did not have that, then she would not be able to lay down, or stand upright!!!

Apparently you haven't been around many naked women. Or men for that matter.

Jesus...

Go play with your keyboard.

:wtf:

BTW - The woman is absolutely gorgeous!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
69. It does look like she has a bit of a FUPA showing there.
Maybe it's just the way she's sitting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
70. Thank gawd for the stone. Whenever people make fun of our units system...
can point to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
71. I think she's cute. Fuck the fashion nazis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndersDame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
75. Heh i knew a model who was teased all her life for being skinny ;always envious of curvy girls
then she moved to a bigger city started her modeling career (not a famous model) After she had her kid she finally got to wear a b cup and was a whopping 107. I think that skinny (ones who are natural twigs not so much by purging or starving themselves) girls are pretty and so are curvy girls and so are athletic girls .I am so glad we all come in different shapes and size otherwise it would be boring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
78. Still a little skinny for my tastes...
But still quite attractive in my book.

Now if she's got good intellect, a razor wit, and a nice geeky gamer thing going, then her attractiveness would go right through the celing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. ahhhhh man, dontcha know. you are not playing the guy game
more man than some of the others on htis thread. smarter too. probably happier too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. What can I say? I like geeky women.
Brains over looks any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. geeky women are fun. geeky men are fun. married one
have two boys that are. this from a person who is in no way geeky, which makes it all the more fun for me. they keep me laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndersDame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #82
88. I love being able to snuggle on the couch and watch Trek together
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #82
119. Geeks are better in bed.
Obsession with a topic, and caring about details, has some benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
81. Ever see Leonard Nimoy's Full Body Project?
Now those are some zaftig models, and his clear appreciation of what he calls "the goddess in all women" (bless his heart) results in very large nudes who are joyous, graceful, and beautiful. I won't go into health issues because that's a different topic, but as a woman who struggles to be a size 16 I very much apreciate that I can be recognized as potentially physically wonderful by someone right NOW, not in some vague future when I get to be the "right" number on a tag or a scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
84. I'll say it again: That ain't plus size. That's actual size.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #84
103. I like the way you said that!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
89. Yea she probably is too fat to be a model, doesn't make her unattractive
Models are essentially walking clothes hangers. They are not modeling themselves, they are modeling the clothes that they are wearing. The clothes look really good on abnormally skinny people and thus they are going to use abnormally skinny models because the idea is to sell clothes. People need to realize that being a model doesn't make you the epitome of sexiness, it just means that clothes look good on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #89
106. I would agree with you except she was turned down for PLUS SIZE modeling
They thought she was TOO BIG for PLUS SIZE modeling. (Which is just crazy.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #106
113. Thats f'ed up
Looks do matter in life, but we've gotten way too neurotic in this culture about them. Its better to be fat, pockmarked and a nice person who is happy with yourself than to be thin, clear skinned and miserable, hateful or neurotic.

Most women will never look as good as the model in the photo does. If she is supposed to be ashamed of herself, then what are all the women who don't look as good as her supposed to think about themselves? Obvious question, but it is rhetorical.

Anyway, looks matter but not as much as people seem to think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #106
131. Wouldn't surprise me at all
Again, the idea is to sell clothes. If somebody sees a model wearing something and that it is "plus size" they will probably make the assumption that it will look good on them when in reality the model isn't "plus sized" by any means. Just like most advertising, models are not depicting reality. Reality doesn't sell nearly as much as fantasy does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #89
109. Exactly!
It is about the clothes. No one is saying that average or large sized people have to be skinny to be acceptable.

Thin models are needed because too many curves would distract from the lines of the clothing.

I cannot understand the hostility some people have against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
90. I blame George Balanchine & Coco
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 04:10 PM by aikoaiko


eta:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
91. The sizing game is absurd
That's become especially clear with size 0.

What is that if not a negation of self?

An absolute erasure.

And that's what they want us to aspire to?

No thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #91
111. It is absurd, isn't it?
And you aren't a "Woman" unless you wear larger sizes. Otherwise, you are a "missy" or a "junior".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #111
129. Great point
All attempts to diminish, both in size and age.

And it can still be harder to find decent styles and natural fabrics in Plus and Woman, though that has become better, mostly through demand from women not because the designers pushed this.

The mint green poly pantsuit (my mother's generation's bane) has morphed to the overly busy, multi colored, poly top.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
108. She's flubby, sorry
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 07:33 PM by Sultana
nothing attractive about that stomach.

She's 20?

Shit, I thought she's in her 30s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
112. Another "plus-size" model
made headlines recently--Crystal Renn, whose new book, "Hungry" is about her own journey through becoming a model at 14, becoming anorexic, and her battle back to normality. This woman is absolutely gorgeous, and I think it pretty much sucks to see the contortions both these women have gone through to become, and stay, models.

http://www.stylelist.com/blog/2009/08/24/exclusive-plus-size-model-crystal-renn-talks-to-stylelist-about/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #112
115. Wow, she's stunning (size 16)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocky Sullivan Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #115
123. Whoa! Don't hurt nobody, big girl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
114. I can see her as "plus size" but I also see the
disproportional aspect. Small from the waist up and BIG from the waist down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
116. When obesity is "normal", what should our artistic ideals reflect?
Should sculptures of Venus from hundreds of years ago be considered "unhealthy"?

Is Micheangleo's David "too thin"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
122. I bet she's really hot in clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC