Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Ashcroft Can Be Sued For Post-9/11 Detentions, Court Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 08:47 PM
Original message
John Ashcroft Can Be Sued For Post-9/11 Detentions, Court Rules
“BOISE, Idaho — A federal appeals court delivered a stinging rebuke Friday to the Bush administration's post-Sept. 11 detention policies, ruling that former Attorney General John Ashcroft can be held liable for people who were wrongfully detained as material witnesses after 9/11.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the government's improper use of material witnesses after Sept. 11 was "repugnant to the Constitution and a painful reminder of some of the most ignominious chapters of our national history."

The court found that a man who was detained as a witness in a federal terrorism case can sue Ashcroft for allegedly violating his constitutional rights. Abdullah al-Kidd, a U.S. citizen and former University of Idaho student, filed the lawsuit against Ashcroft and other officials in 2005, claiming his civil rights were violated when he was detained as a material witness for two weeks in 2003.

He said the investigation and detention not only caused him to lose a scholarship to study in Saudi Arabia, but cost him employment opportunities and caused his marriage to fall apart.

He argued that his detention exemplified an illegal government policy created by Ashcroft to arrest and detain people – particularly Muslim men and those of Arab decent – as material witnesses if the government suspected them of a crime but had no evidence to charge them.” Cont…

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/04/john-ashcroft-can-be-sued_n_277958.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R sink this sank like a rock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Different Stokes I Guess
This news made me :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think the various members of the previous mis-administration should be worried about now
Many of their actions will be coming back to bite them in the ass real soon, I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. The Al Capone Karma Ghost
If you can't get justice one way, try another. This will bite Mr. Let The Eagle Soar in his tail feather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, it doesn't really matter how they get caught, I just want them locked up
Actually I would prefer that they get charged and convicted of the mockery they made of the Constitution and of their abuse of Executive power but if we can't get anyone to do that, lock them up any way we can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow, this is right in my neck of the woods.
I remember that case well.

Here's an ACLU press release from 2006 that shows an Idaho judge ruling that the government can't use material witness statute to detain people as suspects:

http://www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/26935prs20060928.html

This would seem to be a natural culmination of that decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. A Jidge In Idaho No Less!
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. That Should Read Judge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. No Worries! Our right leaning SCOTUS will over-turn it - Everything for the powerful and elite.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC