20 years ago I would have settled for less. Today, after spending the majority of the last 3 decades uninsured I refuse to accept anything that leaves 17 million fellow citizens behind to suffer and/or die, foists the hardship of mandated payment on the backs of the working classes especially during a depression and allows for a massive transfer of wealth in the form of taxpayer subsidies to the wealthiest individuals and corporations that exist on the planet.
Funny how globalization is all the rage as long as business profits but looking globally for the best working health care systems to cover all americans and those same business elites go all out protectionist.
I'm sure the medical industry already has it best lobbyists lined up for those prime gov. regulatory positions. When the government proves it can effectively regulate the criminal financial industry maybe they can be relied on to regulate the medical industry. Until then the mandate will be the extent of reform. Just like the insurance industry stated back in June.
..."Insurers do not embrace all of the healthcare restructuring proposals. But they are fighting hard for a purchase requirement, sweetened with taxpayer-funded subsidies for customers who can't afford to buy it on their own, and enforced with fines."
..."The industry fears that the government would force lower fees on hospitals and physicians, enabling a public health insurance plan to offer consumers a better bargain.
That, they say, would make it hard for private companies to compete for customers. Insurers also fear that a public option could easily be converted later into a single-payer healthcare system.
Health insurers don't see a public plan "as the nose of the camel under the tent; they see it as the front half of the camel under the tent," said Robert Laszewski, a former insurance company executive and industry consultant.
"They are interested in 45 million new customers," he said, "but the first thing in everybody's mind is preserving their right to do business in a way that can be profitable and meet shareholder needs."
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jun/07/business/fi-healthcare7?pg=2