http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/britain-and-us-frustrate-global-deal-on-bonus-cap-1782096.htmlReuters version:
... But behind the scenes, some G20 sources expressed frustration that there was not more progress made in curbing excessive pay packages for bankers—particularly those employed by firms that have received billions of dollars in government support.
“There is broad agreement on what to do. The problem is we need to go beyond agreement. We need to have concrete measures,” said International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn. “I’m impressed by the level of consensus but I’m still waiting for strong measures to be decided and also to be implemented at the national level.”
Much of the public pressure before the meeting had centred on excessive bank remuneration.
“It is offensive to the public whose taxpayers’ money in different ways has helped (keep) many banks from collapsing and is now underpinning their recovery,” British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said at the start of Saturday’s meetings...
/...
http://www.france24.com/en/20090905-ministers-vow-tackle-bank-pay-but-fail-agree-bonus-limits-g20-finance-cap-stimulusThe Telegraph, on the other hand:
G20 will curb bank bonuses
Bonuses for bankers throughout the Western world will for the first time be subject to limits and checks as soon as next year after the G20 pledged to embark on an international crackdown on financiers' pay.
By Edmund Conway
Published: 8:19PM BST 05 Sep 2009
Banks will have caps imposed on the size of the bonus pot they can award to their staff under new rules set out yesterday by finance ministers from the grouping of the world's leading economies. Those banks that do not comply with the new international rules will be subject to sanctions and possible fines.
However, the summit threw out French and German proposals that each banker's bonus pot should be limited, in a decision which will be welcomed by City banks.
/...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/g20-summit/6143695/G20-will-curb-bank-bonuses.htmlAnd the FT:
After two days of meetings in London, the Group of 20 finance ministers and central bankers agreed the broad outlines of a tough new regulatory framework for financial institutions that stops short of setting caps on bankers’ bonuses but leaves open the possibility that regulators will have a say on pay.
...
Members appear to have passed some of the thorniest issues surrounding reform of bank regulation and the matter of payouts to bankers into the arms of the Financial Stability Board, an international group of central bankers and regulators.
The group stopped short of setting caps on bankers’ bonuses as some nations – France particularly – had pressed it to do. Instead, it has asked the FSB to help it draw up guidelines that incorporated the principles of transparency and improved corporate governance of banks including greater independence of remuneration committees.
It also agreed that compensation packages must have an element in which rewards are deferred for some time, clawback of payments is possible in cases where early profits lead to later losses and there are limits on guaranteed bonuses.
Mr Darling said that banking regulators may have a role in limiting bonuses. “We agreed to look at the total amount set aside for the bonus pool,” he said. “A regulator could look at that in light of the strength of the institution,” he added, implying that banks with highly risky strategies or those facing large losses could be forced to scale back total bonus payments.
The most important thing, Mr Darling said, was that any agreement on bonus structure must be embraced by all member states. “Quite clearly, you don’t want to get into a a situation where banks can play one country against another,” he said, adding that banks that do not adhere to the rules “will face sanctions.”
“You have to balance the bonus payment against the health of the firm,” he said. He added that there was unanimity among finance ministers and central bankers that “every single banker has to realise that they would not be here except for actions that were underwritten by taxpayers.”
/...
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6a7de19c-9a06-11de-9c09-00144feabdc0.html