Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Back to Business -- Wall Street Pursues Profit in Bundles of Life Insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:45 PM
Original message
Back to Business -- Wall Street Pursues Profit in Bundles of Life Insurance
Source: NYTimes

After the mortgage business imploded last year, Wall Street investment banks began searching for another big idea to make money. They think they may have found one.

The bankers plan to buy “life settlements,” life insurance policies that ill and elderly people sell for cash — $400,000 for a $1 million policy, say, depending on the life expectancy of the insured person. Then they plan to “securitize” these policies, in Wall Street jargon, by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die.

The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return — though if people live longer than expected, investors could get poor returns or even lose money.

Either way, Wall Street would profit by pocketing sizable fees for creating the bonds, reselling them and subsequently trading them. But some who have studied life settlements warn that insurers might have to raise premiums in the short term if they end up having to pay out more death claims than they had anticipated.

The idea is still in the planning stages. But already “our phones have been ringing off the hook with inquiries,” says Kathleen Tillwitz, a senior vice president at DBRS, which gives risk ratings to investments and is reviewing nine proposals for life-insurance securitizations from private investors and financial firms, including Credit Suisse.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/business/06insurance.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&src=igw



This is sure to end well. . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fuckers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. A salient old DU thread: I Know! Let’s Rape Grandma!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's a sure fire way to kill the insurance industry
Insurance companies are not setup to pay 100% of all policies written. A large portion expire, so that allows them to keep the pools working. If they have to pay off each and every policy, price will need to be near 100% of payout else it's not worth the risk of underwriting.

Can we have them securitize health insurance? I want single payer, this would make it happen quick. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. You're right about that
It has occurred to me several times that many folks are cheaper to the insurance industry dead than alive, and that the only way to make sure they approve your care is to have a whopping big life insurance policy with your health insurer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. and I didn't think they had any more Stupid left in 'em...

they continue to prove me wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I see Death Panels
no, really...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. That was my reaction as well.
'Death Panels' realized!! Calling sarah palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobshin Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. So this is why corporate is fighting health care reform.
Longer lives mean smaller payouts. But not to worry, when it all goes bad, when the insurance companies run out of money from paying out almost all policies, the capitalist, er, socialist government of America will bail them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It seems almost too evil to be true, but
look at this passage from the article:

"The solution? A bond made up of life settlements would ideally have policies from people with a range of diseases — leukemia, lung cancer, heart disease, breast cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s. That is because if too many people with leukemia are in the securitization portfolio, and a cure is developed, the value of the bond would plummet."

So, basically, these bonds will create multi-billion dollar incentives to not find cures for leukemia and similar diseases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Not only that, you want to sell policies to people with no coverage.
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 10:44 PM by bemildred
What a great deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Also provides an incentive for bondholders to block funding of health care for these people.
Every extra day that this population survives, the value of the bond declines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. They are short-selling humanity. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. "create multi-billion dollar incentives to not find cures"...
Although that is, of course, already the case...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. And no doubt the Corps. that hold these deat derivitives
are also huge investors in the death insurers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scentopine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Its what they will do with our health insurance if we let them
For some time I have had a sick feeling that bundling health insurance policies up and trading them as derivatives is the next frontier for health "reform" as well.

We are turning into a nation of cockroaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is nothing new. When AIDS was widespread and medication wasn't as effective
there were companies that would buy life insurance of those with HIV.

I'll get banned if I post what I want to say about these type of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Another meltdown coming - once a private-sector plan is passed, they'll crash this market.
This is the subprime crisis and the mortgage Credit Default Swaps all over again. Once a private-centered plan is passed, they'll crash the industry, and expect another bailout. Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark D. Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Alert Progressives
Dennis Kucinich, Ralph Nader, others like them need to learn of this and protest. It is self-explanatory. The sooner the old folks insured pass on, the more profit. I am not kidding when I say we should fear for their lives. As the past has proven, financial elite are good at hiring hit-men. Where are the reforms we are supposed to see that have real teeth from Obama on this kind of 'buy ridiculous shit for short profit no matter what it messes up'. Only now its not forclosures that are the potential end-game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. Die! Die! Everybody die!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesbassman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah, because Wall Street handled the mortgage industry so well.
Has it not become clear to even the thickest freeper that Wall Street cannot be trusted with anything that directly involves the consumer? So what are the pols doing right now? Are they sitting around saying "Well, the Insurance Industry and Wall Street surely know what they're doing, let's just let the market handle this". Are they that stupid, or are we for letting them get away with not doing their jobs?

Jeez, this is a disaster in the making, and it's going to end up costing the American taxpayer trillions to bail out Hartford, Fireman's Fund, and AIG (again!).

You know, come to think of it, I smell a big Goldman Sachs rat here. I would bet hard cash that if you dig deep enough, the sleaze balls at GS are up to their Armani collared necks in this swindle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
19. Aw, they just want a bailout like Wall Street.
Edited on Sun Sep-06-09 01:24 AM by lurky
The bankers have been having all the fun, making insane investments and getting Washington to fork over huge piles of cash, no strings attached.

Can you blame the insurance guys for wanting a piece of the action? I can almost hear them calling: "Hey! We're too big to fail, too! Look, we'll prove it!"

Edited to add: Just in time for swine flu, too! I wonder how that will affect the elderly and seriously ill people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
22. Way to go, Wall Street! Another way to steal money! Way to go!
We need to revive the 99% tax bracket for these racketeers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. Revolution! They are just asking for it, IMHO.
Send them all off to re-education camps, "Great Leap Forward"-style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
26. Even in a "free market economy" we don't allow people to sell their own organs
why would we make it legal to buy and sell their lives? Because basically, that's what this amounts to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC