Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean: I’m going to continue to be supportive of the president on Afghanistan.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 05:32 PM
Original message
Dean: I’m going to continue to be supportive of the president on Afghanistan.
DEAN: I’m not so sure I’m the liberal wing, but I guess I’m the -- I’m appointed by you the head of the liberal wing or whatever. No, I -- look, I’ve supported the president on this one. I think this is different than Iraq. I think there are people who mean the United States harm over there.

I think -- I was very pleased to say the -- hear the president a few months ago say, “Look, we can’t win this war militarily.” He gets what we have to do here. And it is true that American public opinion is not supportive of the war effort anymore.

I think this does have something to do with security to the United States. I do believe it has something to do with the role of women in these kinds of societies. I think we ought to be supportive of the role of women and their ability to get an education and things like that. I don’t think that’s the only reason we’re there.

But I’m supportive of the president, and I’m going to continue to be supportive of the president on Afghanistan.

link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. the illegal occupation of Afghanistan is just as lame now as it was under Bush
And I'll support none of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Then the good Dr Dean can stand without me on this one.
Out Now!

No Military Objective + No Exit Strategy = Quagmire

How will we know if we win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creena Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I stand with Dr. Dean on health care.
But, not on Afghanistan. I don't understand how anyone can support the occupation. How can one support an indefinite war? Where's the end? What's the goal? When is enough, enough?

I wish his view differed on this one. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree with him - on both issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm with Dean on this one ~ if we only knew
what Dean and Obama know about the trash left by Bush, we would probably agree with them.

We are not walking in their shoes so IMO we are the sit down quarterbacks that can sit back and relax and complain.


I'll trust them to do the thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dean is allowed to have his own opinions.
I was torn over being there but I think its time to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. As the President has said there are no good choices in Afghanistan

Dr. Dean's response is intelligent and reality based.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Let them fight their own battles
I'm sick of seeing ten to fifteen body bags a week coming home from those places. We're going from babysitting them to adopting them. Neither one needs to be done.

Is it going to suck to be a woman in Afghanistan? When didn't it? And do we really think we're going to change that without shooting a majority of the men there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. From 1959-1989 Women in Afghanistan lived under one of the most liberal regimes
in the Islamic world.




In 1959, the male-oriented government of Prime Minister Daud Khan supported the voluntary removal of the veil and the end of seclusion for women. The 1964 Constitution automatically enfranchised women and guaranteed them the right to education and freedom to work.<1>

For thirty years after 1959 growing numbers of women, most from urban backgrounds, functioned in the public arena with poise and dignity, with no loss of honor to themselves or to their families, and with much credit to the nation. Nevertheless, family pressures, traditional attitudes and religious opposition continued to impose constraints which limited the degree to which women could find self-expression and control their lives.<1>


and this

Following the end of the Second World War, Zahir Shah recognised the need for the modernisation of Afghanistan and recruited a number of foreign advisers to assist with the process.<11> During this period Afghanistan's first modern university was founded.<11> During his reign a number of potential advances and reforms were derailed as a result of factionalism and political infighting.<12>

Zahir Shah was able to govern on his own in 1963<8> and despite the factionalism and political infighting a new constitution was introduced in 1964 which turned Afghanistan into a modern democratic state by introducing free elections, a parliament, civil rights, liberation for women and universal suffrage.<[br />


Afghanistan's strong move to liberation for women and universal suffrage was a direct result of the Soviet Union's invasion and the rise of the Taliban (with the help of the US) to combat the Soviet invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think it depends on the part of the country you lived in
Life was much better for women in Kabul or the other major cities. But in many of the tribal areas I think it was a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That is always true
however the tribal areas did not become hyper reactionary until the reaction to the communist invasion.


Pakistan also has had universal sufferage and women politicians.


Most people don't realize that the areas that are currently fundamentalist were largely secular with traditional superstitions and religious practices a few years ago.

In the story of India on PBS they documented how most of the people that lived in rural areas didn't even identify themselves with a particular religion until British census forced themselves to sign up to a particular group.

Up until that time people of Islamic descent would go with their friends to Hindu temples and Hindus would go with their friends to the local Mosque.

Hyper religious identification only arouse in rural areas fairly recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm with Feingold on this one
I support the President but we need a clearly defined mission and exit strategy. It makes no sense to stay there for another decade and to try and to conquer the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Even Howard Dean isn't perfect.
I'm with the good doctor 99% of the time, but I gotta part company with him on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. too bad. thumbs down for Dean from me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. there are many nations who 'mean us harm' should we occupy all of them dr. dean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC