Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Romantic' Darjeeling bans public displays of affection

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 08:34 AM
Original message
'Romantic' Darjeeling bans public displays of affection
India-

According to campaigners, a de-facto ban has been imposed by the security wing of the ruling Gorkha Janmukti Morcha party, which has been patrolling the promenades of the genteel hill station as a "morality police force".

....

"In our customs, we are an open society and holding hands is no problem, but kissing in public we do not entertain at all. When it happened, the elders said it was very embarrassing. Our boys had gone politely to ask them to stop. It's not done. But suddenly this boy, the husband, got very angry and retaliated. He was very rude and reacted violently," he said.

The incidents came amid growing concern about the role of the force, which has been patrolling highways and reprimanding teenagers smoking in public or loitering on the main square.

"They think it is spoiling the youth, that it's a bad example. Everyone is concerned about it. Darjeeling is synonymous with love and affection, and if this goes on we'll miss out in the long run," said Deep Gazmer, vice-president of the Darjeeling Press Guild.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/6146863/Romantic-Darjeeling-bans-public-displays-of-affection.html

See this is what we need in the US. Kissing in public may harm or offend someone, somewhere, so we should ban it. Maybe not on your own lawn, but once you are on public property we should be able to force you to act in a way the nannies approve of (Not to mention we need to ban any food that may be bad for you since what is bad for you is bad for us all).

We don't need religious fanatics here to run our lives like they do there we just tell those who worship money that what you do affects the money of others (ala, your choices cost me money on my health care premiums, etc) and then control that.

Everyone has a god they worship, for some it is green one that they keep in their pocket or purse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck the morality police.
Edited on Mon Sep-07-09 08:47 AM by Edweird
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. you mean, fuck them in public? shouldn't that be banned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC