Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mr President YOU NEED TO LEAD: Former Obama Staffers Are Standing Up for a Robust Public Option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:04 AM
Original message
Mr President YOU NEED TO LEAD: Former Obama Staffers Are Standing Up for a Robust Public Option
Edited on Mon Sep-07-09 10:09 AM by kpete
Former Obama Staffers Are Standing Up for a Robust Public Option
by HRCDemographic4Obama
Mon Sep 07, 2009 at 07:03:59 AM PDT

I and my fellow Obama for America staffers are coming together to demand that the change we worked seven days a week, 16-18 hour days for, is the same change President Obama told us we can believe in.

....................

...The President told us:

"I promise you if everybody in this hall is willing to keep doing what you guys did over the last two years, then I am optimistic about America. I may make some mistakes, but you'll set me right."

.....................

I close this diary with a letter to the President.

Dear Mr. President:

Your former staffers did not expect you will get everything out of Congress, but we do expect for you to put up the good fight. The same good fight staffers, volunteers, and donors put up to get you elected. There were some tiring days, days we wanted to quit, and take the easy route. But we didn't. We stood up for what we knew this country needed. A new direction.

Mr. President this is your first domestic test. You never accepted half-ass from us as staffers and we cannot accept half-ass from you as President. It is important that you fight for your very own vision just as we are fired up and ready to do. The public option has to be robust and tied to medicare rates.

Mr. President, your former staffers did not fight hard to put you in office so that one lone republican ends up writing the health care bill. Health care has already been triggered. You have said yourself, the current course is unsustainable and that medicare will be in the red in a decade if nothing is done. Sounds to me like every trigger has been met.

Mr. President we need you to lead.

Sincerely,

Your Former Campaign Staffers.


more:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/9/7/778148/-UPDATED:-Former-Obama-Staffers-Are-Standing-Up-for-a-Robust-Public-Option
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Huge K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Buck the bucking republicans nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeffbr Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. The word "bipartisan" should be banned from the White House
simple as that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Carlin's take on that...
"Bipartisan usually means that a larger-than-usual deception is being carried out."

- George Carlin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. the lesson of Gore 2000 seems to have been lost on democrats
you don't pander to the Liebermans of this nation and win elections. if you ignore the base once you're in office, you will have a one-term administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah! I think he should do something highly unusual and call a combined session of Congress
...and give a speech pushing his agenda.

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cilla4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Fighter and the Conciliator
I am reminded of the very cogent distinction made between HRC and BO during the campaign for the Dem nomination. She was the fighter; he was the conciliator. I think she articulated this distinction, most explicitly. Now I am wondering why conciliator sounded so good at the time? In order to appeal to independents, I suppose. E.g., to get more votes.

Now we need a fighter. Politics need to be put aside (although I could argue taking a firm stand on health care, banking, etc., is the wise political move) and the right thing done.

Like many others here, I find myself terribly disappointed right now. I will reserve judgement until Wednesday p.m. I am prepared to lay down my activism that night however, and turn my focus either inward, or to areas when I can make a difference, since the writing is on the wall in terms of who our country and our government stand for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You're forgetting that HRC was sharply to the right of Obama on all issues
Edited on Mon Sep-07-09 08:45 PM by Ken Burch
And was running as a white resentment candidate, which would have meant she'd have had no right to ask the Rainbow to vote for her in the fall. Also, it goes without saying that she wouldn't have had a real victory(that is, she wouldn't have taken over 50%).

HRC disqualified herself as a Democrat with her George Wallace-style West Virginia campaign.

Besides, she was the one who lost the healthcare fight LAST time, which means she'd be certain to lose it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Also with HRC in the general election...
...McCain wouldn't have picked Palin as his VP which was his most crippling move. Facing Hillary, he very well would have chosen someone far less offensive to many fence straddlers.

I just don't think HRC would have won. It was either going to be Obama or McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Bush needed opposing on some major issues for 8yrs. Which fights did Hillary lead opposition?
Maybe you can explain why you THINK she is a fighter....maybe because media and Clinton campaign SEZ SO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cilla4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Calling it out
I think this is part of Obama's reticence to be seen as an "angry black man." HRC does not seem unwilling to "let down her hair" from time to time and speak with a stridency that brings her much criticism and disdain.

I hope Obama will get mad tomorrow night. This situation calls for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. mad for what? "any" bill just to claim a victory? I think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. She has only done it FOR SHOW for her campaigns - NEVER to oppose Bush or fight FOR a Dem issue
Edited on Tue Sep-08-09 11:22 AM by blm
If you actually THINK about her senate career and how she acted WHEN she had the duty to do so, you would realize that you repeat a crafted meme that she is a 'fighter' no differently than Republicans' repeat the meme that Bush was a straight talker.

When Clintons were supposed to 'fight' for healthcare bill, they both rolled over without a fight and never brought it up again, not even for Bill's re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I am soooooo glad
that Mr. Obama will not roll over like that! He will show us on Wednesday when he comes out for the public option that 90% want! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. The exchange is about the 'HRC is a fighter' meme used by posters claiming SHE would fight
Edited on Tue Sep-08-09 11:39 AM by blm
like hell for public option where Obama won't.

There is NOTHING in her senate career that supports that claim, and, in fact, her record supports the exact opposite view, that she was OVERLY conciliatory towards Bush's agenda, especially on the major issues of his terms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Those are staffers I can believe in!
:applause:

Unfortunately, he doesn't seem willing to listen.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib_wit_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeeDeeNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. Thank you, Staffers! You express exactly the sentiments of many of us who worked in the
"trenches".

Recommend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. Staffers apparently learning a crucial lesson re our phony democracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
20. This was Bill Moyers message also. Spot on!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC