elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-07-09 04:24 PM
Original message |
Want HC Rallies Covered in the MSM? Hold Future HC RALLIES at the MSM's Studio Buildings. |
|
The MSM can't ignore their own front door.
CNN can't let MSNBC cover a rally at CNN while they ignore it, and vice-versa.
Then we can also 'splain why we're rallying AT the TVNews studio bldgs. and big newspapers -- b/c they're ignoring what 80% of America WANTS.
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-07-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-07-09 04:26 PM by FrenchieCat
Too bad I don't have free "miles".....or else, my ass would be there.
What about folks simply going to their local Television stations or newspaper headquarters, especially in cities and towns where there are no CNN/FOx/NBC/CBS/ABC Corporate offices? That might work too! :)
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-07-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Heh. I like the notion, but it seems to me that there's nothing they would ignore MORE. |
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-07-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Be sure to have some professional "criers" there, and a few finger |
|
biters for entertainment. Just teasing.
|
lunatica
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-07-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Is this reverse psychological business competition? |
|
Ignore your own crowd outside your building but overdo the coverage on the crowds outside the buildings of the competition and in the meantime we, the audience will get some news? Not a bad idea at all. They could compete for their rivals to look bad instead of competing for our attention. I like that. It's rather an old tried and true capitalistic practice when there's real competition among businesses.
LOL!
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-07-09 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message |