Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: Baucus introducing new plan in effort to undermine public option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:13 PM
Original message
Breaking: Baucus introducing new plan in effort to undermine public option
It seems as if "Pain in the end Baucus" is going to attempt to introduce an entirely very complicated plan that would leave private insurance companies in control of the market but add a token fee that would be used to help subsidize lower income purchasers.

It tries to revive medical cooperatives as the faux competitor to keep costs down.

The most pathetic part of the continuing antics of the "Bozo known as Baucus" is that he is doing all of these gymnastics to negotiate with one or two Republican Senators who, we all know, are not going to vote for the bill anyway.

Pathetic, simply pathetic. This guy should be moved to be Chairman of the Committee to Oversee Federal Latrines.



http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_HEALTH_CARE_OVERHAUL?SITE=VAROA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Sen. Max Baucus on Monday pushed a new health care plan including an industry fee to help pay for covering the uninsured as President Barack Obama said insurance companies must share accountability for the troubled system. . . . It's unclear whether the fee, designed to create competition in the insurance market, would win support of two key Republicans in the group: Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Mike Enzi of Wyoming. The Baucus proposal reflected many of their priorities, chief among them the decision not to include a government-run plan to compete with private insurers.

. . .

Democratic sources close to the negotiations, who were not authorized to be quoted by name, disclosed the fee and other details of the Baucus proposal. One source said the proposal included suggestions from all six members.

The fee is only a piece of a Baucus plan that would establish a new way to purchase coverage for Americans who have trouble getting and keeping health insurance. Americans could keep their own doctors.

. . .

Under the Baucus, plan health insurance exchanges, with information on different plans and prices, would allow small groups and individuals to buy policies at lower rates. Medicaid would be expanded to cover more low-income people. Nonprofit cooperatives would be established as an alternative to for-profit insurance companies, giving consumers more choices. Tax credits would allow low-and-middle income Americans to buy private coverage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Baucus is fuckus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. He doing what his employers paid him to do.
What a bribed politician this sack of shit is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Breaking news: Water is wet
Nothin' new.

:snore:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bzzzzt! Time's up Max - too late! We've already written you off, buh-bye. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yep
Add a fee on the insurance companies, and then watch them raise premiums on everyone! Great for insurance companies, not so good for those who will be paying more to make up for he fee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. premiums need to capped on plans they are allowed to offer at the "exchange"
no more "windfall" profits for them

wonder why no one is talking about it. cheap way to real reform:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6488988
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. And the punchline isn't all that funny
Even after bending over for his insurance company overlords and their Republican stooges, "It's unclear whether the fee . . . would win support of . . . Grassley and Enzi." So Baucus is willing to abase himself entirely, hand the keys to his office over to thugs and thieves, and they still won't vote for his crappy bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Baucus is marginalizing himself.
He is rapidly becoming irrelevant and Rahm realizes he can't hold the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think that is his plan...

His plan is to pass SOMETHING in the Senate... knowing that the Public Option will be in the House version that passes.


Then the two bills have to be merged... and the Public Option will be in the final bill that both houses must vote on.


At that point, via reconciliation (hopefully), we get 50 votes in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Small groups and individuals buy at lower prices...You have to
have groups large enough that you can negotiate with the
Insurance Company. Your leverage is the huge pool of buyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. Time to follow-through on the threat from Reid and remove him from the chairmanship...
...oh wait, neveer mind, that would require Reid to grow his balls back first... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. Baucus' efforts don't matter in the end.
Edited on Tue Sep-08-09 11:46 AM by Proud Liberal Dem
The Senate bill will undoubtably SUCK balls but IMHO it's what happens in Conference that will be key to what ultimately happens. The important thing to remember at the moment is that we need to get a bill out of the SFC so that it can get to conference. My guess is that such legislation will NOT be acceptable to House Dems and some MAJOR changes will inevitably be made before it leaves conference, so just let Baucus do what he's going to do and let's move forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Also we should note that simply because he gets it out of his committee
doesn't mean that the Senate will pass it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Exactly- and probably won't
Edited on Tue Sep-08-09 01:54 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
I'm expecting the more Kennedy-esque bill to pass in the Senate, probably with a PO "trigger". Once it gets to Conference, all bets are off but the House Democrats, among which there are more progressives, will help formulate something better IMHO. Maybe not the stars, the moon, and the galaxy but it will at least be something I think Obama can sign and we can take some pride in. And then we can come back next year, the year after next, etc. and work on it some more. If Obama gets to sign anything it will, if anything, create the momentum for further change, which is exactly why the Pubs are working so desperately to defeat even the most conciliatory ideas. Obama (and everybody whom supports reform) will prevail in the end IMHO. The Pubs can only keep our society from evolving for so long and the conditions have never been favorable for another step up the evolutionary ladder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. It appears some house dems are backing down a bit though.
I'm very very worried and nervous about Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. That's true (per the latest media reports)
However, I honestly don't believe that Baucus' plan- or any iteration thereof- will survive to make it to the President's desk. I'm expecting more of the Kennedy committee's bill (hopefully with a PO) to prevail in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. Can we PLEASE make him one of the top 10 Conservative Idiots this week?!!
I know that Dems aren't put on that list, but I think Baucus is setting so many precedents of DINOism that he deserves to be made a precedent in this case too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. You remember Bigus Dickus from the Life of Brian? How bout Baucus Caucus!
Or if you want to get to the point, you could spell "Caucus" a little more aggressively than I did!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. people should protest the man where he lives
Edited on Tue Sep-08-09 11:59 AM by fascisthunter
and keep doing so until his head explodes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. It is simple - no public option, no national health care coverage.
Aww, poor health insurers. Fucking demons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Take away his chairmanship. He is overtly working AGAINST the values of the Party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. Today's email to the White House
Have been reading an article about the bones of the Senate Finance committee's proposal. As I see it there might be some protection in the form of subsidies for people below 300% of the poverty level. In essence they would be limited to paying 13% of their income for premiums. So, as I read that, there is nothing to keep the rest of the working class from having to pay 25% (as we were) or even more for their premiums. Is this true?
I am tired of the argument about the perfect being the enemy of the good. This is about the barely acceptable being the enemy of the disastrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. Why should we gut health care reform to win over a couple of backstabbing, disingenuous twits.
Nay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thatsrightimirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. zzzzzzzzz
Even Ben Nelson has now acknowledged that a public option is the best way to run down costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
27. WTF is Reid? Doesn't Reid have the power to yank Baucus off as chair and off of the committee
itself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. The Baucus Plan is NO compromise....It pure, unadulterated EVIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC