While much of the focus of South Carolina, P.M. (Post Maria) has centered around whether or not Gov. Mark Sanford broke the law with his various travel arrangements, the governor’s growing chorus of critics have recently returned to an argument that held considerable sway early on in the scandal.
It boils down to four words: “willful neglect of duty.”
Basically, this argument holds that when Sanford disappeared for a week earlier this summer to visit with his Argentine lover, Maria Belen Chapur (and lied about his whereabouts to his family, staff and state), he technically violated the South Carolina Constitution, which lists “willful neglect of duty” as an impeachable offense.
<snip>
Either way, in an apparent effort to preemptively counter the “willful neglect of duty” accusation, Sanford is now telling his confidants that his “secret” trip to Argentina wasn’t really such a secret after all.
Specifically, Sanford is now privately telling some of his closest allies that he actually informed several “state leaders” of his ill-fated June 2009 jaunt to Buenos Aires, Argentina – as well as his distinctly personal reasons for making the trip.
<snip>
We already know that the governor’s wife, Chief of Staff, then-spokesman and top law enforcement officer (who is responsible for providing his security) were unaware of Sanford’s location.
Who then, exactly, did he tell? That’s the best part of this story … Sanford’s not telling.
According to one of the sources we spoke with about this latest development, the governor is “holding off on disclosing the names because those people also knew why he was there.”
http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/09/07/sanford-not-incommunicado/Trying to follow this idiot's reasoning will give you brainlock. He's pulled so much stuff out of his butt that he's given himself a high colonic.