Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 11:40 AM
Original message |
Did Clyburn just say no public option to start, but "might" be added later? |
|
I was not paying attention. he is now on MSNBC talking about it. 12.40 PM EDT.
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Ahh the carrot and the stick trick |
|
That's cause they think we are stoopid.
|
Autumn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
2. You can bet your ass if that's the |
|
case, there won't be a public option. No way it will happen "later".
|
Are_grits_groceries
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. That's what I was asking |
|
I'm not sure what I heard. But with no cheerleaders Cha Cha-ing in here, it is probably what he said.
|
Raineyb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
5. You mean like how Medicare was to start for senior citizens then expanded to the rest of the |
|
populace? Yeah, that sounds like a winner. :sarcasm:
|
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message |
6. He was saying he thinks something should get passed that can, down the road, be built into a robust |
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
I mean, it is difficult to pass when you have the Senate, House AND the POTUS. We should certainly wait until we can get rid of at least one of those disadvantages...:sarcasm:
|
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Right? Probably a better bet to wait until we're out of power to implement a robust plan. nt. |
Are_grits_groceries
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Well that sure explains a lot. |
|
I'll guess we'll get 2 aspirin and call them in 2 years for a start.:sarcasm:
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. That's what I thought I was hearing, too. |
|
Incredible.
I see the cheerleaders have been at work on this thread. Damned if we can discuss this without pissing them off.
|
Critters2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
10. That's how the "trigger" works. Added later, if the insurance companies don't |
|
make some specific changes. No way Congress will hold the industry to any standards.
|
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
11. So how is that any significant reform at all? |
|
Just call it the "health care status quo" Bill
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-08-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Well if there is no Medicare-like public option in the end, why has |
|
Congress wasted all these months shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic? I mean we are going to end up with what we already have, which is nothing. Oh, yes they will cut spending in Medicare and Medicaid so they can continue the wars.
I'm dumbfounded. I can't believe we have such a corrupt government. We, who were once the greatest democracy in the world.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |