Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fines proposed for going without health insurance.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillieW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:34 PM
Original message
Fines proposed for going without health insurance.
Edited on Tue Sep-08-09 06:36 PM by WillieW
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090908/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_health_care_overhaul


WASHINGTON – Americans would be fined up to $3,800 for failing to buy health insurance under a plan that circulated in Congress on Tuesday as divisions among Democrats undercut President Barack Obama's effort to regain traction on his health care overhaul.

As Obama talked strategy with Democratic leaders at the White House, the one idea that most appeals to his party's liberal base lost ground in Congress. Prospects for a government-run plan to compete with private insurers sank as a leading moderate Democrat said he could no longer support the idea.

The fast-moving developments put Obama in a box. As a candidate, he opposed fines to force individuals to buy health insurance, and he supported setting up a public insurance plan. On Tuesday, fellow Democrats publicly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's the way it is in Massachusetts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Yup
Bummer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. How did we get from single payer to fines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. The WH has provided little leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
create.peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. well, that would just about wipe me out!nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Even if my fine ended up being a fraction of that number it would still kill me.
How fucking stupid do you have to be to propose fining people for not being able to FUCKING AFFORD something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. this is a gift to the health insurance corporations....
It is a disgrace that any Democrat and especially President Obama would even contemplate this fucking rip off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. what a ripoff
appalling that this is being touted as "reform."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't like that idea AT ALL!
Most people really want health insurance. If it is affordable - and perhaps subsidized - few people would opt out.

Nobody should be forced to buy it. That just takes away one more freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
48. Several of us pay for those not having it right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Yeah that is true, but I really think most people will want it as long as it is affordable - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Put it on my tax bill then
If we have to pay, then it's a tax. If it's a tax, put it on my income taxes and be done.

Let's have single payer, and a public option.

Why this chickenshit mandate? That's throwing more money at the insurance pigs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. IF this were to pass it would push people to protest in the streets ... guaranteed.
A public mandate to buy private insurance without a public option would do it.

I don't see it happening... rather I see it killing any chances at passing a healthcare reform bill.
We would be back at the Clinton days ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. you think *this* would finally get Americans off their asses and into the streets
after two stolen Presidential elections, the repealing of the Constitution, the inexorable killing of the biosphere, etc...?

I dunno...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. This was always a WIN/WIN for insurance companies ...
... either they get millions of Americans required to buy private insurance from them without a public option,

OR they kill healthcare reform entirely.

Game... set .... match.... UNLESS Dems step up and push through a bill with a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. that is pretty fucking stupid...
sounds more like something a puke would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. This can't possibly pass
It's insane.

If it passes I will give up on this country ever meaning anything again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gravel Democrat Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. And guess which Government Entity will enforce this mandate?
When you've guessed the correct answer you should ask why no one is talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. They gonna impose fines on employers who do not pay workers enough to AFFORD insurance?
No, didn't think so.

Time for a shit load of civil disobedience. How can underpaid workers who are in constant jeopardy of being homeless if they miss a couple days of work possibly afford one more MANDATE to support big business while big business stands on their throats?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. "shitload of civil disobedience" is right...
of course, it's been time for decades...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Please K & R this and get it on greatest page
This is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Baucus is an ass.... Good luck collecting money from the poor and homeless
They will not get a dime from me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. There wouldn't be homeless people if we forced them to buy houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. LOL!
perfect! :applause:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. That is very dumb and wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. No , NO, and NOOO - not without a public option.
If you make insurance mandatory without a public option you are requiring people to line the pockets of the insurance executives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Isn't that already a part of HR3200?
It's begins on page 167 of HR3200, referred to as ‘‘PART VIII—HEALTH CARE RELATED TAXES", PART 1—INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY, Sec. 401. Tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage.

It's a tax imposed on people without either private or public option coverage. Isn't this the same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yost69 Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Yes it is. 2.5%. But every time I mention it,
it is like I am a total ass for complaining about being forced to do something. Now that there is an actual number everyone wants to bitch about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Thanks, at least I know I'm not seeing things! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. Just beautiful.. How can unemployed pay $3,800
I heard that the IRS will enforce this....I guess we are all headed to debtors prison.

This just proves the total diconnect in CONgress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. So we either subsidize enormous CEO salaries/industry PROFITS, or
we get slapped with a fine. Either way we're likely to get denied health care.

How marvelous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gopiscrap Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. FUCK that
if you can't afford health insurance you can't afford the 3,800.00 fine..what do we want to do...send 47,000,000 to jail? That's most assinine thing I have heard yet...the insurance companies must be splooging all over themselves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
29. Too bad we can't fine politicians for not providing health care.
But, as usual, shit trickles downhill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Personally, I'd like to yank theirs out from under them
and deny them access to Bethesda or any other clinic, but that won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. That is not reform
Edited on Tue Sep-08-09 07:49 PM by ixion
it is a massive windfall for insurance companies, and the government.

There is no way in hell I would support this legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
31. If the crime of a mandate passes I have a question.
What are they going to do to Americans living abroad? They're required to pay income taxes, will they include them in the mandate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
35. That works out to be about 316.67 per month.
If someone doesn't have the dough to buy a cheapo junk insurance policy, then it stands to reason that this person wouldn't be able to afford the fine either.

Essentially it's punishing a person for being poor, but not poor enough to qualify for a subsidy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
36. They are mocking us. They are really daring us to storm the Bastille.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Maybe that's what it will take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
37. Incredible!
This is health care reform by Ebenezer Scrouge.

Next up -- you get fined if you are homeless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. Sure - fine me when I'm AGAIN TURNED DOWN for insurance
I foresee some SERIOUS class action lawsuits from the people who are insurance lepers. They think there is a stink NOW? Just frigging wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
40. And they expect my money, my time and chiefly my vote
That is a good fucking joke.

They are pushing too far and they will get a reaction

This country is on the edge of some ugliness and this will NOT help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
41. Who propsed this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
42. This seems to be unconstitutional...
I cannot find where this would be legal in the Constitution. There are no provisions for 'fines'.

Anybody agree or disagree with my statements?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. Yeah, let's force people to buy private insurance policies
because there's no public option..and let's give those who can't afford it subsidies (our tax dollars) to do it!! Now the insurance companies will not only get a huge chunk of my paycheck each month...they'll also get my tax dollars too! I can't believe something like this is even being contemplated by Democrats. Why didn't we just stay home on election day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
44. The mandate always came with a fine.
While everyone has been obsessing and freaking out over the rightwing nuts at the town halls for a month the insurance industry has been lobbying for larger more punitive fines. Voila.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
45. Why do I feel like I am being robbed?
We should all just bend over and make it easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
46. this is Baucus's big plan. and this:
"The Baucus plan would require insurers to take all applicants, regardless of age or health. But smokers could be charged higher premiums. And 60-year-olds could be charged five times as much for a policy as 20-year-olds."

So 60 year old smokers may as well just pay the fine or, if they can't pay it, go to jail? I mean wtf? What are they supposed to do?

Baucus may as well become a Repuke because he's got the moves down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Backass should be surrounded by protesters asap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
47. This is what it has always been since the beginning.
It's always simply been a plan to enrich the insurance companies more. The public option is only in the debate as a smokescreen to keep the left talking about something that has always been nothing but an empty red herring.

The public option, let alone single payer, has never, ever been a serious issue among those that will decide what the plan will be. The politicians that 'support' it only do so as a front to keep their left wing support from dwindling too much.

You will see once something passes.
It will be a boost to the insurance and medical corporations that will guarantee them more customers.

I expect Obama's speech tonight to essentially support this plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
50. Line item veto?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC