Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reinventing the old for sustainable agriculture (Healthy hay)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 05:06 PM
Original message
Reinventing the old for sustainable agriculture (Healthy hay)
cows that fart less.not by changing the cow, simply by giving them a more efficient grass to munch on. good news for free ranged grass fed milkers.
--###--

original-scenta

Reinventing the old for sustainable agriculture
Source: scenta

Ruminants, particularly dairy cows, are major contributors to environmental pollution, but by eating sainfoin, an almost forgotten traditional fodder legume, the animals' polluting emissions could be cut significantly.

Now the University of Reading's agriculture department, in collaboration with other EU and Armenian colleagues, is part of a new Marie Curie research training network called 'HealthyHay', which will investigate the benefits of feeding sainfoin to livestock.

Dr Irene Mueller-Harvey, project leader at Reading, said: "Ruminants utilise sainfoin protein very efficiently. They also make better use of the energy in sainfoin compared to grass of equal metabolisable energy content.

"This is important because more efficient nutrient utilisation of protein and energy leads to less environmental pollution in terms of nitrogen and methane emissions.
~snip~
.
.
.
complete story here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. only in our insane world is nitrogen a polutant
cow shit = FERTILIZER - organic, natural easily utilized by plants and soil organisms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Too much nitrogen leads to NOx being produced by bacteria.
If that manure were ALL mixed into crop soil, that would be fine. But much of it is not, and gives off small amounts of NOx which add to both acid rain and GHGs. (The amount is small, but N2O is a tremendously potenet GHG, IIRC.)

from Wikipedia:
Control of nitrous oxide is thus part of efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions, such as the Kyoto Protocol. Nitrous oxide is the third most important greenhouse gas in contribution to global warming, ranking behind carbon dioxide and methane. (The other nitrogen oxides contribute to global warming indirectly, by contributing to tropospheric ozone production during smog formation).

Nitrous oxide also attacks ozone in the stratosphere, aggravating the excess amount of UV light striking the earth's surface in recent decades, in a manner similar to various freons and related halogenated organics. Nitrous oxide is the main naturally-occurring regulator of stratospheric ozone.

Nitrous oxide is naturally emitted by bacteria in soils and oceans. Agriculture is the main source of human-produced nitrous oxide: cultivating soil, the use of nitrogen fertilizers, and animal waste handling can all stimulate naturally occurring bacteria to produce more nitrous oxide. The livestock sector (primarily cows, chickens, and pigs) produces 65% of human-related nitrous oxide <3>. Industrial sources make up only about 20% of all anthropogenic sources, and include the production of nylon and nitric acid and the burning of fossil fuel in internal combustion engines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. what was the proportion of "naturally" emitted vs. anthropogenic sources?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, according to Wiki ...
Human activity is thought to account for somewhat less than 2 teragrams (this is multiplied by about 300 when calculated as a ratio to carbon dioxide) of nitrogen oxides per year, nature for over 15 teragrams <4>.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N2O

The meaning of that first sentence isn't too clear, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC