"One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages. That one party can just impose the politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move a society forward in the 21st century. It is not an accident that China is committed to overtaking us in electric cars, solar power, energy efficiency, batteries, nuclear power and wind power. China’s leaders understand that in a world of exploding populations and rising emerging-market middle classes, demand for clean power and energy efficiency is going to soar. Beijing wants to make sure that it owns that industry and is ordering the policies to do that, including boosting gasoline prices, from the top down."
"
Our one-party democracy is worse. The fact is, on both the energy/climate legislation and health care legislation,
only the Democrats are really playing. With a few notable exceptions,
the Republican Party is standing, arms folded and saying “no.” Many of them just want President Obama to fail. Such a waste. Mr. Obama is not a socialist; he’s a centrist. But if he’s forced to depend entirely on his own party to pass legislation, he will be whipsawed by its different factions."
"The G.O.P. used to be the party of business.
Well, to compete and win in a globalized world, no one needs the burden of health insurance shifted from business to government more than American business. No one needs immigration reform — so the world’s best brainpower can come here without restrictions — more than American business. No one needs a push for clean-tech — the world’s next great global manufacturing industry — more than American business.
Yet the G.O.P. today resists national health care, immigration reform and wants to just drill, baby, drill.“
Globalization has neutered the Republican Party, leaving it to represent not the have-nots of the recession but the have-nots of globalized America,
the people who have been left behind either in reality or in their fears,” said Edward Goldberg, a global trade consultant who teaches at Baruch College. “The need to compete in a globalized world has forced the meritocracy, the multinational corporate manager, the eastern financier and the technology entrepreneur to reconsider what the Republican Party has to offer. In principle, they have left the party,
leaving behind not a pragmatic coalition but a group of ideological naysayers.”"
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/opinion/09friedman.html?emCan't agree with all Friedman says ("The G.O.P. used to be the party of business" - "used to be?"), but he does stick it to them for being the party of "no" and "ideological naysayers".