Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is It JUST Me Or Did Obama Declare the HCR Bill Must have a Public Option OR BETTER?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:53 PM
Original message
Is It JUST Me Or Did Obama Declare the HCR Bill Must have a Public Option OR BETTER?
He said very clearly that the Public Option is a means to an end. But he's open to other ideas IF THEY MEET THE SAME REQUIREMENT.

That says to me that it must be equal to or better than the Public Option at providing competition in the Insurance Market.

And after he's already rejected Baucus's plan today, it's clear that doesn't mean the terrible idea of COOPS.

That only leaves two options currently in the form of bills: HR3200 or HR676.

Am I the only one seeing this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought he was referring to triggers when he said that
he made it clear tonight that single payer is out because it's "starting from scratch" (hasn't anyone told him about Medicare?) and "too extreme" a change. No doubt the insurance companies would find it "too extreme", anyone who has actually tried to use their for profit health insurance for a major illness would not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I can see adjusting Medicare overruns, and lowering age in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Unfortunately, there is no majority of public support that is solid enough to drive it
and just a hand full of Senators to build off of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. NO he did NOT say that...
Listen again. Obama's speech treated PO as optional. There was no threat to veto PO-less plans but there was one for plans that raised the debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Just because YOU didn't hear it, doesn't mean it isn't there. Here it is:
"the public option is only a means to that end -- and we should remain open to other ideas that accomplish our ultimate goal. ... But I will not back down on the basic principle that if Americans can't find affordable coverage, we will provide you with a choice. "

He's already rejected co-ops. What else is there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I heard it the way you did
I didn't really expect a veto threat at this speech for a bill without a public option. But I think it is clear to most that the there are not other ideas that will achieve the goals he laid out. I may be wrong but I think it's a setup for the opponents of the public option. They can't get there with any of their plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I hard it... not covering as many of the population as I want
but he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Here, you obviously need this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. depends on how you define better
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 12:39 AM by TheWebHead
it became apparent I think to most people the public option is officially dead but for political reasons Obama says he supports it. frankly the whole public option debate is overrated because if they actually managed to ram it through, it would be so watered down it wouldn't be meaningfully cheaper than private insurance, and then you'd have to ask why is it necessary... money wouldn't be saved, people wouldn't be satisfied with it who use it, and it would be used as a pinata by republicans.

They'll end up providing seed money for non profit providers in states where non currently exist and there's virtual monopolies, and offer credits for low income. In exchange for everyone having to get covered, the insurance co's give up pre existing conditions rules. Anyone thinking it'll be something to the left of that is thinking with their heart rather than their head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. In addition to dropping their pre existing condition rules...
HR3200 must meet certain medical loss ratios. If they fail to meet these ratios they must provide rebates to their enrollees sufficient in amount to meet the loss ratio. So, not time to pop open the champagne but something the evil industry has never had to do before. I, for one, am glad to see they will be required to pay out a defined percentage of the premiums they collect in claims. It does stop them from being able to raise premiums or increase claims denials in order to raise their profit margins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. He said Public Option a few times..
If you do not believe me, read the transcript.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/10/us/politics/10obama.text.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. The only people talking about Baucus non plan are Baucus
or the perpetually outraged. Both groups are hanging onto it like a life boat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC