Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone tell me why Democrats voted against citizenship verification for subsidies?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 04:31 PM
Original message
Can someone tell me why Democrats voted against citizenship verification for subsidies?
Edited on Thu Sep-10-09 04:42 PM by jsamuel
I am talking to a few friends and I don't even know why they voted against the amendments proposed by the Republicans. Can someone describe to me what they would have done that the Democrats disagreed with?

Update:
Actually, come to think of it, in order to qualify for subsidies, they would have to show proof of income. The government would have to look at their IRS records to verify their income. Being illegal immigrants, they wouldn't have any and we would immediately know that they were illegal (or at the very least, that they are not citizens - raising flags). Isn't that verification?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. beats me n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. it would exclude some legal citizens- not sure of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sticky issue, eh?
Im of the opinion that anyone that contributes into a risk pool (according to some rules based on their income level) should have equal access to payouts. The bottom line about insurance is simply that it generates enough to cover the expenses, plus overhead and profit.

Of course, this model doesn't work with subsidies for private insurers, unless you verify that each covered person contributed (perhaps through payroll) to a subsidy pool. But its still weak. National health insurance could use this model potentially.

Regardless....those people should have employers, and those employers will have mandates.

Visa Residents should be included regardless. Not just a Citizenship criteria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. updated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. two reasons
One, these requirements catch virtually no non citizens and prevent many citizens from getting benefits. Two, we really should be covering illegals as well. Their medical costs are virtually non existant as they are younger by far than most people but when they do get sick and use the emergency room it costs a fortune.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because it causes more trouble. They put...
citizenship verification on Medicaid a while back and found that more citizens got screwed out of help than illegals because quite a few citizens had no proof of citizenship handy.

Besides, why should legal noncitizen residents be excluded?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Perhaps it was seen as needless redundancy. At anyrate Republicans seem to use it to claim illegals
will be covered. So I wonder if perhaps that was the motive for introducing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's not a big deal but Repukes want to make it one
Nowadays, use of the driver's license will work. If a person has one, they are legally here. The Real ID act brought this about.

repukes won't be happy until there are national ID cards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. funny, because their base hates the idea of national ID cards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The libertarian types hate it
But the xenophobe types would love it. It passed the Republican congress and Boosh administration to combat terra, so it can hardly be a problem for most of them. Just the survivalist types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC