Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Public Option = No Mandate...period!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 11:12 PM
Original message
No Public Option = No Mandate...period!!


A mandate without a Public Option (Medicare for all) is Fascism.

Explain to me how it isn't.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm actually a little confused on how it is.
You are making the affirmative statement. The responsibility is yours to make the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-10-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My understanding is...

...the definition of Fascism being when government and corporate interests merge.

USA Inc.

Health insurance, as a legal requirement, is our government forcing us into corporate interests.

You can choose whether to drive a car or insure your property.
This is different.

----
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovepg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hear you Shred. I finally am figuring out this whole reform BS is a smokescreen to ...
Edited on Fri Sep-11-09 01:03 AM by lovepg
Bailout the health care industry. In Obamas speech he talked about the health care industry being too big
a part of our economy to go with single payer and put them out of business. TOO BIG TO FAIL. Sound familar?
What better way to get our tax dollars than to make us all ante up to buy their insurance? 46 million new customers. WOW.
They know the business model they have now is unsustainable which explains why they are on board.
And all they have to do is put up with at the worst a very limited public option.
They gotta be laughing all the way to the bank.
As usual we are the SUCKERS!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. TOO BIG TO FAIL! (bubble...bailout...sounds kinda familiar) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. that is the direction I see this heading also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's corporatism, really.
Corporatism is a system of economic, political, and social organization where corporate groups such as business, ethnic, farmer, labour, military, patronage, or religious groups are joined together into a single governing body in which the different groups are mandated to negotiate with each other to establish policies in the interest of the multiple groups within the body.<1> Corporatism views society as being alike to an organic body in which each corporate group is viewed as a necessary organ for society to function properly.<2> Corporatism is based on the sociological concept of functionalism.<3> Countries that have corporatist systems typically utilize strong state intervention to direct corporatist policies and to prevent conflict between the groups.<4>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. And the possible Public Option is only for those who don't have insurance. It's not
Medicare for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Medicare for those who want in would be a start n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. I agree with your subject line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's not Fascism because it has nothing to do with an Italian political movement of the 1930's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. "Corporatism" is a much better word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC