LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:08 AM
Original message |
*IF* a bill WITHOUT a public option is signed into law, would my outrage be ok? |
|
I posted a similar Op before, and promised to keep an open mind, but now that Pelosi is stepping back from the public option, again, already my painful compromise from single payer, someone please, please talk me back from the ledge.
|
fascisthunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
1. If it Happenes, I will know corporate Fascism in entrenched in the Democratic Party |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Just jump. Just about everyone else here has. |
Buzz Clik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Lather. Rinse. Repeat. (rinsing is optional) |
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Not yet. I just wanna know, how far should we compromise with a party that is giving up nothing. |
|
and it be OK for us to NOT do anything about it.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. Ah. Pre-whine whine. That's a new one. +10 for creativity. |
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
19. I'm wondering how this contributes to the discussion other than to say, "Ah, pre asshole assholery" |
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
These "If" this then the "world will explode" threads are so numerous as to make this site dreadfully tiresome and depressing.
|
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:07 PM
Original message |
No, he's wrong, and so are you. Distorting my words does not marginalize my position |
|
if you think that "talk me down from the ledge means "world will explode". I didn't ask you to substitute your judgement for mine, thanks.
Please post your disdain for "world will explode" threads on threads that ACTUALLY say the world will explode.
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Well, that's a lame argument |
|
As if you can't differentiate between a metaphor and the literal spoken word.
Fail.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
36. It's fun watching the intellectual dishonesty of people deliberately trading on ambiguity, though. |
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-12-09 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
37. It's fun being accused of intellectual dishonesty by pre asshole assholery types. |
|
My argument was neither incorrect nor dishonest.
Epic Fail.
|
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-12-09 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
38. No it's not, but your reference |
|
to differentiate between spoken word and metaphor is LAUGHABLE,given this medium.
But thanks for chimin' in with ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of worth.
|
Skink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message |
3. They're discussing the amount of the fines now. |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-11-09 11:10 AM by Skink
|
Buzz Clik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message |
4. You need approval? Why? |
|
Will you be outraged if the public option was available to the uninsured and no one else?
Will you be outraged if the public option was available to everyone but you?
|
vi5
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message |
6. From what I've been told.... |
|
..we're supposed to just shrug our shoulders, and apparently rejoice in happiness that democrats aren't marching in unified lockstep.
So to sum up, I'm supposed to be o.k. with people in the US continuing to get poor healthcare and going bankrupt becaus of illnesses and insurance company pockets being lined, because it means that the democratic party is chock full of a cornucopia of differing opinions and beliefs.
|
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Your feelings are your feelings - it doesn't matter what anyone else thinks is 'ok' |
|
I'd judge the bill in its entirety, not just based on whether one aspect was included or not. But that's just me.
|
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. My feelings aren't the point, but I you should have known that... |
|
if they just eliminate pre-existing, no public option, THIS is the best we could do?
|
stillrockin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Yes. This plan is a big wet kiss to insurance cartel. |
joeycola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. yes, it is at this point. |
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Hey, why shouldn't the insurance companies make oodles of $$$ off taxpayers just like the banks? |
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
24. I know!! I feel like, elevens. WHY on earth should we bother to protect profiteering? |
nashville_brook
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
14. your outrage, if directed at anyone with a (D) by their name, is NOT OK under any circumstances |
|
you WILL stomp your feet and cheer with the loudest cheerleaders on this internet discussion board or else suffer the consequences of cyber-pariah status!!! who do you think you are, anyway?
you... you... FREETHINKER!!
shut up and drink the KOOL-AID already.
:evilgrin:
|
ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
15. I'm on that ledge too |
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
28. welcome. I'll hang until the last dog dies, that what' we're s'posed to do. nt |
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
16. ask that question when the bill gets passed without a public option. |
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
26. on this I concede. There is no bill signed as of yet, and I am *trying* to keep the faith |
|
but we have ALREADY compromised from single payer and WE CONTROL THE HOUSES. If they can't do it now, the repigs might as well win.
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Outraged just because the politicians sold you to the insurance companies? How dare you! |
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. That is how I am starting to feel, but this could be political theatre |
|
but if this gets marched back from a robust public option because some repig who would never vote for it anyway made a turd in the punchbowl, I will be pissed. The turd loving repig won't capitulate anyway so why bother? *I'm* not drinking that punch with repig turds in it, and I don't think you should have to either.
|
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Hell, if a bill is passed WITH a public option but not making it accessible to all, or if there are other horrid provisions, you're welcome to be outraged anyway, despite the PO.
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
20. I would at least like to see a triggered PO |
|
Getting a trigger removed later will be easier than insreting a PO later.
I'd rather see a PO now, but I don't see how we convince even one of these Senators to come down on the side of the PO:
Pryor Lincoln Landrieu Nelson NElson Conrad Baucus Carper Lieberman Bayh
Got any ideas on how to get even one? Keep in mind we need two to insure we get past the fact that Byrd won't vote for it in reconciliation on principle.
|
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. a triggered PO? Jesus H Christ on a cracker, WHAT ON EARTH did THEY give up? |
|
triggered by what? books they'll cook anyway? :banghead:
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
32. The idea is get a triggered PO now |
|
then remove the trigger later.
That's easier than getting a full blown public option later.
If we can get a full blow PO now, great, but I'm just not seeing it happen in the Senate.
|
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-12-09 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
41. The idea of a trigger now to be removed later is just kicking the can down the road |
BzaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-12-09 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #41 |
42. I would MUCH rather kick the can slightly down the road than destroy the can for a generation. |
|
If we don't pass anything, it will probably take a decade or two to get back our current majorities with a president like Obama. Then we will be right back to today. If we pass something, that gives us a huge opportunity to change it later. One major reason this is so hard is because it is such a large bill that opponents can find many tiny issues and exploit them. It will be much harder to do this for something so technical (such as "removing a trigger").
|
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-12-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #42 |
43. I'd rather they use the letter of the law and pass real reform instead of corporate reach arounds |
|
We need fifty. We have fifty. Real Reform. Do it for the skipper. Mind you, I have ALREADY COMPROMISED from single payer. What has the other side conceded?
|
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
23. Oh, and how about we don't NEED them with reconciliation, and you know it. Biden has a vote if we |
|
need him, and you know that too.
|
earth mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Your outrage is not ok on DU. But in the real world, I'm sure there are millions & millions |
|
who are furious right now. I know I am. :grr:
p.s. What could anyone expect from Pelosi-the woman who took Impeachment off the table? Or any of the corporatist powers that be in Washington DC?! :argh:
|
Old Hob
(296 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
30. I can't wait to see the PO eligibility criteria. I'm sure I'll meet it... |
natrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:23 PM
Response to Original message |
31. but but obama made such a dazzling speach...everything will be ok kids,he said so |
Ikonoklast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |
33. If you might be set on fire one day, will you feel the pain now? |
|
Getting outraged over hypotheticals is an exercise in futility.
|
TheWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. So is putting blind faith in pretty speeches. |
Ikonoklast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-11-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
|
Or blind opposition? Who would you say is the bigger fool?
I'll take the man on faith. It's why I voted for him.
And you voted for...?
|
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-12-09 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
39. Since there is no "blind opposition"...he SAID the things we oppose |
|
The election is over. Now our work begins.
|
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-12-09 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
40. so is snark in the face of rational discussion. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |