Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*IF* a bill WITHOUT a public option is signed into law, would my outrage be ok?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:08 AM
Original message
*IF* a bill WITHOUT a public option is signed into law, would my outrage be ok?
I posted a similar Op before, and promised to keep an open mind, but now that Pelosi is stepping back from the public option, again, already my painful compromise from single payer, someone please, please talk me back from the ledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. If it Happenes, I will know corporate Fascism in entrenched in the Democratic Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just jump. Just about everyone else here has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Lather. Rinse. Repeat. (rinsing is optional)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Not yet. I just wanna know, how far should we compromise with a party that is giving up nothing.
and it be OK for us to NOT do anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Ah. Pre-whine whine. That's a new one. +10 for creativity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I'm wondering how this contributes to the discussion other than to say, "Ah, pre asshole assholery"
nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. No, he's right
These "If" this then the "world will explode" threads are so numerous as to make this site dreadfully tiresome and depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:07 PM
Original message
No, he's wrong, and so are you. Distorting my words does not marginalize my position
if you think that "talk me down from the ledge means "world will explode". I didn't ask you to substitute your judgement for mine, thanks.

Please post your disdain for "world will explode" threads on threads that ACTUALLY say the world will explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. Well, that's a lame argument
As if you can't differentiate between a metaphor and the literal spoken word.

Fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. It's fun watching the intellectual dishonesty of people deliberately trading on ambiguity, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. It's fun being accused of intellectual dishonesty by pre asshole assholery types.
My argument was neither incorrect nor dishonest.

Epic Fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
38. No it's not, but your reference
to differentiate between spoken word and metaphor is LAUGHABLE,given this medium.

But thanks for chimin' in with ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. They're discussing the amount of the fines now.
Edited on Fri Sep-11-09 11:10 AM by Skink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. You need approval? Why?
Will you be outraged if the public option was available to the uninsured and no one else?

Will you be outraged if the public option was available to everyone but you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. From what I've been told....
..we're supposed to just shrug our shoulders, and apparently rejoice in happiness that democrats aren't marching in unified lockstep.

So to sum up, I'm supposed to be o.k. with people in the US continuing to get poor healthcare and going bankrupt becaus of illnesses and insurance company pockets being lined, because it means that the democratic party is chock full of a cornucopia of differing opinions and beliefs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. Your feelings are your feelings - it doesn't matter what anyone else thinks is 'ok'
I'd judge the bill in its entirety, not just based on whether one aspect was included or not. But that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. My feelings aren't the point, but I you should have known that...
if they just eliminate pre-existing, no public option, THIS is the best we could do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes. This plan is a big wet kiss to insurance cartel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. yes, it is at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hey, why shouldn't the insurance companies make oodles of $$$ off taxpayers just like the banks?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. I know!! I feel like, elevens. WHY on earth should we bother to protect profiteering?
series
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. your outrage, if directed at anyone with a (D) by their name, is NOT OK under any circumstances
you WILL stomp your feet and cheer with the loudest cheerleaders on this internet discussion board or else suffer the consequences of cyber-pariah status!!! who do you think you are, anyway?

you... you... FREETHINKER!!

shut up and drink the KOOL-AID already.



:evilgrin:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. I'm on that ledge too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. welcome. I'll hang until the last dog dies, that what' we're s'posed to do. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
16. ask that question when the bill gets passed without a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. on this I concede. There is no bill signed as of yet, and I am *trying* to keep the faith
but we have ALREADY compromised from single payer and WE CONTROL THE HOUSES. If they can't do it now, the repigs might as well win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
17. Outraged just because the politicians sold you to the insurance companies? How dare you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. That is how I am starting to feel, but this could be political theatre
but if this gets marched back from a robust public option because some repig who would never vote for it anyway made a turd in the punchbowl, I will be pissed. The turd loving repig won't capitulate anyway so why bother? *I'm* not drinking that punch with repig turds in it, and I don't think you should have to either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. Sure thing!
Hell, if a bill is passed WITH a public option but not making it accessible to all, or if there are other horrid provisions, you're welcome to be outraged anyway, despite the PO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. I would at least like to see a triggered PO
Getting a trigger removed later will be easier than insreting a PO later.

I'd rather see a PO now, but I don't see how we convince even one of these Senators to come down on the side of the PO:

Pryor
Lincoln
Landrieu
Nelson
NElson
Conrad
Baucus
Carper
Lieberman
Bayh

Got any ideas on how to get even one? Keep in mind we need two to insure we get past the fact that Byrd won't vote for it in reconciliation on principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. a triggered PO? Jesus H Christ on a cracker, WHAT ON EARTH did THEY give up?
triggered by what? books they'll cook anyway? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. The idea is get a triggered PO now
then remove the trigger later.

That's easier than getting a full blown public option later.

If we can get a full blow PO now, great, but I'm just not seeing it happen in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. The idea of a trigger now to be removed later is just kicking the can down the road
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. I would MUCH rather kick the can slightly down the road than destroy the can for a generation.
If we don't pass anything, it will probably take a decade or two to get back our current majorities with a president like Obama. Then we will be right back to today. If we pass something, that gives us a huge opportunity to change it later. One major reason this is so hard is because it is such a large bill that opponents can find many tiny issues and exploit them. It will be much harder to do this for something so technical (such as "removing a trigger").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. I'd rather they use the letter of the law and pass real reform instead of corporate reach arounds
We need fifty. We have fifty. Real Reform. Do it for the skipper. Mind you, I have ALREADY COMPROMISED from single payer. What has the other side conceded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Oh, and how about we don't NEED them with reconciliation, and you know it. Biden has a vote if we
need him, and you know that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. Your outrage is not ok on DU. But in the real world, I'm sure there are millions & millions
who are furious right now. I know I am. :grr:

p.s. What could anyone expect from Pelosi-the woman who took Impeachment off the table? Or any of the corporatist powers that be in Washington DC?! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Hob Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
30. I can't wait to see the PO eligibility criteria. I'm sure I'll meet it...
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
31. but but obama made such a dazzling speach...everything will be ok kids,he said so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
33. If you might be set on fire one day, will you feel the pain now?
Getting outraged over hypotheticals is an exercise in futility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. So is putting blind faith in pretty speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Blind faith?
Or blind opposition? Who would you say is the bigger fool?

I'll take the man on faith.
It's why I voted for him.

And you voted for...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. Since there is no "blind opposition"...he SAID the things we oppose
The election is over. Now our work begins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. so is snark in the face of rational discussion.
and you know it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC