Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama will have a worse job-creation record than George W Bush...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:48 AM
Original message
Barack Obama will have a worse job-creation record than George W Bush...
in his first four years in office.

You will hear much more about this subject in the future but there is a distinction to be made.

When GWB took office, the unemployment rate was 4.1% and he inherited a huge surplus from Bill Clinton. Barack Obama inherited a depression from George W Bush. And a world-wide economic collapse.

It is doubtful that we will have any jobs created during the first four years of Barack Obama. Unless, of course, the economy gets back on course fairly quickly. With the damage that was done, that would be a very optimistic outlook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well GWB holds the record for job-destroying, so it all balances
out. Bush's work is still ongoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Altoid_Cyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Let's not forget his hard work in destroying two countries also.
Well, actually it's two and a half if you include the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Indeed! What a wonder and a marvel was the Son of a Bush.
Edited on Fri Sep-11-09 12:03 PM by MineralMan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Altoid_Cyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Just think, if only someone had taken the time to neuter Prescott Bush. none of this would
Edited on Fri Sep-11-09 12:15 PM by Altoid_Cyclist
have happened. You're correct Kentuck, they'll use any distortions that they can or just invent some inane illogical reason(s) to say that we were better off when the idiot son was running things with Darth Cheney to advise him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Though he'll come out way ahead on the "Americans killed for a lie" stat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Very true.
I am only pointing out a future political issue of the Repubs. I don't personally see any parallel but I'm sure the Repubs will use it to their advantage, if possible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. If we break even by the end of his first term, I'll be MORE than happy.
Obama just got handed the worst economic fuck-up in 75 years (the last one, not coincidentally, was ALSO caused and made worse by bad Republican economic policy). Obama's also getting an economic situation handed to him that was caused by 28 years of Free-Trade Laissez Fail with very little regulations. This isn't just an average mess he's being forced to clean up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. "doubtful that we will have any jobs created during the first four years"
Unemployment is expected to peak around Q3-2010. Jobs will be created after that.

While there may not be a net gain of jobs (i.e jobs lost prior to Q3-2010 > jobs created after Q3-2010) it is virtually impossible that no jobs (i.e. not a single month of job gains) will happen in first 4 years.

If it does it won't matter who is at fault I 100% guarantee Obama will lose re-election in a landslide.

Luckily no economist supports a theory that we will have continued job losses all the way to Nov-2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. As with Bush, they will note the "net jobs" created...
Hopefully we will recover enough to have some jobs created but the numbers that have been lost already will be difficult to make up. Sorry for the confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ok I agree with you net jobs will be VERY difficult to get above 0.
2.8 millions lost since day Obama took office.

We are losing about 300K per month. Say it declined linearly (300K, 290K, 270K, etc) to 0 by Oct 2010.

That would be another ~2.0 million jobs lost.

So say we hit 0 monthly losses in Oct 2010 likely total lost "so far" will be around 4.0 - 4.8 million lost.

Nov 2010 to Nov 2012 is 24 months. We would need to see 200K jobs created per month to be back at net gain/loss of 0 by election day.

Considering substantial momentum is built 6 months form election day that would be more like 250K net jobs created per month from Oct 2010 to Apr 2012 to hit net gain/loss of 0.

Both are possible but are difficult numbers to hit. Even worse would be a period of front loaded slow growth. Say 6 months where average job creation is about 50K jobs (+200K on month, -100K next, etc). That would require more like 350K-400K jobs per month for remaining 12 months to get back at net of 0.

So I think your right Obama likely will have to run for re-election having a net loss of jobs during his first term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Which makes it even more amazing that Bill Clinton averaged..
about 225,000 per month for 8 straight years!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC