Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bad car accident

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:13 PM
Original message
Bad car accident
(In Honor of my best friend Scott who died in a car accident)

John was in a bad accident. Car was on fire, he was bleeding bad.

A bunch of socialist firefighters showed up and pulled him from the wreckage (his spouse never did get a bill for that, and the firefighters never did check his insurance card).

Plopped there onto the side of the road. But wait! He was taken to the hospital, who could not deny him care in an emergency.

Patched up quickly by our fine doctors/nurses/technicians.

"Well, all we need to do is operate and fix your liver, which was damaged in the accident, and you will be good to go."

Insurance company denies the operation, he used to drink some so they see it as a pre-existing condition (even though all previous tests showed his liver as ok).

He dies.

What is wrong with this picture?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. In a nutshell: a for-profit corporation got between John and his Doctor.
Edited on Fri Sep-11-09 01:17 PM by jtrockville
I'd like to know why the medical community hasn't risen up agaist this sooner.

Edited to add: I'm so sorry for your loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Becaue they're too busy demanding protection
from accountability from the results of their negligence, as well as protecting their precious profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. FYI...
Many Nurses have been fighting for this for a long time. The for profit business model just doesn't work. We figured that out one the bean counter increased the Nurse patient ratio to unsafe levels and they tried to cross train the house keeping staff to perform cathaterizations. I swear to God that one is true! Nurses couldn't shoot THAT trial balloon down fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yes, the nurses organizations have been very outspoken.
Thanks for all the hard work from these folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing. It points out the fact that we have the BEST HEALTH CARE SYSTEM ON EARTH.
If you do not agree, you must be a commie-nazi-pinko-fag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. This.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. The corporate death panel made their decision. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. True story?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. See here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. And about my friend scott
He lost a lot of blood and was rushed to hospital, and died that night.

He was not denied health care, but the link I posted above shows some are denied life saving care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. How would they know about drinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. You think an insurance company does not know :)
Doctors asked these kind of questions all the time, and they keep medical histories.

See my link above for more info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I just had cataract surgery and part of the pre-surgery
workup and paperwork was to answer questions like about whether you drink or smoke and how much. It's standard in any paperwork because that's how the insurance companies get their info. You can't get your surgery without answering those questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Who would answer that they drank enough to get liver damage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I guess we have to choose between being honest
with our personal habits so our doctor isn't in-the-dark, vs risking losing reimbursement for our medical bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. it proves there are "death panels" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. About half of our
entire economy is devoted to profit from human misery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. The problem with that kind of sideways argument...
Is that the other side can just as easily point to a directly conflicting case that shows the opposite.

One thing I have learned in life is that it's always best to distill the argument to simplest point.

Is health care a right? Should it be?

If not is it not a moral imperative for the wealthiest nation on earth to ensure health care for all?

If you can't win a person over on those simple terms, your wasting your time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I will distill it down even further
We spend a ton on defense to save lives - pool our money for that.

And yet more die from lack of proper care than from Osama/etc.

Simply by proxy we should be paying for health care for all of us, and yet folks are not interested in saving lives when there are not cool weapons involved and death of enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. sickening!
they denied coverage because he used to drink?! I hope his wife sued the bastards!!!

I'm sorry to hear about your friend .... :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. For clarification please - they did not deny my friend care
My friend got care, but still died. Based on my research (see other threads I have posted on it all) some folks have been denied care for various other things (to save companies money).

It was a mix of something that occurred in real life (my friend was helped by fire dept, did get to hospital, later died) and what we see happening daily with people be denying cared based on money (like Andy was).

Sorry for the confusion. I should have been more clear in my OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. insurance company = death panel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. OK Here's where I have a serious problems with all of this........
1st, that an insurance company denied coverage for a life saving procedure. Despicable isn't too strong a word for their actions.

But secondly, this isn't the first time I have read an account where a person who was already in a hospital, under a doctor's care needed life saving treatment and was denied resulting in that person's death. What boggles my mind is the medical personnel NOT SAVING THE PERSON'S LIFE ANYWAY. I realize someone has to pay for their services, but my God how do you walk away from a dying person when you know you can save them. Do you just say to them, sorry Joe no tickie, no shirtie? DO you pack up their pajamas for them and say go home and die? Or do you just leave them there to die a slow painful death? When does the "no one is denied health care" kick in?

The examples the President gave in his speech.....a man halfway through chemo...denied further treatment....dies. A woman needing a double mastecomy....denied.....dies. When does the medical profession step up and say I don't care if you have insurance or not. I am a doctor, and if I can save your life I will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. They would get fired instantly before they even saw the patient again
And no hospital would be allowed to hire them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC