In a signal on the fate of the public option in H.R. 3200, the Obama Administration today decided to impose tariffs on imported tires from China. China has already called the move protectionist and vows tough times at the upcoming G-20, but the United Steelworkers brought the complaint and Obama needs the negotiating room with pro-labor Democrats.
However, in a move to cushion the blow,
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jmHySATbh1PLQn8u8-GHcu03eoiwD9AL0EDO3">Obama didn't go with the full U.S. International Trade Commission recommendations.
The federal trade panel recommended a 55 percent tariff in the first year, 45 percent in the second year and 35 percent in the third year.
Instead, the
tariffs will begin at 35%, and then fall to 30% and 25% in the next two years.
With this gift to pro-labor Democrats in the House and Senate, is a deal being struck to win a place at the table for a public option? This will shore up union support for whomever might be hurt by H.R. 3200. My question is this - are the pro-labor seats in the House and Senate pro-public option or are they Blue Dogs in general? I honestly don't know and will start digging myself. But if you've got more information than I've got right now, I'd appreciate your contribution.
If the seats in districts with strongholds in the unions are pro-public option, this is a signal that the public option is likely out. If the seats are Blue Dogs, that means the public option is likely in. Which is it?