Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC This Week's Biased Panel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:17 AM
Original message
ABC This Week's Biased Panel
Today's version of This Week will have Jay Rockefeller, Mary Landrieu, Kathleen Sebelius, and Tim Pawlenty. I understand that some might think that I am trying to argue that the panel is liberally biased, but I am actually arguing the opposite or at least slightly the opposite. If one looks deeper at the panel one will learn the panel is biased against the public option. Rockfeller is for the public option. Landrieu is against the public option and is expected to say that she will block any bill that includes a public option. Although Sebellius is in the Obama administration, which is democratic, she will not say anything more than what Obama has said on the public option; therefore, I do not expect her to be that big of a supporter of the public option. Finally, Pawlenty is against Obama's version of healthcare reform and is expected to promote the idea that states could implement the 10th Amendment which would allow them to block the Obama version of healthcare reform. So on the panel you have one person supporting the public option, two people against the public option, and one person who is pretty much in the middle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. And not one of them...including Rockefeller, is a liberal
I think that is the underlying point behind the casting decisions of the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was glad to see Pawlenty admit that the bills don't extend health care to illegals
He had to retreat to a new line in the sand. That being the enforcement piece.

We will win that argument. I can hear it now, "So now you want doctors to practice law in the treatment room? Why do Republicans want to get between the doctor and his time for practicing medicine?"

Any rebuttal from the wingnuts can be refuted. Even the front office has better things to do than interrogating new patients. The wording of our responses can make them look so wrong.

I never expected a popular Republican like Pawlenty to give the retreat signal on this issue but there he was waving a flag of defeat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC