Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Norman Borlaug Dead. Who Is Norman Borlaug? Well Worth Finding Out!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:10 PM
Original message
Norman Borlaug Dead. Who Is Norman Borlaug? Well Worth Finding Out!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/13/norman-borlaug-dead_n_284886.html

"Norman E. Borlaug saved more lives than any man in human history," said Josette Sheeran, executive director of the U.N. World Food Program. "His heart was as big as his brilliant mind, but it was his passion and compassion that moved the world."

He was known as the father of the "green revolution," which transformed agriculture through high-yield crop varieties and other innovations, helping to more than double world food production between 1960 and 1990. Many experts credit the green revolution with averting global famine during the second half of the 20th century and saving perhaps 1 billion lives.

"He has probably done more and is known by fewer people than anybody that has done that much," said Dr. Ed Runge, retired head of Texas A&M University's Department of Soil and Crop Sciences and a close friend who persuaded Borlaug teach at the school. "He made the world a better place – a much better place."

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack called Borlaug "simply one of the world's best. A determined, dedicated, but humble man who believed we had the collective duty and knowledge to eradicate hunger worldwide."

...

Borlaug often said wheat was only a vehicle for his real interest, which was to improve people's lives.

"We must recognize the fact that adequate food is only the first requisite for life," he said in his Nobel acceptance speech. "For a decent and humane life we must also provide an opportunity for good education, remunerative employment, comfortable housing, good clothing and effective and compassionate medical care."


RIP. Glad to have learned a little bit about him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Darling of the reactionary Heritgate Foundation. Little a bit more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. what
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't hold that against him
Edited on Sun Sep-13-09 09:31 PM by izquierdista
The right wing is always trotting out the canard "teach a man to fish and he eats for a day, teach him to fish and he can eat for a lifetime", so naturally they glommed onto Borlaug since he exemplified that. Where the right wing falls down on the job is that they don't want to spend any $$ to teach poor people how to fish, or how to plant crops, or how to do anything. They expect illiterate peasants to learn how to do things by the magic of the free market, as if ignorance creates a 'demand' for schooling (private, charter type schools, with vouchers, and using materials sold by Neil Bush).

Borlaug did his wheat experiments in Mexico and then exported the program wholesale to India, which the right wingers could never stomach, as it would require being close enough to breathe the same air as brown people. Sure, they liked him, but would they DO any of the things he did, or put their $$ on the line to support his ideas? Not on your life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Borlaug = Monsanto.
Fuck them both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. What a pathetic, disgusting post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. No, it isn't
He inspired the creation of international crop research institutes that collected land race seeds of all the major food crops, preserved them for posterity and made them available patent free -- like the International Rice Research Institute.

Only decades later did Monsanto begin trying to patent seed crops. Don't blame Monsanto on Borlaug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. he's also won the admiration of Penn (of Penn and Teller fame)
i happen to like Penn, but many liberals do not.

i also happen to admire borlaug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Short term the Green Revolution was a miracle
Long term it has polluted our soil, water and air with massive quantities of chemicals, driven small farmers out of business, and created a soil crisis in our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Funny how that works
Free trading seemed badass too at first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. +1 My thoughts exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. primary benefit of green rev went to ag corps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Right, and those folks in India just MAGICALLY stopped starving!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. they weren't starving because there wasn't enough food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. What an ignorant thing to say.
It lifted millions of small farmers out of poverty and hunger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. Without it, many would have starved to death
but yes, it has caused problems. Every significant action does. I guarantee that a significant fraction of today's panaceas will, in retrospect, create massive problems in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. A scientific hero who saved million of lives.
Shame of the posters in this thread bashing him.

"We must recognize the fact that adequate food is only the first requisite for life," he said in his Nobel acceptance speech. "For a decent and humane life we must also provide an opportunity for good education, remunerative employment, comfortable housing, good clothing and effective and compassionate medical care."

Wow, what an evil man! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thank you.
There are certain people who shit on all technological advancement, no matter how good it is. They assume that all technology must have some sinister dark side if only they can find it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Yup.
Dr. Borlaug saved more than 200,000,000 people. Not many can say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. The bashing is shockingly ignorant, mean spirited and counterfactual. Then you have the Malthusians
who are saying that by feeding millions of people he only made sure more people would starve in the future (of course, some undefined dystopian future that they have wet dreams about).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. ty, Bloo, for posting ~
:takingpalmfromface&wavingtoyouwithitwithwigglyfingers:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. lol! Nice emoticon!
Just thought he sounded like a smart guy who tried his damnedest to make the world a better place, and I never heard of him, so I thought there might be others that hadn't. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AusDem Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. no, didn't know that he was the man behind it
my father talks about the green revolution in India (as that is my background). Basically there is a chance that he, and therefore I, wouldn't be alive today if this hadn't happened. So I think this guy's a-ok.

to those who blame him for overpopulation, its quite disturbing. So you would rather that millions (maybe billions) of people had died of starvation? You can't be a supporter FOR healthcare and then not care that this man was literally responsible for providing food security for so many people.

food scarcity is a horrific way to control populations. Contraception, education and the emancipation of women. Hit those three things and you're on your way. (Either that or the Chinese method).

Thanks for posting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
21. He also inspired an original Star Trek episode
Edited on Mon Sep-14-09 06:44 AM by depakid


---------



Triticale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC