|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:04 PM Original message |
Obama blasts Dems in Congress for wanting to censure Joe "You Lie!" Wilson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. I don't think this is Obama's call to make. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. I think he owes the American people an apology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:22 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaydeeBug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
76. I agree too. Respectfully, the apology is not ONLY OWED to Obama, rather to all of us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
45. Its Obama's call more than anyone else in the country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 07:12 PM Response to Reply #45 |
115. Nah, we got separation of powers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malikshah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
61. Bingo! Obama, you did your part; now let Congress do theirs. Stop dancing to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 04:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
90. For one thing..the headline is wrong..PO did NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. I wish President Obama would let Congress do their JOB, to include censuring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I wish they actually could do their job competently - like inacting good legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
46. Yes, but its Obama job to tell Congress how to do their job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. It's not his job...Congress and the office of the president are completely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:19 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. The presidency is a bully bullpit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pangolin2 (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 04:49 PM Response to Reply #60 |
88. bully bullpit!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chatnoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:41 PM Response to Reply #88 |
107. .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
54. Perhaps Obama feels Congress should be doing their job - like getting that healthcare done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #54 |
110. If a censure is not passed, the next time Obama addresses Congress, guess what will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. Blasts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kadie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Maybe he was yelling when he said it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. That was my first thought. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
37. Because it makes us click on the link. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
91. Because John Aravosis is a big sack of lying SHITE.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
4. Great - every time progressives or Congress stands up to the other side... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Let them stand up for important stuff versus political crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. It isn't "political crap" - if nothing is done, you can expect this at every speech. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. let them and inact good legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. It's also their job to decide if someone has broken the rules - not the prez. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. He has to play it that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Just wish he'd stop commenting on others doing their job - Congress or progressives... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
48. He didn't slap down his side. Read what he actually said and not the fantasy headline that is there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Just his latest weasel words - reminds me of his "looking forward" crap. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. "Weasel Words"? He said it is taking the focus off healthcare. How is that using "weasel words"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. He's refusing to get his hands dirty. I don't expect him to say anything that can... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:16 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Erm, I'm his supporter and even before he said this, I thought we should move on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:19 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Let me add to this: He was asked. If he had said "Well, let congress do whatever it wants" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:26 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. I disagree - and we can't just move on, unless you don't mind every speech... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:34 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. If it means the Republican party continues to be revealed as nuts, let them throw their tantrums |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Congress would be foolish not to put a stop to it now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stklurker (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:38 PM Response to Reply #71 |
106. keep your eye on the ball |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 06:30 PM Response to Reply #106 |
111. imo it's silly to think you can't do two things at once - I'm tired of weak Dems... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stklurker (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 08:43 PM Response to Reply #111 |
117. responsible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
73. word up.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
95. I think people are buying Politico's spin again. The exchange from 60 Minutes: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:36 PM Response to Reply #95 |
119. I recommend this post. It shows Obama's own words. The OP totally misrepresented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 01:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
40. amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
52. DLC never allows neocons to be held accountable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:27 PM Response to Reply #52 |
66. True - it's enough to make you sick. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:20 PM Response to Reply #52 |
118. DK voted against holding people accountable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 04:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
92. Yeah, I'm sure you would jump on that John Aravosis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
5. Anything to keep us working stiffs from getting health care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Yes - we are working for working Americans - see we spent a week discussing censure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
6. A good way to put distance between himself and Congress on this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I don't agree - he should just be quiet about it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
15. Doesn't sound like much of a 'blast' to me. Overreact much? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quasimodem (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. Wilson is not apologizing to President Obama, now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
18. WH still dreams. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
22. Grow a sack, Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
24. Or...President makes comment, keeping story in the limelight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kjackson227 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
25. I disagree with President Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #25 |
41. kind of like prosecuting the * regime, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pangolin2 (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
89. Maybe he's just taking the 'turn the other cheek' approach... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
93. PO didn't say anything about The House not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
26. This is almost funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Juche (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
27. It worked for Dukakis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:53 PM Response to Reply #27 |
75. awesome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
28. That's a stupid title. Obama didn't blast Dems in Congress. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diane R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:36 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I totally agree. Stupid title that doesn't reflect his statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
96. It's a gawd Damn LIE..I know what this asshole does now..he lies.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
94. Thanks for noticing..the usual Obama haters didn't bother to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iceman66 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
29. I agree with Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
87. Amen. Distraction is one of their main tools. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
31. I watched his interview on CBS last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
99. It's John Aravosis, maliase..he's the one who LIED. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
32. There must be institutional consequences. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TiredOldMan (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
33. I agree with President Obama. Let's not get distracted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
34. Joe Wilson has wet dreams about becoming the centerpiece of "Beer Summit II" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
35. There's a big difference between "blast" and "downplay" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
36. Politico again.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 01:38 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Good point IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #36 |
97. But, John Aravosis is the one with the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #97 |
102. I agree, the President is not 'blasting' the Dems at all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:11 PM Response to Reply #36 |
98. And, really all I had to do was see the name John Aravosis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #98 |
103. Yes, sadly, he seems to have lost his larger focus in his apparent dislike of the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
38. "Blasts"???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
39. I wish he'd summon the balls to "blast" those Democrats who are fucking up health care reform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 06:42 PM Response to Reply #39 |
112. PO has enough Cajones but john aravosis is a teenie weinie weinie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
43. he knows the fucking media would talk about nothing else for the next month |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
44. That is incorrect. He's not 'blasting' congress, he's blasting the fact that we're talking about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
47. Wilson should be jailed and stripped of his seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
50. What ridiculous spin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
56. Okay, everybody say it along with me: Bi-partisanship, Looking Forward Not Back, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
58. I agree 100% with Obama. This is just getting ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:23 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. What would censuring accomplish? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:24 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Seriously! That's all we're doing - elevating Wilson to hero status for the right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherish44 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:25 PM Response to Reply #58 |
64. Censuring this guy would turn him into a hero to the jagoff base of the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. He already is a hero to the fucking "morans". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. But if censured, couldn't he be forced to resign if he violated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. To my knowlege yes, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #58 |
78. lets take a page from kerry's playbook and just ignore the swiftboaters.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 03:45 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. You're right, I mean healthcare can just wait on the backburner while we make a GOP hero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 04:03 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. how much effort is involved to censure this guy?!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 04:07 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Yes and he will stay there as long as we keep the guy in the news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. just like the swiftboaters went away when kerry ignored them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
68. You're right, Mr. President. That being said, Wilson must be censured |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
74. Failure to censure will encourage more of the same behavior and worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 03:43 PM Response to Reply #74 |
79. Exactly. He Keeps Acting Like He's Dealing With Reasonable People Who Will Eventually Listen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:18 PM Response to Reply #74 |
101. I saw the interview and PO didn't blast the Dems.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #74 |
105. Actually I think censuring him will encourage more of the same behavior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
77. ok "Leave it to Beaver"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
80. I totally agree with Obama on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
82. Misleading headline. Most mild mannered "blast" I've seen in a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Tiger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 03:59 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #82 |
100. It's another LIE from john aravosis.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:46 PM Response to Reply #100 |
109. And all these folks here chiming in on an interview they obviously didn't even watch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 06:55 PM Response to Reply #109 |
113. UUUUOOOOWEEEEE! When I first came |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
104. Strategically the White House is correct, it just gives Wilson more attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-15-09 07:39 PM Response to Reply #104 |
120. Agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
108. Bashes! Incinerates! Demolishes! Pulverizes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
114. "it just becomes a big circus"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
116. Gee golly, Obama's such a nice guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC