Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED: Bernanke declares recession over

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:04 AM
Original message
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED: Bernanke declares recession over
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 11:12 AM by Statistical
Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke said Tuesday that the recession has ended -- at least based on the numbers.

"From a technical point , the recession is very likely over at this point," Bernanke told a conference at the Brookings Institution.

But Bernanke said there is a "risk" that labor markets will remain weak through 2010 because growth will be too anemic to create jobs. Bernanke noted that many economists now expect the labor market to recover slowly. But he said this was only a forecast and might be wrong. Bernanke also expressed confidence that Congress would complete work on new rules for Wall Street.

...

Since the August remarks, Bernanke was reappointed by President Obama to a second four-year term at the helm of the central bank

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bernanke-declares-the-recession-over-2009-09-15

I say declare 9/15 National Recovery Day, R-Day! With day off with pay for those who are employed and a bonus day's worth of unemployment for the 16% who are not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good. Now all the people I know that are unemployed can
get back to work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hip Hip Hooray. Happy R-Day (recovery) for everyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Maybe so
Why not?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. One more declaration that the recession is over
How many times can a recession be over anyway? Actually, he said "very likely over." In other words, he knows we are in deep crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. yeah, but it will be a jobless recovery going forward
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. "From a technical point , the recession is very likely over at this point,"...
I'm having trouble appreciating the mockery and outrage of this statement.

But then again, I don't put words into it that aren't there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Agreed
I find it ironic that a member named 'Statistical' doesn't understand that the economic statistics say the recession is likely over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Well statistically a recession is 2 or more consecutive qtrs of negative growth.
The end of a recession is a qtr of positive growth. Given Q1 & Q2 were negative and Q3 hasn't even ended I just thought it funny that Bernanke was willing to jump the gun.

Are we likely going to come out of the recession in Q3 yes but I think his call is a little early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Oh cool - I didn't realize you had access to all of the information he does - wonderful to know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Where did I say that?
We know Q1 & Q2 were negative. Those are known undisputed facts.
We also know Q3 is not over yet. You can confirm that yourself by checking a calender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. It's funny because in the same sentence you said his call was early...
You made the exact same call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. It is early because..... see if you can follow.
To end a recession we need a qtr in which the GDP expands.

Q1 - GDP declined
Q2 - GDP declined
Q3 - doesn't end until Sep 30th.

So I never said the call isn't right just simply early.
Q3 hasn't ended yet, Q3 would need positive growth to end the recession.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. As a statistician presumably, presumably you are aware that many, many calls...
are made early. Often with good reason. To fairly criticize this particular call, then, you must have access to all the information he is using to make the call. Thus, I compliment the availability of a wonderful DU resource I wasn't previously aware of.

This is a good thing - a very good thing indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Not the same thing....
If you make a call that the world will end tomorrow I don't need proof that it won't to critize the call.

Rather I am criticizing the fact that you can't have the information yet to definitively know the data necessary to make the call.

US Q3 GDP numbers will not be available until late October at best, prior to that it simply is a guess.

For the record I think he is right. I have said in the past it looks like economy will turn at some point in Q3 (or Q4 at the latest

More importantly the quote was taken out of context and actually was a negative quote about the economy (see below UPDATED post).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. lol. it would be nice if they'd release the data *before* they spin it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. There are only 15 days left in Q3
Do you think it's possible that Bernanke, who has access to all the latest data (which you do not), might be looking at the numbers and know that Q3 is going to end up positive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Maybe but...
companies don't release their numbers until after the end of the qtr.
Those numbers are compiled to determine the change in the GDP.

While it may be an educated guess it is just that.

Companies are very secretive about that data. The FED has no authority to demand the numbers early (even incomplete).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Put it this way
If Q3 does turn out to be positive, are you going to admit that you were wrong, or will you insist that Bernanke just "got lucky"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. No. I never claimed he will be wrong. Personally I think Q3 will be positive.
If you want check my post history I have been saying it a long time. Q3 or Q4 goes to + GDP and likely no job growth until Q2-2010.

Believing something, or making an educated guess is not the same as the recession being over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Ok
I'm glad you cleared that up. I too believe that the recession will officially be over in Q3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for the laugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. How does he define recession?
He's obviously got some technical definition of it and feels that the economy no longer fits that definition.

A lot of it is psychological anyway, so giving out good news giving people confident can't hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I assume the same way almost everyone else does: 2 quarters negative gdp growth
If *you* change the definition, that's hardly *his* fault.

Changing the rules of the game midstream, and then clowning someone for not following them hardly seems sporting. But if that's what it takes to give people joy, rock on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. ...
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. "reappointed by President Obama to a second four-year term"
Doin' a heckuva job, Bernie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Well, at least HE has a job
While millions of Americans don't because of his reckless running of the FED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. There is a very technical definition for recession..it doesn't mean just 'bad times'
And employment levels are always lagging indicators of the economic situation (thing go bad before companies lay off workers and things get better before they hire more back). He may very well be right about the recession being over -- as long as the indicators he is using aren't revised downward later -- because employment levels aren't part of the technical definition of recession.

The key issue about identifying economic cycles is that we never know for sure that one has started until we are well into it-- they are all post-hoc measures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. The treasury said millions more foreclosures are expected
Over 400 banks might fail by the end of the year, and the deficit is expected to be more than expected. Are these lagging indicators as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. deficits certainly are lagging indicators...
government revenues lag economic growth peaks because of the same dynamic as jobs - income peaks come before revenue peaks and the same on the down side. On the bank failure issue, how many will fail is at best a guess. I find it encouraging that we're getting economic growth despite the housing market's slow turnaround.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well, isn't that special.
tell that to all the people still unemployed. I'm sure they have a vastly different opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. There's a technical definition of recession and if it's met, it's met
it has NOTHING to do with how individuals perceive their situation.

If Bernanke is saying the recession might technically be over, I'm sure he is basing that on data that shows that in a few months, about now will be identified as the time when this recession "ended" per the technical definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
20. Whew! That sucked! Ok, now, EVERBODY BACK TO WORK! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Denninger: 'He's correct.
The recession is over.

The Depression has just begun.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. UPDATED. Bernanke NEGATIVE quote totally spinned by the media.
Here is the full quote:

"From a technical perspective, the recession is very likely over at this point, <however> it's still going to feel like a very weak economy for some time because many people will still find that their job security and their employment status is not what they wish it was."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Nitpicking
From Bernanke: "employment status is not what they wish it was?".

WISH? Like we're all asking for fictional unicorn ponies? WISH?

How about what it NEEDS to be. NEEDS Bernanke, NEEDS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC