Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACORN Debunking needed.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:45 PM
Original message
ACORN Debunking needed.
Are these documents real and if so, what consequence to ACORN?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/11320897/ACORN-Illegally-Operating-in-Maryland

I received this in an email from my winger brother-inlaw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. God, who the hell cares?
Seriously, there is no sense in debating a winger. You won't change them. ACORN is their current target, they hate them with the heat of a thousand suns. So what? They will move on from ACORN to something else. I don't dignify them by giving a response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yup. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. If these docs are real
couldn't it cause ACORN more trouble?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The significance is that if they are not/were not in good standing
they cannot initiate lawsuits in MD state courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. From my understanding it is legit
What's more concerning to me is this, pardon me if it's old news I was just confronted with it a couple of days ago.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=11079244

Dunno quite what to make of it.

The repubs are seriously going after ACORN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That doesn't look good
for ACORN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. What power does that comittee have though?
It looks like it's headed by repubs, that report is only a month as far as I can tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. That is the format of the Maryland Department of Assessments
and Taxation's Certificate of Standing. I have no idea if it is valid. It is accessible online though through SDAT's website. The significance is that if they are not/were not in good standing they cannot initiate lawsuits in MD courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's what I thought. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. The ACTUAL place to look is :
http://sdatcert3.resiusa.org/UCC-Charter/CharterSearch_f.aspx

As someone who has done a lot of this sort of reseach for political purposes here in Florida at sunbiz.org, it is hardly ever so "cut and dried" as that.

Corporations and businesses lapse all the time and get replaced by other corporations that take their place with different names. The fact that there are old lapsed businesses listed that are appear to belong to ACORN doesn't necessarily mean anything at all.

That said, the document you showed the link to doesn't look legit to my eye in that it fails to cite the business license number in question or the actual addresses or corporate officers of the business in question by name. Of course, I'm neither an attorney nor am I from Maryland.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks for the link
and you make a valid point about a name change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. This is definitely true - different business names and such. In fact,
on their face these are certificates saying that ACORN (AR) and ACORN (LA) did not renew their business filings (about $300 per year) ACORN in Maryland could be a separate entity established directly in MD or operating off another ACORN corporate filing. All this is on the SDAT website linked above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC