Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can we get the basic terms correct here?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:11 PM
Original message
Can we get the basic terms correct here?!
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 09:17 PM by Jeff In Milwaukee
This is for Republicans, who denounced the rebuke to Rep. Joe Wilson as a "witch hunt."

For brain-dead Republicans (that's a redundancy if ever there was one), a "witch hunt" is when a person is persecuted for a crime that he not only did not commit, but could not have possibly committed -- as there are no such thing as witches. Sorry Wiccans, but until you can manage to turn me into a newt, there's no such thing as a witch in the generally-accepted meaning of the term.

Joe Wilson is not the victim of a Witch Hunt. First of all, he did the fucking crime, as tens of millions of people watching the speech can readily attest. And since Wilson has already apologized for what he did, even HE acknowledges that he's guilty as Cain in this matter. The offense in question is not a figment of somebody's imagination. It happened.

As to the Republican claim that Wilson did nothing that hadn't been done by Democrats during the Bush years, there's two points to make here. A) Saying that others did it too does not constitute a Witch Hunt (it's further evidence that Wilson really did do it), and B) You lying sack of crap, you. Name the Democrat who heckled Bush during any of his speeches before Congress. Name names or shut the fuck up.

So this is not a Witch Hunt. What it is, is Republicans demanding to never be held accountable for their actions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Republicans have issues with the meaning of words and the truth.
They haven't a clue what Socialist, Communist and Fascist mean; they lie blatantly about anything and everything. "Witch hunt" evokes an emotional response and places Wilson as a victim; that's all that matters. Who cares what it really means? :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm glad I don't teach Poli Sci....
They way they toss those words around would make my head explode.

But let's be clear about what they mean when the call Obama a Nazi. It has nothing to do with any generally accepted definition of the word or any historical parallels to Nazi Germany.

What the Glenn Beck's of the world are saying to their lunatic fringe followers is Obama is a Nazi, and since all Nazi's are evil, it's all right for you to kill Obama. Make no doubt about it -- in the fetid swamp that is the collective psyche of the right wing, assassinating this President is an act of patriotism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't care what it is. The GOP needs to be taught respect.
We need to do this kind of thing more often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's racism
Kanye is rude for interrupting Taylor Swift (at a fucking who-the-fuck-cares awards show), but Addison Wison can interrupt the president.

Rude is rude, no matter who does it. So, either people are allowed to interrupt as they please and without regard to rules (ala Wilson) or there is an expectation of civil behavior and those that break it are reprimanded as appropriate (ala Kanye).

You're right, no one heckled Bush even when he was lying. Not only is it rude, it's against House rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. jeff, here's where you made your first mistake...
Edited on Tue Sep-15-09 09:33 PM by orleans
in the line: "person is persecuted for a crime that he not only did not commit"

in *should* have said: "person is persecuted for a crime that he not only did not commit"

...if you're going to spell it out for those morans--you really have to spell it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC