Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-16-09 12:43 PM
Original message |
Let's call Congress now! Turn the Baucus bill in to a starting point for negotation. |
|
It is the establishment bargaining position. Let's turn it into the starting point. And no one gets held to the starting point. They need to move our direction.
|
mikelgb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-16-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message |
1. unintended K intended U |
|
Fuck Max Baucus and his bill
call your congressman (RIGHT FUCKING NOW) and tell them to co-sponsor HR676 Let's use that as the starting point.
k thx
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-16-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I think we are saying essentially the same thing. |
|
I just want us to let them know that we don't consider this Baucus bill to be the end point.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-16-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
3. What about the Kennedy Bill instead? |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-16-09 12:52 PM by emulatorloo
Baucus's BS bill is not the only game in town.
ON EDIT -- I do indeed get what you are saying.
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-16-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The only starting point that crap bill should be is to tear it up & Medicare for all |
|
Its obvious after this that the piecemeal approach is too easily corrupted by the special interests in DC.
Use this as a template for what NOT to do and bypass those special interests by proposing a single payer system.
|
cliffordu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-16-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
Vincardog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-16-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
6. OK as long as Our STarting Point is Universal Single Payer paid for by the end of Dim Son's tax cuts |
|
and we include making the Parasitic Insurance companies abide by the anti-trust laws.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:01 AM
Response to Original message |