Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canadian Parliament introduces bill to allow US war resisters to seek asylum in Canada -AP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:01 PM
Original message
Canadian Parliament introduces bill to allow US war resisters to seek asylum in Canada -AP
Bravo for Canada and the resisters!

http://www.startribune.com/world/59679112.html

TORONTO - Canadian Parliament will consider a bill introduced Thursday that would allow American and other war resisters to stay in Canada.

The bill, introduced by the Liberal Party's Gerard Kennedy, would allow other countries' military deserters to stay in Canada if their refusal to serve is based on sincere moral, political or religious objections.

Parliament has already voted twice to support war resisters, but those were non-binding motions.Kennedy's bill would be binding because it would amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

Most war resisters in Canada are U.S. military personnel who have refused to participate in the Iraq War on the grounds that it's illegal and immoral. There are thought to be about 200 American military deserters who have come to Canada to avoid service in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortunately, private member's bills usually have a snowball's chance
On the other hand, Parliament's pretty erratic right now, so who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:03 PM
Original message
Here's hoping it passes.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Any chance of it passing?

Kiucinich has some good bills that never see the floor; is this MP just a canadian version of Rep Kiucinich?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think they still need to be choosy. A new regular military enlistee knows
what they're signing up for. A backdoor draft or National Guard re-appropriation - those guys should be able to say no, ESPECIALLY national guard, since that charter is notably different than regular military in an offensive or occupational foreign action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. What about Afghan operations?
This would be a sticky point, being that Canada has its own mission there.

I wonder what its chances of passing actually are. Probably little right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wish they had it
during The Reign of the Chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. If we have an election, and get a Liberal majority,
the bill will pass then with no problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Isn't a liberal majority pretty much fantasy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC