Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The CIA post 2009 Life Expectancy Est for 2009 - Take That Albania!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 10:39 PM
Original message
The CIA post 2009 Life Expectancy Est for 2009 - Take That Albania!
Edited on Fri Sep-18-09 10:50 PM by rpannier
Yep. According to the CIA World Fact Book if you live in the USA your life expectancy is estimated to be 78.11 years which makes the US number 50 in the world (actually it's 49 -- since for some bizarre reason they've chosen to list the European Union in their survey, while listing each individual nation separately as well.)

While it is true the life expectancy in the US is behind you lesser nations ( :sarcasm: ) like Ireland (47), Denmark (46), South Korea (40) , Finland (37), the United Kingdom (36), Belgium (33) , Norway (24), Sweden (10), France (9), Canada (8), Australia (7), Hong Kong (6), San Marino (5), Singapore (4) , Japan (3), Andorra (2) and Macau (1)

The US is ahead of nations like Albania (51), Kuwait (53), Costa Rica (54), Slovenia (60), Uruguay, Mexico, The Turks and Caicos Islands, The West Bank, China, Vietnam, Sudan and Swaziland.

Now...Aren't we all proud?

The difference between 1 and 50 is about six years 84.26 and 78.11
23 countries have a life expectancy of over 80 years
In 1999, the US had a longer life expectancy than Denmark, South Korea, Bosnia and Ireland.


link:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2102rank.html


edited to add number 6 Hong Kong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fucking Albanians, man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'll say it:
It's a diet based on crap and a complete inattention to preventive care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Agreed
Australia is 7th and Australians drink heavily and eat a lot of crappy food, but they do see their doctors, the do get out and are a rather active society.

Koreans and Japanese smoke rather heavily, but again they get annual check-ups, they have good diets, etc

The US eats crappy food, doesn't exercise and doesn't see a doctor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. My friends who have been to Australia
say that NOBODY is fat there.

Meanwhile, Shasta county has a 56% obesity rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I've been to Australia
I work with Australians here in Korea

They eat crappy food
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. But are they skinny?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Skinny...No
Edited on Fri Sep-18-09 11:13 PM by rpannier
Athletic...Yes

They look like Footie players -- the men, not the women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Macau,
the most densely populated country in the world, is numero uno? I find that very surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I was surprised about Hong Kong too
But I've seen them near the top on all life expectancy charts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Actually, Macau's not a country. It's a special administrative region of China, and
before that was a colony of Portugal.

It's a bit worrisome that the CIA couldn't get that one right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. In essence
Macau and Hong Kong, the 2 so called Special Administrative Regions are de facto countries, as their population size, life expectancy, GDP, government systems, economic systems, currency etc are independent and different of the larger PRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. My 83 yr old mother will get a kick out of this
her sister is 96 and still goes to the casinos.

and they are both large women.

something in the genes maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Louisiana1976 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Did you know that the life expectancy of New Orleans' African-Americans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. That's the other point I was going to make upthread
If half of the country has a life expectancy of 88, and the other half has a life expectancy of 68, then viola: 78.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Only possible
in the greatest country in the world :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-18-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. we are number 18th
Go New Zealand!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. We're number 9
Here in France.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
18. Not sure I want to know how much influence infant mortality has on those figures. n/t
Perhaps that might be a good question for the Pro-Fetus Wingnuts. "Sorry kid, once you're out of the womb, you're on your own."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
19. Look at the list without the city-states and principalities.
Edited on Sat Sep-19-09 10:37 AM by JackRiddler
Macau covers 1/6 the area of Washington DC and has 550,000 people in it. San Marino is like 1/3 of Washington DC and has a population of 30,000! Andorra has 80,000. Imagine the "Upper East Side" of Manhattan (richest zipcodes in the USA) were a country. It would have an astonishing life expectancy.

Most of the top 30 are like that, micro-principalities and city-states. Some are mainly tax havens where rich people pretend to live, like Monaco and the Caymans.

So the "real" number 1 is Japan, which is incredible given that it's also in the top 5 for population worldwide, followed by Australia, Canada and France.

Here's the list minus the mini-countries. That is, roughly speaking. I suppose we should allow Hong Kong with its 7 million people and Singapore with 4.6 million. But both are not and could never be their own ecological systems, both depend on food and resources from countrysides not included in their borders. It's as though we separated a few rich cities from a large country and praised them for their long life-spans as though this would be possible if these cities were not effectively exploiting the rest of that country. You might make the same case for Japan, which sustains a very high and dense population in a small area by importing grain: in effect, they buy their long lifespans by being very rich.

(1) Japan 82.12

(Singapore 81.98) - city-state

(Hong Kong 81.86) - city-state

(2) Australia 81.63

(3) Canada 81.23

(4) France 80.98

(5) Sweden 80.86

(6) Switzerland 80.85

(7) Israel 80.73

(Iceland 80.67) - pop. 300,000

(8) New Zealand 80.36

(9) Italy 80.20

(10) Spain 80.05

(11) Norway 79.95

(12) Greece 79.66

I shall now totally unfairly assign the above to the following categories:

- blessed by nature and prevalent cuisine: the Mediterranean countries (4)
- blessed by low population on huge area with resources: Australia.
- rich mothers who buy it, but have decent welfare systems too: Japan, Switzerland.
- rich, but have their shit together systemically: France, Canada, Sweden, Norway
- city-states appearing adavantaged by being considered in isolation from their countrysides: Singapore, Hong Kong (add them to "rich mothers who buy it").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC