Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Texas group ((Innocence Project) derides scent IDs as junk science

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 12:32 AM
Original message
AP: Texas group ((Innocence Project) derides scent IDs as junk science
By JEFF CARLTON (AP) – 4 hours ago

DALLAS — The Innocence Project of Texas said Friday that scent identification lineups, in which trained dogs determine if a suspect's smell matches the smell of crime scene evidence, are based on faulty science and have led to a number of wrongful convictions.

The group, which tries to free the wrongly convicted, said it will release a report next week detailing at least five cases in which innocent people were arrested following scent ID lineups conducted by a Fort Bend sheriff's deputy who trains dogs. Two of the five were jailed for capital murder before the charges against them were dropped.

<snip>

Trained dogs are routinely at border checkpoints and airports to smell for drugs, bombs or other contraband. They're used by search and rescue teams and in other police work, such as to chase suspects.

But what Pikett does amounts to "dog whispering," the innocence group said.

"This is exactly the kind of down-home voodoo that jurors like because, hey, everybody likes a dog," said Jeff Blackburn, chief counsel for the Innocence Project of Texas. "Why don't they just have a guy who says he has a unicorn that can figure out who criminals are?"

Read more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting story...
Doesn't surprise me at all. They are known for their meticulous, hard-headed scientific investigations.

I used to know a guy whose good friend was freed after this group proved that he had not done the crime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Say what now?
I don't know what dogs would have to do with convictions.

Probable cause for an arrest, sure. But not convictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Junk science is funny until someone gets killed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here, Lassie! Come on, girl. Who violated Rule 10b-5 of the SEC regs, girl?!
All police dogs have to be "read" by their handler, and the dog can read the handler's reactions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Little Timmy fell down the well again, Lassie! Tell us who pushed him!"
:rofl: :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. FURY was even better than Lassie, cuz Fury was a horse!
In the 1950s, before he was on Mission Impossible, actor Peter Graves was the Uncle or Dad (I forget which) of a kid named JOEY, who had a horse named FURY.

Oh, that Fury! Every week he'd understand thing like "go get Pete, Fury!"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC