From the Time article:
As melodrama, it's thumping good stuff. But as politics, it's sort of a train wreck — at once powerful, spellbinding and uncontrolled. Like William Jennings Bryan whipping up populist Democrats over moneyed interests or the John Birch Society brooding over fluoride, Beck mines the timeless theme of the corrupt Them thwarting a virtuous Us. This flexible narrative often contains genuinely uncomfortable truths. Some days "they" are the unconfirmed policy "czars" whom Beck fears Obama is using to subvert constitutional government — and he has some radical-sounding sound bites to back it up. Some days "they" are the network of leftist community organizers known as ACORN — and his indictment of the group is looking stronger every day. But he also spins yarns of less substance. He tells his viewers that Obama's volunteerism efforts are really an attempt to create a "civilian national-security force that is just as strong, just as powerful as the military." While scourging Obama and the Democratic Congress, Beck takes pains to say that the ranks of the nation's would-be oppressors know no party.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1924348-3,00.html------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From a critique of the author:
Time Magazine Loves Glenn Beck (Again)
Posted by Charles Kaiser on Friday, September 18, 2009
You see, even though Von Drehle’s piece was–ostensibly–a profile of a media figure–von Drehele is not interested in writing “media journalism,” the kind in which you actually try to evaulate the person you’re writing about.
Von Drehle’s total lack of interest in actual facts is briskly displayed in the very first paragraph of his profile, describing the tea party in Washington last weekend, which was largely the result of Beck’s six-month-long on-air organizing effort for what he called his “9/12 project.”
“If you get your information from liberal sources, the crowd numbered about 70,000, many of them greedy racists,” Von Drehle wrote. “If you get your information from conservative sources, the crowd was hundreds of thousands strong, perhaps as many as a million, and the tenor was peaceful and patriotic.”
Members of the Washington, D.C., Fire Department will no doubt be delighted to be identified as a “liberal source,” since they originated the crowd estimate of 70,000 people. As for the higher crowd estimates, the biggest one, of 1.2 million, was simply invented by Matt Kibbe, president of Freedom Works, one of the protest’s main organizers. Kibbe announced from the stage that ABC News had reported the 1.2 million figure. This led to an e-mail to news outlets from ABC, very shortly thereafter, pointing out that the network had never done any such thing–but instead had relied on those “liberal” firemen who offered the lower 60,000 to 70,000 figure. But you would never know any of that from reading Time.
http://www.hillmanfoundation.org/blog/time-magazine-loves-glenn-beck-again