|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 02:42 PM Original message |
Wrap your head around this: A Red-State Judge is forcing a Gay couple to stay married... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. Indiana's a blue state, now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
el_bryanto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Yeah but we can still hate the South right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sentelle (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. well after all, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NCDem60 (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. Classic catch 22 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aragorn (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. This is an old movie plot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuvNewcastle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. I wonder why they even went to court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. But without a divorce, neither of them can again get married in a jurisdiction which permits it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuvNewcastle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I didn't think about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. Helllloooo Judge? Full faith and credit clause??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Blocked, I think by DOMA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Not clear - I think that Loving v. Va, 1967 will be critical in this case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-21-09 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
12. Full faith and credit clause - this will be a SCOTUS case. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC