At Pentagon's Request, Post Delayed Story on General's Afghanistan Report

[bigtree]

from Howard Kurtz at WaPo: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/22/AR2009092203341_pf.html

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

To Bob Woodward, it was the modern-day equivalent of the Pentagon Papers. But to Obama administration officials, the classified assessment of the deteriorating situation in Afghanistan, if disclosed by The Washington Post, represented a potential threat to the safety of U.S. troops.

The result was that The Post agreed to a one-day delay in publicizing the report by Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, and that the paper's top editor engaged in a lengthy discussion Sunday with three top Defense Department officials in a meeting at the Pentagon. The Post published the report, which Woodward had obtained, on Monday.

Woodward said in an interview Tuesday that four White House and administration officials strongly objected to the publication of the full report, telling him, Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli and a Post lawyer in a conference call on Saturday that "if we publish it as is, it could endanger the lives of troops."

After the Pentagon meeting Sunday with Brauchli, Woodward and Post reporter Rajiv Chandrasekaran, administration officials "did a wholesale declassification of 98 percent" of the document, Woodward said, while The Post agreed to withhold certain operational details. That, Woodward said, "made it easier" for the newspaper to proceed with publication without risking criticism for disclosing classified information.

Brauchli declined to comment. Post spokeswoman Kris Coratti said the paper "agreed to redact certain material from the document. . . . The Pentagon then produced a version of the document with the agreed redactions and released it back to us declassified. We posted that version online, after confirming its accuracy."

read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/22/AR2009092203341.html

[bertman]

1. . . . "if we publish it as is, it could endanger the lives of troops." That is the most worn-out

excuse for keeping information secret, since the invention of the printing press. You'd think the Obama administration could come up with a better one than that.

[SammyWinstonJack]

3. +1 nt

[msongs]

2. military commander stupidity endangers lives of troops but they still get paid nt