Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deaths from Marijuana v. 17 FDA-Approved Drugs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:16 AM
Original message
Deaths from Marijuana v. 17 FDA-Approved Drugs
Much of the medical marijuana discussion has focused on the safety of marijuana compared to the safety of FDA-approved drugs. On June 24, 2005 ProCon.org sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to find the number of deaths caused by marijuana compared to the number of deaths caused by 17 FDA-approved drugs. Twelve of these FDA-approved drugs were chosen because they are commonly prescribed in place of medical marijuana, while the remaining five FDA-approved drugs were randomly selected because they are widely used and recognized by the general public.

We chose Jan. 1, 1997 as our starting date as it is the beginning of the first year following the Nov. 1996 approval of the first state medical marijuana laws (such as California's Proposition 215). The FDA reports we read from Sep. 13, 2005 to Oct. 14, 2005 included drug deaths "to present", which was the date each report was compiled for our request. We cut off the counting as of June 30, 2005 to provide a uniform end-date to the various reports.

On Aug. 25, 2005 the FDA sent us 12 CDs and five printed reports containing copies of their Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) report on each drug requested. These reports included all adverse events reported to the FDA, only a portion of which included deaths. We manually counted the number of deaths reported on each drug from the FDA-supplied information.

A review of the FDA Adverse Events reports also revealed some deaths where marijuana was at least a concomitant drug (a drug also used at the time of death) in some cases. On Oct. 14, 2005 we used the Freedom of Information Act to request a copy of the adverse events reported deaths for marijuana/cannabis. We received those reports on Aug. 3, 2006 in the form of three additional CDs.

http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/viewresource.asp?resourceID=000145#drugdeathchart


It's time to legalize this very effective, yet harmless, plant for medicinal purposes.

Peace,

Ghost

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. What are your thoughts
on the link of marijuana use and schizophrenia in users?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. There's a closer link between schizophrenia and toxoplasmosis.
Nobody's talking about making cats illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subcomhd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Nobody? You've never met my dog. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. Actually, schizophrenia is most closely linked with father's age at conception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. There is no such link.
Although there are certainly some schizophrenics who smoke pot, there are also millions of non-schizophrenics who smoke pot.

Everyone who smokes pot eventually dies, but that doesn't mean pot caused the death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. There is a link.
I'll provide info later. I have to head off to an appointment now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Pot Use Doesn’t Exacerbate Symptoms Of Schizophrenia, Study Says
London, United Kingdom: Marijuana use is not associated with heightened symptoms of schizophrenia, according to data to be published in the journal Schizophrenia Research.

Investigators at London’s Institute of Psychiatry assessed whether the prior use of cannabis in patients with schizophrenia was associated with appreciable changes in schizophrenic symptoms compared with patients who had no history of marijuana use. Researchers performed logistic regression analysis on 757 volunteers with cases of first onset schizophrenia. Of these, 182 (24 percent) had reportedly used cannabis in the year prior to diagnosis, while 552 (73 percent) had not. (The remaining three percent had no data available.)

Investigators reported no statistically significant "differences in syptomatology between schizophrenic patients who were or were not cannabis users" after controlling for patients’ age, sex, and ethnicity.

Researchers also failed to find "any evidence that cannabis users with schizophrenia were more likely to have a family member with the disorder."

These findings "argue against a distinct schizophrenic-like psychosis caused by cannabis," authors concluded.

The study is the largest trial ever conducted to compare cannabis using and non-using schizophrenic patients, investigators said.

More: http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7253
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. This study is
about people who were already schizophrenic. The data shown me by a psychologist was about normal people being more likely to become schizophrenic. He had some nifty pictures of the brain. I'll see if I can find them on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I haven't read enough on that subject to have an informed opinion about it..
I do know, from personal experience, that some people become very paranoid while using marijuana. I also knew some people who became very paranoid while using cocaine. That's a risk that you run into with *any* drug, imho...

As for myself, the only time I've ever had suicidal thoughts was while I was on anti-depressants... go figure, huh? And they say that is usually only common in teens/yound adults. I'm 46 and just experienced this earlier this year when my ortho gave me amitryptiline for pain.

Peace,

Ghost

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Debunked
by researchers in the Netherlands and New Zealand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Here is my thoughts on it
I've read several of the studies.

The gist seems to be that if you are going to develop schizophrenia smoking pot may bring it on at an earlier age.

That this link needs more study to find out if it is actually true, or whether people who are going to develop schizophrenia are simply more likely to smoke pot.

Correlation has been seen in other words, but not causality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. My thoughts are, I know someone who is a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic
whose psychiatrist recommends the individual keep using it if s/he feels it helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. dupe. n/t
Edited on Thu Sep-24-09 12:37 AM by girl gone mad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting




But what can you say? Fact have a well-known liberal bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. I know one of the FDA-approved deaths.
Death by Oxycontin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just more factual fuel for us to use in the fight to legalize.
Edited on Wed Sep-23-09 11:31 AM by rd_kent
Proves again, what most claim, pot has NEVER killed anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Totals
Edited on Wed Sep-23-09 12:26 PM by Uncle Joe
•TOTAL DEATHS FROM MARIJUANA

Primary suspect / Secondary suspect (contributing) / Total

0 / 279 / 279


•TOTAL DEATHS FROM 17 FDA-APPROVED DRUGS

Primary suspect / Secondary suspect (contributing) / Total

10,008 / 1,679 / 11,687


Thanks for the thread, Ghost in the Machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Pot isn't illegal because it's harmful. It's illegal because it ain't.
Hence its widespread use. It's merely an excuse for an erosion of basic civil rights. That's why I'm not optimistic. Obama's DEA continues to raid dispensaries, for example. It's not because the President believes marijuana to be harmful--it's that the boys with guns demand something to shoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Two points.
Secondary needs more explanation than "at least a concomitant drug in some cases."
Would this mean that someone who had a blood alcohol level of 0.5 and a trace amount of marijuana at time of death is listed as secondary?

The Vioxx deaths look to be lowballed by the FDA:

Death's Due To Vioxx
Dr. Graham also told the Senate Finance Committee that Vioxx may have caused 55,000 deaths alone, more than the 28,000 projected by the FDA. Graham also indicated Vioxx may have caused as many as 160,000 heart attacks, strokes and deaths, combined.

The US Food and Drug Administration denied charges it tried to suppress a safety official's findings that painkiller Vioxx, which was pulled from the market last week, raised heart attack risks.

Dr. David Graham's study on the Merck & Co Inc. arthritis drug was sent through the "standard review process" before being made public in August, the FDA said in a statement released late Thursday.

Graham told Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley on Thursday that FDA officials pressured him to keep quiet or water down his conclusions about Vioxx, according to Grassley.

http://www.4-men.org/mens-health/vioxx-recall.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Abuse of statistics
Totals are worthless comparison. What would be valid would be comparison of the rates of deaths - how many died divided by how many took each medicine. For example - 25 people died in Class V white water rafting accidents while 50,000 people died in traffic accidents so white water rafting is much, much safer than driving to the grocery store.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The question is why haven't we seen these numbers?
And IMO the answer is, the pharmaceutical industry doesn't want us to know how many people are hooked on their chemicals.

We DO know how many millions of people have smoked pot.

If I had to guess I'd say the numbers are about equal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R for truth.
Reich-wing/corporate noise aside, the continued prohibition of a plant, the billion$ it costs and the thousands of families it destroys every year, is a crime against humanity.

But it's us committing it, so we will pretend it is "debatable".
:grr:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. My only worries are if they legalize it will they add poisonous
stuff to it and or water it down. And would it just end up some big huge corp like all the other crappy ones that rip off the little guy???

Maybe they should just make it legal to grow up to 5 plants in your own home. Pure, simple, no problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Yes...or poison it to kill us quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. Shameless kick... (steal these graphics)







I made these, feel free to snag them...


Peace,

Ghost

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
25. I think it should be legalized, but I don't believe it's completely harmless when
used to excess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
26. Our friend is 91 and now on Medical MJ
It was prescribed for him at Kaiser Hospital as a "last chance before he would waste away."

He had lost 20 lbs, would not eat and has Alzheimer's.

That was about 8 months ago.

He is not perfect but he is able to function.

He attended my Mom's(that is his girlfriend) 91st Birthday party a few weeks ago and he was able to enjoy it. He has gained weight and eats now.

His family believes the Medical MJ is working!

Another thing -- my Mom has Alzheimer's and they gave her all the Pharma Delights for that problem.

She went into depression with one of those drugs -- started going into her room, shutting the door and crying.

The 2nd drug, she had chills running through her body at night and could not sleep.


How I wish I could get Medical MJ to just calm her down and make it possible for her to have a good night's sleep.

PS/ I came home to live with my Mom 9 years ago -- when I got here she was taking 11 Pills a day.

I kept asking the doctors ~ " What is this pill really for and why does she need to take it?"

Guess what? That was 9 years ago. For the last 7 years, she has been on 1 pill a day for her Blood Pressure and one for her Diabetes.

Now if I could get her Medical MJ to help her relax a bit, that may help her but to my knowledge, in California, it must be a severe situation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
27. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. I have yet to hear legitimate arguments in favor of cannabis prohibition.
Just as no one has been able to explain to me why we trust an 18 year old to fight and possibly die for his country, but not to enjoy a cold beer when he comes home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC