The Patriot Act - promise versus reality

[kristopher]

DoJ Official Blows Cover Off PATRIOT Act


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/23/watch-doj-official-blows_n_296209.html
In the debate over the PATRIOT Act, the Bush White House insisted it needed the authority to search people's homes without their permission or knowledge so that terrorists wouldn't be tipped off that they're under investigation.

Now that the authority is law, how has the Department of Justice used the new power? To go after drug dealers.

Only three of the 763 "sneak-and-peek" requests in fiscal year 2008 involved terrorism cases, according to a July 2009 report from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. Sixty-five percent were drug cases.

Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) quizzed Assistant Attorney General David Kris about the discrepancy at a hearing on the PATRIOT Act Wednesday. One might expect Kris to argue that there is a connection between drug trafficking and terrorism or that the administration is otherwise justified to use the authority by virtue of some other connection to terrorism.

He didn't even try. "This authority


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/23/watch-doj-official-blows_n_296209.html

[leftstreet]

1. His full quote:

"This authority here on the sneak-and-peek side, on the criminal side, is not meant for intelligence. It's for criminal cases. So I guess it's not surprising to me that it applies in drug cases," Kris said.

K&R

[kristopher]

2. Thanks for the kick but

Quotes from articles are limited to 4 paragraphs for a valid reason; the original author deserves patronage.

[leftstreet]

3. good point

I edited down to just his quote

(not awake yet)

Hope everyone reads the whole article.

[OnyxCollie]

4. K&R. nt