Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Conyers-Bybee Love Story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 12:15 PM
Original message
The Conyers-Bybee Love Story
There is strong evidence that John Conyers, Patrick Leahy, and most of the rest of us are in love with torture-lawyer Jay Bybee. I'm not talking about sexual love and wouldn't, because people's lives are lost to such bread-and-circuses journalism every day. I'm talking deep personal devotion.

Let's examine the evidence.

1. As head of the Office of Legal Counsel, Jay Bybee committed felonies in exchange for being nominated to a life-time seat on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Bybee violated the Anti-Torture Statute and the War Crimes Statute by facilitating torture through secret memos purporting to legalize specific criminal acts. Bybee also played a leading role in a conspiracy to violate the UN Charter, the US Constitution, and the War Powers Act by signing a secret memo purporting to give presidents the unrestricted power to launch aggressive wars.

2. The excuses that House Judiciary Committee Chairman Conyers used for not impeaching Bush or Cheney, outlandish and revolting as they may have been, do not apply to a judge who is not president and who is not known to most Americans. Yet Conyers, his committee, and the House of Representatives impeached a judge this year for groping people and have not attempted to impeach Bybee.

3. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy has asked Bybee to testify, and Bybee has told the Chairman to go cheney himself. Conyers has not even asked Bybee to appear. Although any committee of Congress has the power to subpoena and to use the Capitol Police to enforce that subpoena, neither Leahy nor Conyers has subpoenaed Bybee.

4. While more than enough of Bybee's handiwork is publicly available in the form of his death memos, Conyers and Leahy have expressed their intention to do nothing until the Justice Department itself releases its own internal report on the crimes of Bybee and his colleagues. This has resulted in the Justice Department not releasing its report.

5. Conyers and Leahy are not being challenged in this matter by any members of Congress or any activist groups, the whole gang of them and us -- each in our own way -- deferring to the preference of President Barack Obama to grant all of the worst criminals immunity. But this dynamic won't stop people from placing the blame on Conyers. He knows that Obama is the messiah, whereas he is just the guy with the responsibility to impeach. Conyers wouldn't shred what's left of his oath of office and reputation just to please Obama. Conyers has publicly denounced Obama's actions on healthcare in the strongest terms.

6. The Department of Justice has proposed to cement in place the power of presidents to tell lawyers to secretly legalize crimes for particular criminals, by investigating for prosecution those who strayed from the illegal policies and granting immunity to those who created them.

7. The consequences of allowing the so-called executive branch to grant itself immunity for its crimes will effectively eliminate the first branch of government from our government, and Leahy and Conyers belong to that branch. The consequences of leaving Bybee in his current office include the possibility of his ruling on the legality of many of Bush and Cheney's crimes.

8. I've only heard two excuses leak out of Conyers' office. One of them is that the media would attack him for targeting a "conservative" judge if he tried to impeach a judge who tried to legalize aggressive war and torture. Exactly what is conservative about such actions has not been explained. How our republic can survive if Congress continues to take orders from Fox News I'm not sure.

9. The other excuse I've heard is that Bybee's not the worst of the lot, that John Yoo was a worse lawyer, that Bush and Cheney gave the orders. The problem with impeaching those people, however, is that they are out of office. You could and should still impeach them. Going into last year's election, Conyers promised to impeach Bush after it. Impeaching Bush and Cheney now would send a strong message, expose new information, lay the groundwork for prosecutions, and strip away secret service and pensions while banning them from every again holding public office. I'm all for it, and only focus elsewhere because 98 percent of Americans don't know it's possible. But if you're intent on avoiding impeachments of conservatives or non-sexual criminals, what about subpoenas? Subpoena the lot of them. Start with whoever you deem the most significant. Talking this way to Conyers is like talking to a wall. Why?

10. Many have suggested that Conyers is being blackmailed over scandals involving his wife and other things. But to allow threats to himself to dissuade him from the essential task of preserving the legislative branch of our government would require that he hate his country. I find it easier to imagine that he loves something or someone else.

Since the beginning of the year, already on record supporting Bybee's impeachment or resignation are: Congressman Jerrold Nadler, Senator Russ Feingold, the New York Times, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the Courage Campaign, Progressive Democrats of America, Bruce Fein, Common Cause, Democrats.com, People for the American Way, The World Can't Wait, ThinkProgress, Crooks and Liars, Digby, Scott Horton, After Downing Street, ImpeachBybee.org, Jeremy Scahill, Dave Lindorff, Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, Senator Patrick Leahy, American Freedom Campaign, National Lawyers Guild, John Podesta, MoveOn, Veterans for Peace, National Accountability Network, Code Pink, Velvet Revolution, Bruce Ackerman, the Salt Lake Tribune, and too many others to name. But all have gone silent.

Efforts to impeach Bybee are headquartered at http://ImpeachBybee.org I'm convinced it’s a cause worth imposing on Congress, not just politely asking for. I'm convinced that the restoration of the power of impeachment as a check on the executive branch is much larger than Bybee, and that his impeachment hearings would result in the incarceration of the heads of his crime family: Cheney and Bush. I'm convinced that this is a cause worth pursuing, even if we have to break off a love affair.

David Swanson is the author of the new book "Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union" by Seven Stories Press. You can order it and find out when tour will be in your town: http://davidswanson.org/book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Umbral Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I assumed the reason the Bybee story disappeared had more to do with Harry Reid.
For any number of reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow David, what a title for a thread.
Edited on Thu Sep-24-09 01:55 PM by mmonk
But I'm with you on this one. How many times does the Constitution mention impeachment? Enough times for them to have meant it and to not run around it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. But all have gone silent.
Could it partly be this?


http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/09/06/van-jones-a-moment-of-truth-for-liberal-institutions-in-the-veal-pen/

A few weeks ago, Rahm Emanuel showed up at a Common Purpose meeting and called these liberal groups "fucking stupid" for going after Blue Dogs on health care and ordered them not to do so any more. Since that time, to the best of my knowledge, none of them have.



Sorry, Rahm, I'm not "fucking stupid".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. r u suggesting that
"stupid" is Bybee's code name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R. Add me to the millions longing for impeachment.
I agree that impeachment of these criminals would be valuable for our country.

I also think that while initial attempts to proceed with impeachment would rile up Republican ire, once the proceedings got underway and exposed their wide-ranging malfeasance, they would be very helpful in curbing Republican arrogance and war-mongering.

Our country needs to make significant changes in many areas and I hope the shock of impeachment trials would help wake our fellow citizens up to how far we have strayed from our ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks, David Swanson. Let's keep the pressure on the administration
to investigate and if appropriate prosecute these crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. No
Let's put the pressure on Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. No. This is not a matter for Congress.
Edited on Thu Sep-24-09 10:58 PM by JDPriestly
The courts have to decide whether torture is a crime that can be punished. The laws on the books have no meaning unless they are enforced by the courts.

I think that we have to have investigations and prosecutions by the Justice Department before Bybee can be impeached successfully.

Congress could hold hearings, but it probably won't impeach Bybee until the courts establish that the torture is a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. I feel something, not love exactly, more like . ahh... hatred, repulsion, disgust...
that it isn't going to happen.

But some friends of mine are lawyers, and several have said
point blank, that they would object, move to recuse, and otherwise would
not willingly proceed with a case with Bybee as the judge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Who could imagine that John Conyers hates his country? Not I. Why do you say
he would have to HATE his country if he allowed threats to himself to dissuade him from preserving the legislative branch of government? Maybe he fears for the safety of others he loves. Obviously there is something that has put him off track in his pursuit of justice and accountability.

Maybe he has too many wounds that ache from previous battles. Maybe he's just gotten too old to do the job. It's a verifiable fact that the most active and undaunted agents of change in a military takeover are the colonels. They're the younger, more energetic, more zealous, and more impulsive officers who have that certain consequences-be-damned attitude that it takes to lead a coup or depose a higher-ranking officer. I think we need a "colonel" to take over the Chairman's seat.

Thank you for the link to the Impeach Bybee site. I hope we'll get a strong response from DU'ers.

As always, your exhortations for us to retake the powers the Legislative Branch has given away to the Executive Branch are inspiring even if the task seems so daunting.

Recommend.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. his age could be a factor
but he does do other things
and he has a whole committee of younger people
and i still think he'd have to hate his country even to allow a threat to a loved one to dissuade him from saving the republic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC