Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Medical Exile" - A CBC interview with a woman who can't return to the US ( Podcast)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:38 PM
Original message
"Medical Exile" - A CBC interview with a woman who can't return to the US ( Podcast)
Kathleen Kelly is an American who married a Canadian and now lives on Bowen Island in British Columbia with her husband and six-year-old son. The thing is, she'd really like to go back home to California. But her son has a rare health condition ... a "pre-existing condition" that would keep her from getting health insurance. So, like many other Americans, she's a "health care exile."

http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/current_20090925_20739.mp3

This is a heartbreaking story. Her son had reached his health insurance lifetime cap - at 8 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. My son married a canadian and they can't move back here because
she has a medical condition where she has to go to an emergency room every so often because of this allergy thing. It's free when she visits in Canada but they would be in debt the rest of their lives if they moved here and had to visit the ER even twice. I miss him :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Believe it or not
some employers DO provide health insurance that immediately covers any and all pre-existing conditions.

It's not impossible to find one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Only NEXT-to-impossible....
Edited on Sat Sep-26-09 06:53 PM by BrklynLiberal
and what about the premium for such "insurance"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not really
I work for a large media corporation. They're not hard to find at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:54 PM
Original message
That makes sense seeing that jobs are so easy to come by nowadays..
especially ones with outstanding benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Ah, now we know why the MSM pimps for private insurers. They are bribed
Edited on Sat Sep-26-09 07:33 PM by McCamy Taylor
with affordable policies for their employees.

In Fort Worth many years ago a local HMO was violating Texas state law, but the only Fort Worth newspaper would not report on it....because the HMO provided their health insurance.

Thanks for the info. I had been wondering if the privates are giving the corporate media a sweetheart deal in exchange for propaganda. Now I know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thank you - he's not exactly the most employable type so I wouldn't
want them to bank on the possibility of finding an employer with health insurance only to be fired, let go, etc., and be unable to make Cobra payments. He has told me that as long as the insurance situation in this country is like this, they can't take the change.

However, when he goes to a clinic or hospital - it's really cheap....and he never has to wait in lines ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. But you're still out the money for overpriced premiums and those ER visits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not really
My co-pay at the ER is $75 or nothing if I'm admitted. And my share is approx $60 month and employer pays the rest.

Co-pays are $20 to see a Dr. and my prescriptions are $14 for 3 month supply for generics and $50 for 3 mos supply for name brand/not on formulary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Wow....that is awesome. You have a great job. Hope you can
keep it forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I only have to keep it for about 20 more years
then I can retire and enjoy the benefits of Medicare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm certain that those 47 million or so without health insurance are very
happy for you

as for the sample size upon which you formulate your opinions, and the conclusions drawn therefrom.....

you don't really expect to be taken seriously, do you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. and those of us with. I pay 400 a month for the cheapest health insurance around.
I know if anything ever appears to be from the past in any way I am not covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I have better insurance than the poster referenced, thanks to my evil union.
Edited on Sat Sep-26-09 07:38 PM by Gabi Hayes
doesn't keep me from empathising with those who don't have it, or, as you mention, are underinsured, or paying outrageous premiums for said underinsurance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. 20 more years until 65 - good luck!
that makes you about 45. Look around, are there a lot of people over 50 where you work? except of course for the executives?

I hope you can keep your job and the benefits, because I wouldn't wish being uninsured on anyone. But if you think anyone can go out and just get a good job with benefits, you are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. You are the exception, not the rule. and very very lucky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Of course these benefits are subject to change at any minute, for any reason.
Even if we think we have good insurance, chance our the employers are busy plotting ways to get rid of it, so as to pad the bottom line. Or, another trick is to fire the older employee "for cause" (though really because they are older) to hire someone cheaper to insure.

You may think you have it good, but I wouldn't turn my back on them if I were you. Corporation like to stab their employees in the bag. There is not a single business that is not run by assholes in this (or probably any other) country. You can count on them to cheat you, to steal from you, and treat all their employees like shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. And it's beyond the budget of nearly everyone and...
...there is a cap on treatment.

Other than that...great stuff...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. As long as no one in the family gets any sort of chronic illness..that really costs money to treat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. And it is an even numbered day in an odd numbered month...
...and no one in the family has NEVER had a pre-existing condition such as fleas and/or acne.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great interview--and very sad.
Her parents are still in US and her mother is a cancer survivor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yeah, I don't ever think I can go back because of the health care situation
Take away all the pre-existing condition shit, being self-employed, I just simply cannot afford it there without sacrificing my children's social mobility. In Canada, I simply never have to worry about losing it all every time I get behind a wheel, or my children get sick. Its total peace of mind a US insurance policy will fail to give you (reformed or not)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. Pelosi Says “F*&k You” to Trumka and the AFL-CIO
Pelosi Says “F*&k You” to Trumka and the AFL-CIO
By: Jane Hamsher Saturday September 26, 2009 11:17 am
please read this in it's entirety............
http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/09/26/pelosi-says-fk-you-to-trumka-and-the-afl-cio/
snip;

It's notable that among the Change to Win unions, only the Teamsters came out against the Baucus bill. (Whoever sold Hoffa on ditching the public plan is no doubt talking fast and trying to explain why he is now being kicked in the face.)

Incoming AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka has been outspoken in his insistence on the inclusion of a public option in any health reform bill, and has threatened to withhold support from Democrats who won't vote for it. Over the past week there was a lot of winking in reports that the White House was leaning on progressive groups to drop their support for the public option. It absolutely did happen, but the use of the word "groups" is probably misleading -- the organization they are talking about, the only one that matters, is the AFL-CIO.

Since other unions outside the AFL-CIO are working the yo-yo on the trigger, Trumka is the lone holdout. He's the mainstay, and there is tremendous pressure building within the AFL in response to arm twisting from the White House for him to cave. And if he falls, it's going to be difficult for the rest of the veal pen not to follow suit. So, he's being directly threatened.

The message is clear: "Get in line or we pay for your precious 'public option' by fucking you on health care benefits."

If Trumka suddenly starts singing the praises of triggers (even if they instantly "yo-yo" it back and insist he was misquoted), you'll know it worked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-27-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. That is just so pathetic....after all the Trumka did for Obama....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC