Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 60 vote misnomer?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 06:12 PM
Original message
The 60 vote misnomer?
Why are we counting Joe Lieberman as an automatic on the 60 vote count? I thought he was against the public option.

Is this just a cloture vote count that matters? I think it is disingenuous to count him with the Democrats as if there was a filibuster-proof majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. 60 is just a number and Liebermans is not a Democrat.
There are really only 58 Democrats in the Senate and you cannot depend upon Byrd being there. If there is not a dependable 60 votes, then what does it matter being a few votes away from 60. The Republicans will vote lock-step against anything anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So why is everyone trumpeting "60" as if it was some mystical magical barrier?
I do count Senator Sanders in standing with the Dem Caucus, but you make a good point about Senator Byrd given his age/health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I heard Al Franken himself say that when he was declared the winner that he was not the magic #60,
but he considered himself to be the second senator from MN.

It's the media that likes to trumpet the #60 as the unassailable protection against a filibuster. That's not reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. we don't need 60 votes.
let them filibuster. it's not worth losing the public option to prevent it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It is just frustrating to keep hearing this meme
trotted out as if it were a given. I know a room of big-tenters couldn't organize a pot luck, but do we really need the additional pressure of this misnomer?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. they started using the "60 vote" meme because they never thought they'd get it
it was a copout and will continue to be one. I'm surprised they havent changed legislation to 80 by now to kill a fillibuster.

Dems who dont want to vote for the progressive thing to do will always look for a copout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The funny thing was that the Founders who wrote the Constitution never included that 60 vote rule.
Neither did they include the filibuster. Those were things that the US Senate invented out of whole cloth. My guess is that it was a way to let a bunch of senators escape accountability by blaming it on something else besides their selfish want to hold onto power or their moral cowardice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC