Ruby the Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-28-09 06:12 PM
Original message |
|
Why are we counting Joe Lieberman as an automatic on the 60 vote count? I thought he was against the public option.
Is this just a cloture vote count that matters? I think it is disingenuous to count him with the Democrats as if there was a filibuster-proof majority.
|
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-28-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message |
1. 60 is just a number and Liebermans is not a Democrat. |
|
There are really only 58 Democrats in the Senate and you cannot depend upon Byrd being there. If there is not a dependable 60 votes, then what does it matter being a few votes away from 60. The Republicans will vote lock-step against anything anyways.
|
Ruby the Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-28-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. So why is everyone trumpeting "60" as if it was some mystical magical barrier? |
|
I do count Senator Sanders in standing with the Dem Caucus, but you make a good point about Senator Byrd given his age/health.
|
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-28-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I heard Al Franken himself say that when he was declared the winner that he was not the magic #60, |
|
but he considered himself to be the second senator from MN.
It's the media that likes to trumpet the #60 as the unassailable protection against a filibuster. That's not reality.
|
endless october
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-28-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |
4. we don't need 60 votes. |
|
let them filibuster. it's not worth losing the public option to prevent it.
|
Ruby the Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-28-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. It is just frustrating to keep hearing this meme |
|
trotted out as if it were a given. I know a room of big-tenters couldn't organize a pot luck, but do we really need the additional pressure of this misnomer?
|
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-28-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |
5. they started using the "60 vote" meme because they never thought they'd get it |
|
it was a copout and will continue to be one. I'm surprised they havent changed legislation to 80 by now to kill a fillibuster.
Dems who dont want to vote for the progressive thing to do will always look for a copout.
|
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-28-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. The funny thing was that the Founders who wrote the Constitution never included that 60 vote rule. |
|
Neither did they include the filibuster. Those were things that the US Senate invented out of whole cloth. My guess is that it was a way to let a bunch of senators escape accountability by blaming it on something else besides their selfish want to hold onto power or their moral cowardice.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |