Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rockefeller Blasts ‘Rapacious’ Insurance Companies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:32 AM
Original message
Rockefeller Blasts ‘Rapacious’ Insurance Companies
http://washingtonindependent.com/61199/rockefeller-blasts-rapacious-insurance-companies

Rockefeller Blasts ‘Rapacious’ Insurance Companies
By Mike Lillis 9/29/09 10:50 AM


The Senate Finance Committee this morning is taking up a much-anticipated amendment, offered by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), to create a public insurance plan to compete with private insurers on a newly formed health insurance exchange.

It likely won’t pass the committee, considering the conservative-leaning Democrats that sit on the panel. But that hasn’t stopped Rockefeller from arguing his case today in hopes of building momentum for the proposal when it hits the Senate floor. The highlights:

1) The public option would be just that: an option. No one would be forced to get coverage under the public plan.

2) Recent polls show that both the American public and physicians support the creation of a public plan.

3) The cost to administer the public option would be much less than private insurers pay to administer their plans, leaving millions of dollars that instead could be spent to care for patients.

4) And finally — and perhaps most significantly — the public option, being a nonprofit, wouldn’t have to worry about rewarding shareholders. The for-profit model, Rockefeller contended, necessarily puts profits before patients. “It’s a harsh statement,” he said, “but a true statement.”


After voting on the Rockefeller amendment, the committee will consider a second public plan amendment, sponsored by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good for Rocky. He's been hibernating ever since he decided not to run in '92. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. +1 for Americans who have more than merely a casual acquaintance with the English language...
The more so when they're on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. More like this, please
Ben Nelson, nincompoop from Nebraska, is yammering about health care reform needing 65 votes in the Senate in order to be considered "legitimate" in his eyes, and how he wants to see "savings." Well, Mr. Nelson, I'll bet 300 million health care consumers can swing a slightly better deal than each of those consumers individually entering the Colosseum to do battle alone with Big Pharma, Big Insurance, and Big Hospital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuball111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. I thought this was a democracy?
Even though polls show the people want it, the ones elected to serve and enact the will of the people STILL stonewall universal health care! And it's not even a majority of politicians.... it's a handful of conservatives posing as liberals sitting there feeding their asses on corporate money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Phony democracy: in rhetoric, yes. In actuality, no. Guess which more people believe in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuball111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I would like to think that democracy actually works....
But you're right, rhetoric seems to overshadow the real thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC